480 Final Essay Completed
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Washington, Bothell *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
480
Subject
Economics
Date
Apr 29, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by SuperKangaroo2680 on coursehero.com
The most impactful competitive advantage for Arcor is consumers' demand for the product when it first came out, offering good products at affordable prices. They also
began exporting their products internationally to Paraguay, in 1979 it entered Uruguay, and by 1981 it had established itself in Brazil. Pagani knew the importance of creating Latin American integration and belonging to the regional market. He noted “We created our own Mercosur ten years before the word even existed. Some of the late-mover advantages of Arcor have been its international presence and good product segments. Chile and Argentina were 2
nd
and 3
rd
biggest markets. Arcor’s suppliers, production, channels and distribution, and marketing were the main categories of their late-mover advantages. To consider Arcor an emerging giant, one of the listed criteria from the article “Emerging Giants” explains the extent to which a company’s operations are globalized. A good example is Arcor operating in multiple countries already. Looking at the sales of the products outside of its domestic market, Arcor made less in all of them in 1997 but grew in 2001 (Exhibit 11). They have been able to successfully compete and operate in the global marketplace making them an emerging giant. Although they are emerging markets and producing products, the ability to grow in new markets was limited by local governments at the time. The company focused on exports before the crisis. Arcor restructured its international division, adding more employees and more markets. Differences in local tastes characterized each new market, pursuing a different strategy would require large investments and considerable coordination. Because they established a presence internationally and investigated globalizing into the US, Canada,
Europe, and Asia, Arcor still had issues that they would only find once they emerged.
Arcor should emerge by exporting and establishing partnerships with successful networks in the area because they have limited research and knowledge about other markets. Europe seemed to have the most potential for growth sitting at 2.3 percent of Arcor’s total exports. Of the 1.018 billion dollars of the total market, Arcor obtained $854
million in 2000. Europe makes up 3 percent of that, which is a reasonable amount to work with. The most recent revenue for exports in Europe was 5,024 million with 2.3 exports. Assuming there is $7 billion for all sectors divided by the $5,024 million, Arcor sends out about 13 reports to Europe. With these numbers, the calculation for the target revenue was found to be $660 thousand with a cost of $50.75 thousand per export. Equity was $423,968 in 2001 which
leads to the assumption of how they will pay for the target revenue. Arcor would need to
raise capital to emerge in Europe by selling stock or utilizing disposable investment money. Based on the economic analysis, Arcor Group has the potential to emerge and utilize its earnings to grow in another country. In 2000, Argentina and Brazil made $110,855 selling plastic packaging company and their beverage brand to Kraft. In 2001 for various sectors, Arcor made $29,319 by selling other nonstrategic assets. Arcor has matured in South America and has been there the longest based on the pie chart in Exhibit 14b. North America came in second, then so on with all the others. Arcor has a good presence in each sector but the least in Oceania. The success
of Arcor in Europe depends on the risk factors they pinpoint and then avoid or prevent. Also, starting from scratch is a big reason to risk emerging to Europe because there is an increase in premium chocolate products like in America. This could potentially be a good opportunity to adjust to consumer preferences and invest more to make more.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Questions
At the start of 2010 a new free trade area was established incorporating China and the six founding members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). These countries are Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. The aim is to eliminate 90% of imported goods. This deal created the largest trade area in the world, with nearly 1.9bn people. Although there are undoubted gains there have also been warnings from South East Asia that some industries are not ready to compete with China and that jobs will be lost.
Questions
What is a free trade area?
Outline the potential advantages and disadvantages of joining this area for the member countries.
What factors determine the extent to which industries within a country gain or lose?
arrow_forward
“In an era of globalization, firms build cross-border alliances or international strategic alliances (ISAs) to achieve certain strategic objectives, such as knowledge creation, with the help of overseas partners. Working with partners complicates the operation of such alliances, however, particularly when the partner firms come from countries with very different cultures, institutions, and levels of economic development.
Do you agree with this statement? If yes, what would you propose to make international strategic alliances more effective/successful?
arrow_forward
At the start of 2010 a new free trade area was established incorporating China and the six founding members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). These countries are Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. The aim is to eliminate 90% of imported goods. This deal created the largest trade area in the world, with nearly 1.9bn people. Although there are undoubted gains there have also been warnings from South East Asia that some industries are not ready to compete with China and that jobs will be lost.
Question:
What factors determine the extent to which industries within a country gain or lose?
arrow_forward
During the last 20 to 30 years, there have been a number of countries whose economies have experienced important economic expansion and development. One group of countries has been labeled the BRIC countries and the other the VISTA countries. Identify each of the nine countries and provide some insights about their economies and economic importance.
The theories of absolute and comparative advantage have been offered as an economic rationale for trade between and among regions and countries. Compare and contrast the two concepts. Which of the two do you think is more important for explaining the growth in global trade during the last 25 years? Why”
arrow_forward
According to Porter's "diamond" model, the success or competitive advantage of a nation at the global stage depends upon the interaction of all of the following EXCEPT
Related and supporting industries
Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry
Demand conditions and Factor endowments
The local population arranging a multimillion-cash donation to the foreign firm
arrow_forward
The more dissimilar two cultures are, the greater the degree of influence culture has on intercultural communication. How strongly intercultural communication has affected the business world
arrow_forward
Understand the role of cross-functional teams in promoting integration?
arrow_forward
On his first day in office, President Donald Trump took the United States out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed free trade deal with 11 other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, representing nearly 40% of global GDP. If the TPP had come into existence, the countries in the TPP would NOT be in violation of the most-favored nation (MFN) principle in the World Trade Organization (WTO) by giving each other preferential trade access. Why?
A. There is an exception to MFN regarding the Generalized System of Preferences. Because Vietnam, a developing country, was one of the 12 members of the TPP, that exception applies to the whole partnership.
B. Because the United States has the largest economy in the world, it gets to decide when MFN applies and when it doesn’t.
C. There is an exception to MFN regarding regional trade agreements (RTA), and because all the proposed members inhabit the Asia-Pacific region, the TPP would have been an RTA, and therefore, members could give…
arrow_forward
Economics Question
arrow_forward
From 1865-1900, the U.S. exploded onto the world stage as a true industrial power. A number of things contributed to the boom, but one of the biggest reasons was the flood of immigrants that entered the U.S. between 1880 and 1910. Why did these immigrants come to the U.S.? How did they enter the U.S.? In what sort of conditions did they live and work? How did other Americans react to them? Most importantly, explain the impact immigration had on the U.S. as a whole in this time period
arrow_forward
NAFTA has benefited the Canadian, Mexican and U.S. economy, while also having some drawbacks. I believe NAFTA was initially established to increase international trade, lower barriers, and build the economies of those involved. It was ultimately successful in eliminating tariffs and reducing some trade barriers. While increasing trade between the involved countries, it also created jobs, increased foreign direct investment (FDI), and lowered prices for consumers. However, many are still opposed to NAFTA and argue that the cons outweigh the pros. While supporting many jobs, many industries were still negatively affected such as the manufacturing, automotive, textile, and computer industries. Mexico was also negatively affected because the U.S. allowed for government subsidized agricultural products within the country. As a result, many Mexican farmers could not compete with this which put them out of business. That is why NAFTA was eventually converted to the United States-Mexico-Canada…
arrow_forward
As you may have heard, Russia decided to invade its neighbor, which has led to international condemnation (albeit not on all fronts). The EU, a former major importer of gas from Russai, went ahead with sanctions. Imagine, if you will, that the respective heads of state get together and try to negotiate a trade agreement to end sanctions. They each have three possible choices: (a) Maintain tariffs against the other nation (T); (b) Seek mediation from the WTO, which would implement an international trade agreement at a small cost (M); (c) Unilaterally remove tariffs (F). The payoff matrix is as given below. Is there a dominant strategy for either player? Find all the (pure strategy) Nash equilibria in the game. How would this change if, instead, the mediation is costless and yields a payoff of 50 to each nation (assuming mutually successful mediation) and a payoff of 0 (if the other nation chooses otherwise)? **
arrow_forward
Suppose France charges 2 Euros tariff on imports of a particular product. It can domestically produce this product at 8 Euros. There are only 2 other countries that produce this product: Turkey at 7 Euros, and Brazil at 5 Euros. Without any regional integration agreement, France would consume (French/Brazilian/Turkish) products. When it enters into a customs union agreement with Turkey, it would consume (French/Brazilian/Turkish) products. This is (beneficial/harmful) to the economies involved.
arrow_forward
The war Russia is waging against Ukraine has already halted most of Ukraine’s production capabilities. Similarly, the sanctions raised against Russia by the international community end decades of economic cooperation across several economic sectors.
Considering both countries main imports and exports along with their export share of world production and how international supply chains will adjust to the economic disruptions brought by violence. Highlight three (3) ways in which you believe the disruptions in the international supply chains may affect the Caribbean region.
arrow_forward
When a country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good, it means that it can produce this good at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partner. Then the country will specialize in the production of this good and trade it for other goods.
The following graphs show the production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for Candonia and Sylvania. Both countries
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
produce lemons and coffee, each initially (i.e., before specialization and trade) producing 18 million pounds of lemons and 9 million pounds of coffee, as indicated by the grey stars marked with the letter A.
Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of lemons, while Sylvania has a comparative advantage in the production of coffee. Suppose that Candonia and Sylvania specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative…
arrow_forward
Suppose the two countries we considered in the numerical example in the text were to integrate their automobile market with a third country with an annual market for 3,750,000 automobiles. Find the number of firms, the output
per firm, and the price per automobile in the new integrated market after trade.
You are given the following information:
The total sales (S) in the industry after integration are 6,250,000 automobiles per year.
30,000 xQ
The marginal revenue curve facing any one producer is described by the equation MR = P -
Each producer has the following costs: fixed costs (F) of $750,000,000 and a constant marginal cost (c) of $5,000.
In equilibrium, the number of firms will be
(Round your answer down to the nearest integer.) Help!"
The equilibrium price will be $
(Enter your answer to the nearest dollar.)
The equilibrium output per firm is
(Round your answer to the nearest integer.)
arrow_forward
ARTICLE/HISTORY OF GLOBAL MARKET
INTEGRATION
- GLOBAL MARKET INTEGRATION DID NOT
HAPPEN OVERNIGHT. IT WAS THE RESULT
OF THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A GLOBAL
ECONOMY THAT INVOLVED THE
HOMOGENIZATION OF TRADE AND
COMMERCE. PRIOR TO THE TRENDS IN
GLOBALIZATION OF THE 20TH CENTURY,
INTERNATIONAL TRADE AND EXCHANGE OF
GOODS AND SERVICES WERE ALREADY
PRACTICED. HARVEY (1990) SEES THAT CITY
AND COUNTRIES WERE ABLE TO EXTEND
THEIR REACH BEYOND BORDERS AND
PATTERNS OF TRADE AND TECHNOLOGY
BECAUSE OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SHIPPING
AND NAVIGATION.
THIS WAS OBSERVABLE IN THE
DEVELOPMENT OF MARITIME TRANSPORT
THROUGHOUT HISTORY. COLONIALISM AND
IMPERIALISM ROSE AS THE NEW WAYS OF
PUTTING ORDER TO THE ECONOMIC
INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG COUNTRIES.
EQUITY, CORPORATE OWNERSHIP,
MANAGEMENT SUBSIDIARIES, AND
CENTRAL HEADQUARTERS WHICH SUPPLY
AND DISTRIBUTE GOODS AND SERVICES
WERE ESTABLISHED THROUGH
COLONIALISM. THE SPANISH GOVERNMENT
IN THE 1960S, FOR INSTANCE MADE USE OF
ITS COLONIES LIKE THE PHILIPPINES AND…
arrow_forward
You're the CEO of a small company traveling to another country (assume a country of your choice) to complete a business deal with a foreign company. Your plane landed there on time, you're feeling fine, and everything seems to be going well. The cab driver, who doesn't speak much English, understood where you needed to go and started driving. He starts to listen to a Justin Bieber song and asks you in broken English what type of music you like. As your cab enters the hotel, you notice a McDonald's restaurant across the street with familiar golden arches. You check-in with your credit card, call your spouse from your iPhone and exchange some dollars at the money exchange place at the lobby of the hotel. You then get some take-out food from the McDonald's since you'll get plenty of opportunities to dine in local restaurants later on.
When returning to your hotel room, you wonder why the instructor at the culture training class asked you to be careful about cultural differences when…
arrow_forward
If Argentina has an absolute advantage in the production of wheat and Chile has an absolute advantage in the production of copper, then
A) neither country has anything to gain from specialisation and trade.
B) it is reasonable to expect that specialisation and trade will benefit both countries.
C) it is reasonable to expect that trade will benefit both countries, but specialisation will not.
D) it is reasonable to expect that specialisation will benefit both countries, but trade will not
arrow_forward
Fill in the gaps (1 word per gap), there are extra words.
Studying international business is a complex task. The nature of the topic demands a generalist approach that (0)……………….. not just diverse countries, but cultures, industry sectors and specific firms. Whereas international trade has existed for millennia, it has grown from an estimated 6% of world GDP in the early 19th Century to approximately 60% in the early 21st Century – a tenfold rise. At its most basic, it includes the sale of goods and services between countries. Yet, varying forms ofinternational business can be observed. For example, a business that produces components or goods overseas but sells them (1)……………….. can be considered an international business, as can a firm that (2)……………….. services, such as call centers, to locations where labor expenses might be cheaper. For most organizations, decisions around building, producing, and selling products or services are informed by many factors. Fundamentally, a firm’s…
arrow_forward
When Korea moved to an export-oriented industrialization strategy in the mid-1960s it did not dismantle the protection of the existing infant industries. Infant industries were vigorously promoted alongside the export drive, the main thrust coming in the mid-1970s under the name of “heavy and chemical industrialization” policy. In the early 1980s, Korean industrial policy ceased to favor explicitly certain industries but had to cope with the legacy of previousindustrial policy.
In summary, Korean infant industries were not allowed to live complacently behind the wall of protection but rather were driven to compete and improve performance. The process was not interrupted by foreign exchange crises. This should have also led to faster growth of output for infant industries. Protected infant industries failed to grow fast in most developing countries apparently for the same reasons they failed to mature
a) What could have been the motivations of the Korean government for carrying out an…
arrow_forward
If Big Macs were a durable good that could be costlessly transported between countries, which of the following would present an arbitrage
opportunity? Check all that apply.
Exporting Big Macs from Poland to China
Exporting Big Macs from the United States to the Eurozone
Exporting Big Macs from Norway to China
arrow_forward
Why would multinational corporations from the U.S. be interested in emerging and developing markets (e.g. Latin America, Africa, Central and Southeast Asia)?
Would MNCs be better off focusing their efforts on more industrialized markets (US, Canada, western Europe, Australia, Japan)? Explain?
arrow_forward
You are a strategist with a multinational company. Summarize the implications of COVID-19 on international trade.
List three potential changes to trade policy that could occur as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
arrow_forward
Three former Uruguayan presidents recommended the current administration that without abandoning Mercosur, it should look at major trade blocks associations but at the same time a strong self criticism is needed because maybe the problem is not in Mercosur but in Uruguay.
The absence of conditions in the Uruguayan economy to compete for markets and investments, the wrong energy and foreign policies and the infinite tolerance with the bilateral mechanism imposed by Argentina and Brazil in the region are the main causes by which Mercosur has seen its rules and institutions erode and most probably leading it to a major failure.
The three leaders are Julio Maria Sanguinetti (1985/1990 and 1995/2000); Luis Alberto Lacalle (1990/1995) and Jorge Batlle (2000/2005). The only living president missing at the conference was Tabare Vasquez (2000/2005), who belongs to the current ruling coalition.
“We need powerful friends and partners but distant” said Lacalle who suggested Uruguay should reach…
arrow_forward
Three former Uruguayan presidents recommended the current administration that without abandoning Mercosur, it should look at major trade blocks associations but at the same time a strong self criticism is needed because maybe the problem is not in Mercosur but in Uruguay.
The absence of conditions in the Uruguayan economy to compete for markets and investments, the wrong energy and foreign policies and the infinite tolerance with the bilateral mechanism imposed by Argentina and Brazil in the region are the main causes by which Mercosur has seen its rules and institutions erode and most probably leading it to a major failure.
The three leaders are Julio Maria Sanguinetti (1985/1990 and 1995/2000); Luis Alberto Lacalle (1990/1995) and Jorge Batlle (2000/2005). The only living president missing at the conference was Tabare Vasquez (2000/2005), who belongs to the current ruling coalition.
“We need powerful friends and partners but distant” said Lacalle who suggested Uruguay should reach…
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Related Questions
- At the start of 2010 a new free trade area was established incorporating China and the six founding members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). These countries are Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. The aim is to eliminate 90% of imported goods. This deal created the largest trade area in the world, with nearly 1.9bn people. Although there are undoubted gains there have also been warnings from South East Asia that some industries are not ready to compete with China and that jobs will be lost. Questions What is a free trade area? Outline the potential advantages and disadvantages of joining this area for the member countries. What factors determine the extent to which industries within a country gain or lose?arrow_forward“In an era of globalization, firms build cross-border alliances or international strategic alliances (ISAs) to achieve certain strategic objectives, such as knowledge creation, with the help of overseas partners. Working with partners complicates the operation of such alliances, however, particularly when the partner firms come from countries with very different cultures, institutions, and levels of economic development. Do you agree with this statement? If yes, what would you propose to make international strategic alliances more effective/successful?arrow_forwardAt the start of 2010 a new free trade area was established incorporating China and the six founding members of the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). These countries are Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. The aim is to eliminate 90% of imported goods. This deal created the largest trade area in the world, with nearly 1.9bn people. Although there are undoubted gains there have also been warnings from South East Asia that some industries are not ready to compete with China and that jobs will be lost. Question: What factors determine the extent to which industries within a country gain or lose?arrow_forward
- During the last 20 to 30 years, there have been a number of countries whose economies have experienced important economic expansion and development. One group of countries has been labeled the BRIC countries and the other the VISTA countries. Identify each of the nine countries and provide some insights about their economies and economic importance. The theories of absolute and comparative advantage have been offered as an economic rationale for trade between and among regions and countries. Compare and contrast the two concepts. Which of the two do you think is more important for explaining the growth in global trade during the last 25 years? Why”arrow_forwardAccording to Porter's "diamond" model, the success or competitive advantage of a nation at the global stage depends upon the interaction of all of the following EXCEPT Related and supporting industries Firm strategy, structure, and rivalry Demand conditions and Factor endowments The local population arranging a multimillion-cash donation to the foreign firmarrow_forwardThe more dissimilar two cultures are, the greater the degree of influence culture has on intercultural communication. How strongly intercultural communication has affected the business worldarrow_forward
- Understand the role of cross-functional teams in promoting integration?arrow_forwardOn his first day in office, President Donald Trump took the United States out of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), a proposed free trade deal with 11 other countries in the Asia-Pacific region, representing nearly 40% of global GDP. If the TPP had come into existence, the countries in the TPP would NOT be in violation of the most-favored nation (MFN) principle in the World Trade Organization (WTO) by giving each other preferential trade access. Why? A. There is an exception to MFN regarding the Generalized System of Preferences. Because Vietnam, a developing country, was one of the 12 members of the TPP, that exception applies to the whole partnership. B. Because the United States has the largest economy in the world, it gets to decide when MFN applies and when it doesn’t. C. There is an exception to MFN regarding regional trade agreements (RTA), and because all the proposed members inhabit the Asia-Pacific region, the TPP would have been an RTA, and therefore, members could give…arrow_forwardEconomics Questionarrow_forward
- From 1865-1900, the U.S. exploded onto the world stage as a true industrial power. A number of things contributed to the boom, but one of the biggest reasons was the flood of immigrants that entered the U.S. between 1880 and 1910. Why did these immigrants come to the U.S.? How did they enter the U.S.? In what sort of conditions did they live and work? How did other Americans react to them? Most importantly, explain the impact immigration had on the U.S. as a whole in this time periodarrow_forwardNAFTA has benefited the Canadian, Mexican and U.S. economy, while also having some drawbacks. I believe NAFTA was initially established to increase international trade, lower barriers, and build the economies of those involved. It was ultimately successful in eliminating tariffs and reducing some trade barriers. While increasing trade between the involved countries, it also created jobs, increased foreign direct investment (FDI), and lowered prices for consumers. However, many are still opposed to NAFTA and argue that the cons outweigh the pros. While supporting many jobs, many industries were still negatively affected such as the manufacturing, automotive, textile, and computer industries. Mexico was also negatively affected because the U.S. allowed for government subsidized agricultural products within the country. As a result, many Mexican farmers could not compete with this which put them out of business. That is why NAFTA was eventually converted to the United States-Mexico-Canada…arrow_forwardAs you may have heard, Russia decided to invade its neighbor, which has led to international condemnation (albeit not on all fronts). The EU, a former major importer of gas from Russai, went ahead with sanctions. Imagine, if you will, that the respective heads of state get together and try to negotiate a trade agreement to end sanctions. They each have three possible choices: (a) Maintain tariffs against the other nation (T); (b) Seek mediation from the WTO, which would implement an international trade agreement at a small cost (M); (c) Unilaterally remove tariffs (F). The payoff matrix is as given below. Is there a dominant strategy for either player? Find all the (pure strategy) Nash equilibria in the game. How would this change if, instead, the mediation is costless and yields a payoff of 50 to each nation (assuming mutually successful mediation) and a payoff of 0 (if the other nation chooses otherwise)? **arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134078779
Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:9780134870069
Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305585126
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...
Economics
ISBN:9781259290619
Author:Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education