6750655
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Read Foundation College, Samahni *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
50
Subject
Political Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by KidFlower12857
AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
1
American Presidency
Author
Affiliation
Course
Professor’s
Due Date
AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
2
The process of the selection of the American president occurs through the general
election process and the presidential nomination. The presidential nomination and the general
election process, however, do not lead to the choosing of the candidates on the basis of
effectiveness and governing; rather, they are skewed towards the nuances. The reform in the
nomination process altered significantly the process with the focus being on the caucuses and
primary, leading politicians to adopt populist approaches in the process. The radical viewpoints
in the campaigning process result in the diversion from the individual candidate's qualities and
can make a challenge for the Presidents who win to be able to fulfill their organizational
responsibilities. The election and nomination process are not effective in the determining the
qualities of the presidents and their ability to govern,
The nature of the reforms of the election is shaped by the stances the candidates choose
during the election.
Candidates must truly appeal to all sections of the country, as noted by
Greenstein (2009), rather than focusing on gaining the approval of party insiders, which had been
the goal of the previous nominations. This wider appeal is in line with the present nomination
process's wider focus, which encompasses a variety of demographics, geographical regions, and
political affiliations (Greenstein, 2009). As such, the candidates work to shape their policy
agenda to be reflective of the broader demographics and ideologies that make up the nation.
However, the nature of the highly divisive elections chosen by the candidates in the election
process affects their ability to develop an effective governing coalition.
Even though the public
now has the authority to nominate presidents, these revised procedures may lead to political
impasse and increased polarization, making it challenging for presidents who are nominated to
lead while in office—especially if their campaigns were marked by extreme or ideologically
driven positions (Nelson, 2021).
Following revisions, grassroots voters are now nominated. A
AMERICAN PRESIDENCY
3
candidate for the Presidency must directly appeal to a wider audience that spans a wider
spectrum of demographic and ideological viewpoints (Nelson, 2021). The primary audience's
decision to alter who becomes the presidential nominee has had a significant impact on how
contenders seek nominations (Hamilton & Madison, 1788a ). Candidates today adopt positions
and employ strategies that appeal to a wider spectrum of people in order to get their nominations
(Nelson, 2021). In order to win over voters in crucial primary states, candidates wage intense
campaigns, which has led to a rise in populist and ideologically driven campaigns (Greenstein,
2009; Nelson, 2021). For a new president to be effective to govern effectively after the election,
they should make some concessions for the other party. While each party has to maintain its
unique identity, the president should facilitate the collaboration of which reforms are essential to
ensure the governing of the parties together
(
Hamilton & Madison, 1788b). The presidency has to
gather the support of Congress by making various concessions to enable the fulfillment of its
agenda (Hamilton & Madison, 1788c).
Presidents need various personal qualities and skills so that they can lead effectively.
According to Greenstein (2009), various skills are needed by a president to be effective in office,
including efficacy as a public communicator, organizational capacity, political skill, policy
vision, cognitive style, and emotional intelligence. According to Greenstein's (2009) analysis of
the different presidents in the U.S., they varied widely according to the skills they possessed and
how they chose to utilize the skills during their tenure. For example, he indicates that while
Reagan was very effective as a public communicator, he was indicated to have some cognitive
limitations since, at times, he needed a better understanding of the policy initiatives during his
tenure. According to Greenstein's analysis, there needs to be an adequate representation of the
different skills among presidents who have governed the U.S. He indicates that some skills are
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help