F. Lecture 19 –1 Peter
Word Count: 565
1. Summarize the typical evangelical reconstruction of the circumstances behind the writing of 1 Peter.
The letter attributes the writing to Peter. Similarities in style with Acts and the Gospels seem to confirm the attribution along with a lack of objections from the early church about authorship. Peter probably used Silas as an amanuensis, accounting for the Greek style of the letter. The next verse claims that the letter was written from “Babylon”, likely a code name used for Rome. This coincides with tradition and with Paul’s correspondence since, according to 2 Tim. 4:11, Mark went to Rome in the mid 60’s. Thus, Peter is writing from Rome at the beginning of the Neronic persecution before his martyrdom
…show more content…
1:5-2:27). The second is “to love one another,” and the last is to have a “correct Christology.” With respect to these, James comes to mind given that faith invariably ought to lead to good works (obedience, love, and to seek to know God). Similarly, Paul’s argument in Galatians 5:6 is that faith works itself out through love. Paul showcases also love as a test of life.
4. Who, most likely, are the “dear children,” “fathers,” and “young men” of 2:12-14?
“Dear children,” likely refers to the entire church (all the audience). He then subdivides his audience—into fathers and young men—by age and probably by Christian maturity as well.
5. What relationship exists between 2:16 and the temptations of both Jesus in the wilderness and Adam and Eve in the garden?
In this passage, John summarizes three types of temptation: (1) desires of the flesh, (2) desires of the eyes, and (3) pride of life. These three are conspicuously similar to the temptations faced by Jesus in the wilderness (Matthew 4:1ff recounts that Jesus was tempted turn stones into bread—flesh—, to worship Satan to receive the kingdoms of the earth shown to him—the eyes—, and to throw himself so that Angels would save him—pride) and those of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden (Gen 3).
6. How did the lecturer explain the sin that leads to death in
…show more content…
What is apocalyptic literature and what distinct rules of interpretation apply to it?
The genre of apocalyptic literature is varied but was well known in the first century and can also be seen in other Christian and Jewish sources such as Daniel, Ezekiel, Zechariah, Jesus’ “Olivet Discourse,” and portions of 1 and 2 Thessalonians. This type of writing makes extensive use of symbolism, grotesque and outlandish imagery, and numbers infused with cryptic/symbolic meaning. It was often written in times of crisis, and can depict past, present, and future events intertwined or leading to moments of Godly intervention and triumph over evil forces.
Apocalyptic literature ought to be studied and analyzed in light of first-century history. The most important hermeneutical principle we can follow is, to make sense out of the text as a 1st century Christian in Asia-minor would have understood it, and not as a modern 21st-century Christians infusing meaning anachronistically into the text as it is often done. A literal interpretation is almost always the wrong approach to interpret such
The theme of desire has been portrayed in many novels and stories. Perhaps the most well-known depiction of desire can be found in the Bible. In the Book of Genesis, a snake tempts Adam and Eve to eat the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Knowledge after he convinces them that they will gain God’s knowledge of good and evil and be protected from death. Despite God’s word to not eat of the fruit, Adam and Eve did so anyway. Surely, this story portrays temptation; however, beyond the theme of temptation lays the theme of desire. Knowing it was wrong, Adam and Eve ate the fruit because they had the desire for what the snake promised them. Similarly, Toni Cade Bambara and John Updike also display the theme of desire in their short stories. In
One of the major themes of the book of Zechariah is Old Testament Eschatology. Eschatology is the doctrine of end times, or the study of last things. Zechariah’s message is divided into three main sections. The first section, chapters 1-8, is considered apocalyptic and is filled with eight visions succeeding one another in one night.The second section, chapters 7-8, delivered two years later, are an answer to the question whether the days of fasting and mourning for the destruction of the city should be kept any longer, and an assurance to the people of God 's presence and blessing. The third and final section, chapters 9-14, consists of two oracles. The first oracle (9-11) addresses God 's dealings with His people. The second oracle (12–14) points out the final conflict and triumph of God 's kingdom.
John’s philosophy on life was that to be a devout servant meant to willingly suffer (like Christ), and so he would find any opportunity to put himself through torturous physical pain. Furthermore, the advanced and perfect world that is depicted in this novel can be symbolic of the Garden of Eden. Both Adam and Eve were allowed to be naive and blissfully happy in the Garden of Eden (also depicted as a utopia), as long as they did not eat the forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. In this same way, the
The passage of Scripture being discussed in the following paper is Daniel 7:1-14. This chapter consists of three literary sections, first, chaos by the sea (7:1-8) followed by the heavenly courtroom (7:9-14), concluding with the visions divine victory and interpretation (7:15-28) which will not be addressed in this paper. The Christian canon locates the book of Daniel within its prophetic writings, however, the Jewish canon includes it within, “the Writings.” The book of Daniel doesn’t necessarily fit in either category, as it is widely considered within the literary category of apocalyptic literature which the subsequent sections of this paper will explore further. Daniel can be divided into three sections, based on language: a Hebrew introduction (Ch. 1); an Aramaic section (Ch. 2-7); and a Hebrew section (Ch. 8-12). Within these three language divisions exist two literary sections, first, the Tales (Ch. 1-6) followed by the Visions (Ch. 7-12). These two sections, though existing within the language divisions appear to have no corresponding connection.
“Revelation” translates Greek term apokalypsis, which means “an uncovering, an unveiling, a stripping naked of what was formerly covered” (Harris, 2014, p. 431). An apocalypse is something that is unforeseen or previously hidden. Revelations is a great example of an apocalypse because according to the author it is a vision of God’s future intentions and in some cases, it includes what is known as supernatural beings, angels, and demons as well. Revelations symbolizes the battle between good and evil. However, there are other known literary writings that use apocalyptic characteristics. Writers can express his or her views in Universality, Cosmic Dualism, Chronological Dualism, Ethical Dualism, Predestination, Exclusivism and/or Limited Theology
The majority of apocalyptic literature was written between second century B. C. and first century A.D. Apocalyptic literature is a specific genre and can be defined within a compositional understanding which includes apocalyptic works referring to historical Jewish events or describing other worldly journeys, prophesying about the end of the world, and the judgment of God. As has been shown while apocalyptic literature may not be considered canonical scripture by Protestants it is very fascinating to study and
Revelation's apocalyptic imagery continues to provide rich word pictures describing the conflict between God's kingdom and the world. Tonight, our study picks up in chapter eleven, where we will discuss the two witnesses and the afflictions that befell them. We ask you to join us as we dissect this chapter and understand its contextual meaning and its meaning for us
Both Adam and Eve were tricked into believing that the fruit will present them with a more fulfilling existence, but instead it proved lacking and disappointing. Furthermore, the narrator soon after says, “ Thousands of greedy individuals abandoned their sweet native hexagons and rushed upstairs and downstairs, spurred by their vain desire to find their Vindication.” (Borges 115) The “greedy individuals” the narrator speaks of are a symbol of humankind’s dissatisfaction with its existence, and its constant need to search for something more divine. Thus, the narrator describes Adam and Eve’s fall from Grace, which was “spurred by their vain desire to find their Vindication.”
The topic is still argued whether Zoroastrianism had any influence on these religions, but the similarities are intriguing. Evidence is hard to find, due to there being few texts available today in the Zoroastrian faith. Ethical dualism is one of most obvious similarities between these faiths, which is a belief in heaven or hell. Resurrection is one of the concepts that many scholars believe influenced Christianity. Mentioned within Zoroastrian texts are characters called “daevas”, and may be similar to the Devil. The book of Ezekiel mentions an apocalyptic vision, and may be derived from Zoroastrian concepts. The book of Daniel also mentions an apocalypse, saying that, “Those who lay dead in the earth will rise, some will have eternal life, some not. Another similarity Zoroastrianism and these religions have is of a savior figure. Scholars believe that the book of Isaiah contains a section called the “Little Apocalypse”, which talks about God emptying the earth and saving the righteous after wiping the planet clean. In one of Flavius Josephus’s texts, he talks about Zoroastrians converting to Judaism, which could account for some melding of beliefs. (Rose,
There are four major approaches to interpreting the Book of Revelation: the idealist approach, the preterist approach, the historicist approach, and the futurist approach. I will explore some of the thinking behind each of these approaches and discuss some of their strengths and weaknesses. I will briefly discuss the differences between premillennialist, postmillennialist, and amillennialist, as well as the differences between pretribulationist, midtribulationist, and post-tribulationist. Additionally, I will explain which of these is my preferred approach and why. Personally, I prefer the position of the futurist approach, premillennialist, and pretribulationist. Insert thesis statement.
The lure of temptations has often played an integral role in the human experience, for many a times, one’s has sacrificed his or her worldly duties and succumbed to primordial urges. From Odysseus and the Sirens, to the story of Adam and Eve, the reference to this Faustian ideal in literature has been ever pervading. Contemporary thought, especially religion, links these desires of temptation as sin and a lack of self-control, and views the discipline of overcoming such impulses as holy or righteous. Such is demonstrated in the tale of the “Temptation of Christ”, where Jesus, after refusing Satan’s attempts to allure him in the desert, is rewarded by angels and is sanctified. Simmilarly “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” by Robert Frost mirrors these ideals, suggesting that while the temptations one encounters in life may be strong, overcoming such urges and delaying gratification satisfies the human spirit
By Isaac Watts’s topic of evidence, Second Temple apocalyptic authors sought to encourage, change minds, and spur actions; but what authorities did they press into service? Did they press any into service? The four strongest possibilities of ANE authoritative topoi uncovered in this research are revelation of secrets, righteousness, divinely inspired journeys, and tablets (of some type), the first of which begins this chapter. time to leap into the abyss, to step towards understanding how Second Temple authors established authority in apocalyptic literature.
Some people may believe that prophecy and apocalyptic literature is a well-known subject because there are lots of books and papers concerning it, but there is still so much that will always be misunderstood. Prophesy and apocalyptic literature may have some similarities but they are structurally different in a way that makes them distinct. This paper will address prophecy and apocalyptic writings and determine the differences between them by using Daniel and Amos as templates.
The Hebrew and Christian religious traditions have a storied history of experiencing revelations, specifically Apocalyptic writings. Some examples of these visions include, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, John’s Revelation, and Julian’s Revelations of Love. Yet, the question remains, how credible these revelations are, especially the newer ones? If the Old Testament is taken as credible, then the New Testament and any subsequent writings must align with the Old Testament.
In the worlds of The Last Man by Marry Shelly and A Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood, the lives of the survivors of the apocalypse are thrown into chaos. In The Last Man, the people of England are driven out of their native home by the plague and forced into the desolate wasteland that is Europe. In A Handmaid’s Tale, Gilead society has torn Offred away from her past life and severed all her connections to it. In these troubled times, characters turn to religion either by force or their own free will. In apocalyptic scenarios in literature, the fragmentation of memories make the victims of the event susceptible to the controlling influence of religion.