ANTHROPOLOGY
2
What Do You Think About Morgan's Theory?
I think Morgan's theory is important as it challenges the conventional perspective on
human evolution, which has primarily focused on terrestrial adaptations and savannah
environments. Her "Aquatic Ape Theory" introduces a compelling alternative narrative that
highlights the potential influence of an aquatic lifestyle on our ancestors. While it's true that
Morgan's theory faces skepticism and is not widely accepted in the scientific community, I
believe it serves a valuable purpose. It encourages us to think critically and question established
ideas. Science thrives on such challenges, and considering alternative viewpoints can lead to
breakthroughs in our understanding of human evolution. Moreover, Morgan's theory draws
attention to the gaps in our knowledge. It prompts us to explore neglected aspects of our
evolutionary history and encourages interdisciplinary research. By doing so, it contributes to the
ongoing quest for a complete and more accurate picture of our past.
Difference From the Textbook
Morgan's theory emphasizes environmental influences impacting human evolution,
unlike classroom textbooks. The generally recognized savannah theory states that early hominins
developed on open grasslands (Chapter 6). In contrast, Morgan's idea suggests that a semi-
aquatic environment may shape important human qualities (T,2009). This major difference from
the dominant view prompts us to rethink our species' development. Traditional ideas have
illuminated human development, but Morgan's perspective emphasizes the need to constantly
reexamine them. Anthropology gains a more complete knowledge of our complicated
evolutionary past from this variety of ideas.
Reasons to come up with new theories about bipedal locomotion.
