A1

pdf

School

York University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1510

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

6

Report

Uploaded by MegaLightningSwan12

Test 1 3 parts. Test is graded out of 40 points (20% of your grade). Identify the types of definitions used (e.g. lexical or reportive, stipulative, ostensive, denotative, analytic, operational, persuasive) (1 each for 10 points in total) Spilling the tea means gossiping among contemporary American youth. Answer: Lexical An atomic bomb is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reaction. Answer: Denotative A just court decision is any court decision that when it is made, neither the prosecution nor the defence objects to it. Answer: Stipulative A scientist means Galileo, Copernicus, Lavoisier, Newton, Currie, Einstein… Answer: Ostensive For the purposes of this essay, a friend is anyone who exhibits loyalty to another person. Answer: Stipulative What is a baseball? That thing over there is a baseball. Answer:Ostensive A lawyer is defender of the weak and the downtrodden Answer: Persuasive I will call a lawyer any individua wearing a suite valued over 5000 dollars. Answer: Stipulative A lawyer is a person who guides and assists people in matters relating to the law. Answer: Lexical A good stand-up performance is a performance that when it is delivered people laugh.
Answer: Operational In the following essential definitions, identify (highlight in bold) genus and (underline) differentia. Evaluate the definitions for the adequacy of scope, explaining whether it is adequate, too broad, too narrow or both. For a grade, you must provide justification for your answer and illustrate it with examples. Answer that simply state too narrow or too broad will not be given a grade. (3 points each for 15 points in total) Logical argument is any coherent set of statements expressing disagreement between two individuals Answer (state narrow, broad, or adequate): Explain (justify with concrete examples): Too narrow. Definition limits the meaning to just a "disagreement between two individuals" whereas a logical argument can have various types of reasoning. For example, "showing your work" in math could also be considered a logical argument even though it does not include a disagreement between two individuals. A lamp is any electrical device emitting light Answer (state narrow, broad, or adequate): Explain (justify with concrete examples): Adequate. This definition successfully captures the essence of a lamp as it clearly states it is any electrical device that can emit light. For example, turning on your bedroom lamp would emit light and therefore be considered as a lamp. Studying means devoting of time and attention to acquiring knowledge on an academic subject by means of books. Answer (state narrow, broad, or adequate): Explain (justify with concrete examples): Adequate. Clearly indicates the essential elements of studying. For example, in exam periods students allocate alot of their time on understanding and practicing from textbooks, especially in subjects like math. Exercise is a physical activity that has impact on personal health, carried out for a specific goal . Answer (state narrow, broad, or adequate): Explain (justify with concrete examples):
Adequate. The definition correctly indicates excercise and its impacts, allwhile also encompassing a wide range of excersises. For example, walking can be considereding a physical activity that we do to get form point a to point b. Table is a piece of wooden furniture with a square flat top and four legs . Answer (state narrow, broad, or adequate): Explain (justify with concrete examples): Adequate. This definition accurately describes the typical and standardized features of a table, which include things like its structure. For example, most coffe tables would fit this definition to a tea. Represent the following arguments using the arrow diagrams. Number all the claims in the passage (insert the numbers in front of each claim, use parenthesis to separate claims). Set the indicator words in bold (if present). Underline or cross out the superfluous material that plays no part in the argument. For each argument, draw an arrow diagram representing the structure of the argument. (if you cannot draw directly into the text, please draw on a blank page, scan or photograph it, and insert into the test document). Use proper notation. (3 each for a total of 15 points). (1)Milton Friedman argued against the notion of moral responsibility of corporate manages to benefit society . (2)First, accepting that resources can be distributed in society on the basis of social goals limits the freedom of the individuals and undermines the rights to private property on which liberal society is based. (3)But we must preserve social freedom. (4)Second, managers are not trained to know what constitutes social benefit.(5) Furthermore, if managers tried to spend corporate money on social causes, stockholders would fire them. (6)Finally, if managers used corporate funds to benefit the society against the wishes of the stockholders, this would be like an imposition of a tax on the stockowners. (7)But only elected government officials should have the right to impose tax. (8)Hence, corporate managers should have only one responsibility maximize the profit for the stockholders within the law. (3 points)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
(1)The teacher s union will strike . (2) Either we build a new university library, or we increase the instructor s wages . (3) We cannot increase the wages because then the student enrollment will fall . (4)So, we will need to spend money on the library.(5) But if we spend the money on the library, the teacher s union will strike . (3 points)
(1)Euthanasia should not be legalized . (2) Introducing euthanasia will allow old or ill people who feel they are a burden to their families to kill themselves out of guilt even though they might want to live . (3)Hence, such choice is against he will of the person. (4) But since we must not allow the people to be coerced into killing themselves, euthanasia should not be legalized . (3 points)
(1)Jarvis Thompson argues that abortion is justified even if the fetus is a person with rights. (2)If you woke up one day connected by a dialysis machine to a famous violinist who needs your kidneys to keep him alive, you would feel you have a right to disconnect from him even if it kills him. (3)The situation with the fetus is not different from the situation with the famous violinists. (4)Hence, you have a right to disconnect the fetus from yourself even if it kills it . (3 points) (1)Euthanasia should be legalized. (2)First, euthanasia cannot harm anyone but the person undergoing it, and if the person choice to harm themselves, we must respect that wish. (3)Furthermore, in a situation when the individual is suffering, euthanasia is not a harm but a relieve. (4)And we have a moral obligation to provide people with a relieve from suffering. (5)Finally, euthanasia will reduce overall suffering in society, and improving social well-being is something we should aim for . (3 points)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help