CER Worksheet
docx
School
University Of Arizona *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
214
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by DukePowerOtter7
CER Worksheet
Use a Heading: Use a heading to capture the topic of the paragraph/category.
Make a Claim
: Make an assertion/statement about the data that you have reviewed. This should be a short, general statement without any data.
Provide Evidence:
Choose the strongest evidence to support your claim. Use varying data, e.g., a direct quote, averages, calling out a specific sub-category
, etc. When using the name of the sub-category
, italicize it. Offer Reasoning:
This is the wrap-up sentence and it has three parts: Start with a transitional word or phrases (
The data show,... The data indicates...Overall,...),
rephrase the Claim, then explain how this impacts the team, the department, the work environment. In other words, what does this mean to Marco? What is the impact?
Heading
Teamwork Claim
Gertrude is not a good teammate and can’t take constructive criticism Evidence
1.
The average rating for Gertrude’s teamwork is 3.75.
2.
Gertrude is unwilling to listen and has a hard time receiving feedback. 3.
Gertrude is unable to be flexible and work with other’s knowledge. Reasoning
This data indicates that Gertrude is unable to be an effective team member and cannot communicate well with others constructively. Heading
Leadership Claim
Gertrude prefers to work alone and is not a first-choice leader. Evidence
1.
The average rating for Gertrude’s teamwork is 6.5. 2.
Gertrude averaged an 8 for suggesting important issues, which shows great initiative, but in other areas lacks collaboration. 3.
In participation, Gertrude was rated a 6 in the sub-category of soliciting divergent opinions from others, suggesting that she prefers to work individually without other’s influence.
Reasoning
Overall, Gertrude is takes initiative with the material, however, is better working individually and not a candidate for leadership positions. Heading
Technical Competency Claim
Gertrude shows proactive technology skills and ability to thoroughly understand research data. Evidence
1.
Gertrude’s average rating for technical competency was 9.25 2.
Gertrude was rated a 10 in the sub-category explaining their work to others
which shows high proficiency in computer content. 3.
Work is completed fully and with application of skills with a rating of 10 in technical savvy. Reasoning
The data shows Gertrude is able to handle computer skills and apply technological knowledge to research an in helping others through process.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help