preview

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

Good Essays

Andrew Henriksen KW Comp. II Mrs. Champion 30 April 2024 Twelve Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis The play script, Twelve Angry Men (1957), is in a courthouse. A trial completed the presentation of evidence, which was followed by the twelve jurors discussing whether the defendant was guilty of the crime. The lengthy discussion followed when a juror questioned if the defendant had committed the crime. Throughout the play script Twelve Angry Men (1957) by Reginald Rose, the play script shows rhetorical devices through the actions of different jurors. When the jurors are discussing the evidence regarding the murder weapon, Juror Five provides an ethos. Juror Five grew up in the slums and saw many knife fights in his backyard (Rose 21, 56). If watching knife fights were a regular occurrence …show more content…

After describing the scene, he determined that it would have been unlikely that the old man would have heard the boy yell. This deduction would weaken the argument that the boy was guilty of the murder. Since a piece of evidence was seen as untrustworthy, the argument would reinforce the idea that the defendant was not guilty. Multiple forms of rhetorical devices were used during the play. The play script Twelve Angry Men (1957), written by Reginald Rose, uses various jurors and their actions to show ethos, pathos, and logos. Juror Five presents his ethos through his experiences in the slums, where the accused grew up. Emotion is displayed by Juror Ten and his outbursts that display distaste for people who have the same race as the defendant. Reasoning and logic were given by Juror Eight. He asked questions about each piece of evidence to determine if they were accurate. In the end, Eight is an analytical juror. Work Cited for: Rose, Reginald. Twelve Angry Men: A Play in Three Acts; Stage Version By Sherman L. Sergel ; Adapted from the Television Show of the Same Name Initially Presented On Studio One,

Get Access