Final Submission

docx

School

Bethune Cookman University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

570

Subject

Management

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by chardae98

Running head: FINAL SUBMISSION 1 Final Submission: Professor Daze Fluster Moesha C. Seaborn Southern New Hampshire University

FINAL SUBMISSION 2 Final Submission: Professor Daze Fluster Professor Daze Fluster is failing to impart the education he was trained for to his students, disregarding his qualifications and background in preparing them accordingly. This case study primarily revolves around Professor Daze Fluster and the students under him whose interactions are multi-faceted - as professor-learner pairs or even with a possibility of serving as their academic advisor/mentor. Ethical Conflict The primary ethical dilemma in this case study concerns Professor Daze Fluster's failure to provide his students with the appropriate level of education that he is trained for. He appears to be neglecting his educational background and knowledge, not using it effectively to equip his students with what they need. The fundamental issue here revolves around questions of competency, specifically a lack thereof or insufficient mastery on the part of Professor Fluster when it comes ethics principles, standards and skills presented to consumers - as defined by Koocher and Keith-Spiegel (2015). Consequently, due to poor performance by Professor Fluster in meeting their expectations; many perceive him as incompetent wasting precious resources such time without rendering any helpful support towards improving both himself and others involved in learning experiences under him. APA Code of Ethics Principles This case study unequivocally falls under the purview of Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility. This principle necessitates that psychologists possess an ethical obligation to aid in guaranteeing their colleagues maintain elevated ethical standards, as per Cherry (2023) who affirms this duty with regard to Fidelity and Responsibility. Professor Daze Fluster is failing to fulfill his obligation as an educator by neglecting to assist and teach his students. This lack of

FINAL SUBMISSION 3 responsibility betrays the trust that these individuals have placed in him, given that they are actively investing both their time and money into gaining knowledge from expert instructors like himself. Despite this expectation towards Professor Fluster's professional commitments, it appears he has lost sight of what being a teacher truly means which no longer aligns with student standards regarding effective educational practices. APA Code of Ethics Standards According to Principal C, psychologists must maintain integrity by refraining from deceit and misrepresentation in both research and practice (Cherry, 2023). Unfortunately, Professor Daze Fluster has displayed deceptive behavior towards his students throughout his career as a professor. As a result of his disorganization and lack of empathy for their struggles, he fails to fulfill the responsibilities that come with teaching – ultimately demonstrating unethical conduct. Statement of Culture and Social Orientations Within this case study, a social perspective suggests that Professor Daze Fluster is unable to carry out his responsibilities as a professor. It's possible he may no longer find joy in his work and struggle with moving on from it for various reasons. Additionally, the turmoil within his marriage could contribute to feelings of distress and disorganization at work. Various personal issues relating to family problems might unfortunately be impacting Professor Fluster’s professional life as well. Statement of Multiple Relationship Issues The ethical strategy developed by Professor Daze Fluster can be affected if he occupies multiple roles, such as being an academic advisor or mentor. Such overlapping relationships may cause a deficiency in his performance within those areas and create potential ethical problems that require remedial strategies to address them. When the issue of integrity arises in the

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

FINAL SUBMISSION 4 classroom teaching aspect of Professor Daze’s job due to these multiple role relationships, it is likely that other aspects will also suffer similar deficiencies. It would therefore be advisable for him to take leave until he can fulfill all responsibilities associated with his professorship without causing undue harm. In case he cannot meet all obligations required of him professionally, there should be somebody else appointed who could assume some or all functions previously held by Professor Daze so as not only support individuals but guarantee continued success at work too. The Ethical Decision-Making Model (Eight Step Model) Step 1: Determine whether the issue genuinely pertains to ethics. The issue of Professor Daze Fluster's teaching standards being linked to ethics is undeniable! Ethics are essentially defined as "moral principles that guide behavior or the performance of an activity" (Dictionary, 2023). Morally speaking, teachers have a responsibility towards their students - educating and equipping them for life beyond school. Without teachers, students would be adrift in both the real world and their chosen fields. In fact, parents play teacher from day one by raising us with vital knowledge on how to lead happy and responsible lives; it follows quite similarly when we progress onto academic educators later down the line. Step two involves referring to existing guidelines that could serve as a potential solution mechanism. This entails Professor Daze Fluster reviewing his teaching contract, revisiting the expectations set for him in this capacity. Additionally, he might benefit from consulting course syllabi; not only would it save time spent rifling through papers in his briefcase but also provide an outline of topics planned per class session. Step three involves taking a moment to thoroughly contemplate all factors that could potentially impact the decision at hand. Making an informed choice requires careful consideration of all available options, including any personal circumstances or distractions

FINAL SUBMISSION 5 affecting Professor Daze Fluster's daily life. It is important to objectively review all relevant information and avoid bias in order to determine the best course of action. As the fourth step, consider seeking guidance from a reliable colleague who has experience in your field. In this case, if the students approached their department head with concerns about Professor Daze Fluster's conduct, it might be appropriate for that individual to escalate the matter further up to higher authorities like the president of the department. Seeking counsel from fellow teachers can also be beneficial as they understand firsthand how challenging balancing professional and personal life responsibilities can become while teaching. Additionally, collaborating with colleagues may help identify alternative disciplinary methods for dealing with problematic behavior exhibited by Professor Daze Fluster after reviewing available information objectively together. Step five involves assessing the rights, duties and susceptibilities of all parties involved. This will ensure ethical treatment for everyone while maintaining confidentiality as required. The department head should have discussions with both Professor Daze Fluster and the students who reported him to get their perspectives on what transpired. By doing so, each side's concerns can be addressed accordingly in order to chart a path forward. Step six involves coming up with alternative decisions. One way to do this is by outlining the necessary course of action and identifying possible alternatives. For instance, it may be feasible to allow Professor Daze Fluster a leave of absence in order for him to address any personal issues that are affecting his teaching ability. In contrast, firing him outright would not necessarily solve the problem at hand and should therefore be avoided if possible. By considering different options like these, a solution can ultimately be found that serves everyone's

FINAL SUBMISSION 6 best interests more effectively than simply terminating employment without further consideration or discussion underway first! In step seven, it is crucial to consider the impact of each decision. It's important to carefully weigh the advantages and disadvantages of every option available. Evaluating all potential outcomes before making a decision ensures that you choose an option that best fits your needs. Typically, people tend to opt for choices with lesser consequences or repercussions. For example, firing Daze Fluster could have adverse effects such as finding a replacement teacher on short notice which may lead to students lagging behind their studies causing them either repeating classes or failing in examinations; hence this should be taken into account while making decisions during step 7. After reviewing all seven steps, it is time to make the ultimate decision. Consider all the data collected and possible outcomes before determining a course of action. Once decided upon, proceed with following through on that choice. In this situation, prioritizing ethics would mean allowing Professor Daze to step back from teaching for him to get his personal life in order. It is crucial that he has sufficient time and assistance if there are significant events hindering his ability to perform well professionally at this moment. When he eventually comes back after receiving proper support and restorative measures necessary for recovery purposes, he will be reinvigorated ready continued success as an effective educator once again. An Alternative Decision-Making Model: The Ethics Model The first step involves assessing the ethical predicament. According to Barnett and Johnson (2010), Carson (2013) and Remley & Herlihy, (2016), this is a crucial element of the ETHICS model as it establishes a foundation for implementing the framework by framing it

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

FINAL SUBMISSION 7 around comprehending what exactly constitutes an ethical dilemma. Therefore, understanding said issue plays an integral role in its analysis before moving on to subsequent steps. Professor Daze Fluster's students are facing a predicament as they feel dissatisfied with his teaching performance. His consistent lateness and lack of preparation have left them feeling that their time and money are not being well spent under his tutelage. The second step involves anticipating future scenarios. After identifying the ethical predicament, it is crucial to examine all potential consequences of various actions. During this phase, one must assess each alternative and comprehend its likely outcomes carefully. One practical approach could be outlining a list of advantages and disadvantages for every option chosen so that there's clear comprehension regarding consequent effects on both sides of the issue at hand. Due to Professor Dave Fluster's incompetence in teaching his students, he is at risk of losing his job. The situation has escalated so much that the students have taken their grievances to the department chair for intervention. If Professor Daze Fluster takes time off and gets adequate help, a substitute teacher may be hired temporarily until he improves his performance. However, if he gets fired abruptly it may pose difficulties finding an experienced replacement who understands the rules governing this specific educational institution as well as its departmental regulations while also leaving room for prolonged gaps without a professor in that position. Step three involves seeking assistance. It is crucial to identify the approaches commonly used by counselors and their corresponding courses of action. Additionally, it's vital to distinguish between obtaining help and receiving directives when dealing with consultation

FINAL SUBMISSION 8 queries that fall under four categories: legal, ethical, clinical, and risk management considerations. It might be beneficial for the department chair in this specific case to confer with other instructors in the same department. Perhaps they might shed light on the difficulties of teaching and what can derail a teacher to the point where he is unable to carry out his duties properly. It's something to think about, and it will provide the department head a clearer picture of the circumstances. Step 4: Get details. Possibly one of the most crucial steps is the information stage. It involves, “considering literature, regulations, and laws that pertains to the dilemma and combining it with analysis from the other steps of the mode" (Ling & Hauck, 2016). Considering the current situation, it is imperative to take into account relevant literature, laws, and regulations. It is imperative to review Professor Daze Fluster's contract in order to ascertain the potential options for the department chair. It's important to consider if this is his first or second violation. Given Professor Daze Fluster's past performance, he could be granted another opportunity, which would entail a written warning or perhaps some unpaid time off to attend to his personal needs. Professor Daze Fluster could be dismissed for breach of contract if this isn't his first or second infraction. Teacher tenure refers to the set of laws that shield educators from termination. Regarding teacher tenure, each state has its own set of rules and regulations. Tenure as a teacher is "a safeguard that protects good teachers from unfair firing - a basis due process right”. This implies that it gives Professor Daze Fluster the opportunity to defend himself and provide his colleagues an explanation for his behavior.

FINAL SUBMISSION 9 Step 5: Determine the Risk. The significance of each choice and how it could affect a counselor's exposure to possible liability and fulfillment of responsibility must be determined throughout this phase. To decide, one must abide by the rules. It is necessary to include in Professor Daze Fluster's contract the ability to take an unpaid leave of absence. In this manner, everyone agrees as to what may be done to support Professor Daze Fluster and give him the best opportunity to receive the assistance he needs. Professor Daze Fluster's teaching contract must be carefully examined if he is dismissed to ensure he has no basis for a wrongful termination lawsuit. Step six: Decide on an Action. Now that you've completed all these stages, choose an action. Now that all the information from the earlier phases has been gathered, it is time to decide on a morally sound plan of action. Premature decision-making increases the likelihood that the chosen course of action was the incorrect one. It's crucial to take your time in making the right choice, again choosing the one that will have the fewest negative effects. Allowing Professor Daze to step back from teaching to assist him in organizing his life would be the morally just thing to do. It is critical that Professor Daze be given the freedom to take the time necessary to care for himself. It is that he is experiencing life-altering events that have caused him to lose focus. After receiving the necessary support and time off, he will be well-rested and prepared to resume teaching his lessons. Conclusion To conclude, Professor Daze Fluster has a responsibility to maintain professionalism towards himself, his job, and students as a college professor. The case study suggests that he may not be fulfilling this role due to personal issues with the job or career dissatisfaction. It is suggested for Professor Fluster to take leave until he can resume teaching responsibilities

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

FINAL SUBMISSION 10 effectively while being held accountable for past actions. Moreover, ethical strategies should consider the potential conflicts of interest from multiple roles played by him such as academic advisor or mentor/tutor leading to controversial outcomes where leniency could be shown instead of proper consequences if any are warranted. If his peers choose to ignore the situation, it could result in him being terminated from work. It's crucial to consider diversity and equality as factors that may have an impact on this case study. As for Professor Daze Fluster, no distinct influence of diversity or equality was considered while arriving at a decision regarding this case study. After analyzing this specific case study, it was concluded that the optimal plan of action for Professor Daze Fluster is to grant him sufficient time to settle all his matters. Following an evaluation utilizing the eight-step decision making model, it became apparent that he requires some leave to enhance his performance and better fulfill his responsibilities. By taking adequate time off work, he will have a greater ability maintain satisfactory job output. I firmly believe that adhering to this course of action is most beneficial not only for Professor Daze Fluster himself but also for those under whom he teaches and guides daily.

FINAL SUBMISSION 11 References American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Apa Dictionary of Psychology. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/integrity Barnett, J. E., & Johnson, W. B. (2010). Ethics desk reference for counselors. Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association. Cherry, K. (2023, February 14). Apa Code of ethics: The Ethical Codes Psychologists Follow. Verywell Mind. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/apa-ethical-code- guidelines-4687465 Koocher, G. P., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2015). Ethics in Psychology and the Mental Health Professions (4th ed.). Oxford University Press Academic US. Ling, T. J., & Hauck, J. K. (2016, April 3). The Ethics Model: Comprehensive, Ethical Decision Making. www.counseling.org. Retrieved from https://www.counsel-ing.org/docs/default- source/vistas/the-ethics-model.pdf?sfvrsn=c9c24a2c_4 Westmaas, L. (2022, May 1). 7.2 decision-making models. Psychology Communication and the Canadian Workplace. Retrieved from https://ecampusontario.press- books.pub/communicationpsychology/chapter/7-2-decision-making-models/#RationalDe cisionMaking

Final Submission

Related Documents