Chapter 4 In re Sledge LEX 110

docx

School

Cape Fear Community College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Accounting

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Report

Uploaded by paigefall30

Paige Fallbright Mrs. Clarke LEX 110 December 3, 2023 Chapter 4 In re Sledge 1. What does B.R. denote in the case citation? B.R. denotes to Bankruptcy Reporter. 2. Who was the attorney? The attorney was Peter Gemborys. 3. Who was the paralegal? The paralegal was Mary Tatum. 4. Who were the clients? The clients were Mr. and Mrs. Sledge. 5. What type of case was the attorney originally hired for? The attorney was originally hired to file a bankruptcy petition. 6. What is the cause of action in this case? The cause of action in this case was the failure of Mr. Gemborys ability to perform as the client’s attorney and to demonstrate his duty of care. 7. What actions did the paralegal take? The paralegal gave legal advice and allowed Mrs. Sledge to sign the petition before it was fully prepared. 8. What actions did the attorney do or not do? The attorney did file documents needed but did not file them on time. He sent a letter to Mr. Janvier with what the attorney had requested of Gemborys’ clients’ information. He failed to communicate with his clients, act professionally, supervise and review his paralegal’s work, and meet and review with clients. 9. Read Rule 5.3. Did the attorney violate the Rule? If yes, in what ways? Yes, the attorney did violate the Rule. He failed to supervise Ms. Tatum. Ms. Tatum’s actions did not line up with the professional obligations of the lawyer. Mr. Gemborys also knew of Ms. Tatum’s actions and did not make an effort to stop it. The attorney and paralegal violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. 10. Do you feel the attorney adequately supervised his paralegal? Explain your answer, that is, from what you have learned, did the attorney follow the Rules of Ethics? No, the attorney did not adequately supervise his paralegal. He would not have let the paralegal get the client’s signature without the petition being fully prepared. He would have made sure the paralegal did not give legal advice to the clients. He would have made sure the changes the client asked for were made. He would also have the paralegal draft letters and get his approval to keep the clients informed. He would have his paralegal set up meetings with the client. The attorney did not follow the Rules of Ethics.
Paige Fallbright Mrs. Clarke LEX 110 December 3, 2023 The attorney failed to perform his duty of care with the lack of communication, professional conduct, and representation. 11. What, if any, Canons of Ethics did the paralegal violate? Cite the Canon numbers. The paralegal violated the Canons of Ethics. The Canons she violates are Canon 2 (maintain a high level of personal and professional integrity), Canon 3 (maintain a high standard of professional conduct), Canon 4 (not engage in the unauthorized practice of law), Canon 8 (clearly and accurately communicate information about services), and Canon 10 (assist in the enforcement of these Rules of Ethics). 12. If you were the paralegal, what would you have done if you were in the same situation? If I was Ms. Tatum, then I would have performed my duties as a paralegal being professional and following the Rules of Professional Conduct. I would ensure my attorney supervised and reviewed my work. I would never engage in unauthorized practice of law. I would also communicate regularly with the debtor clients about any changes and updates about their case. Most importantly, I would have reported my attorney if I was aware of the poor professional conduct and breach of duties that the attorney performed.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help