Stored procedure

both. Then they send those recording to DTI Global, allowing them to write up the depositions and transcripts of the case. The case file will have the prosecutor’s statement of why they are filing the case and what they are requesting out of the defendant. The defendant’s statement of the accusation is also in the file. After all information is given the clients of this corporation surely started to show their true colors. They were not that amicable and they had very particular request. Because

The Firm represented the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe in successfully moving for summary judgment regarding a breach of contract action against a gaming management contractor. The case is Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. Bettor Racing, Inc. and J. Randy Gallo, case number 2013-11, in the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribal Court. In a well-reasoned 26-page opinion by the Honorable Sherman J. Marshall, the Tribe’s motion was granted in its entirety. The Court held that Bettor Racing breached its contract

INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss their action against the Defendants under K.S.A 60-241(b). Defendants have opposed this motion because they feel it would be unfair to them because 1) it would not settle the issues in the case, 2) it would deny the Defendants further discovery, and 3) it represents only a partial dismissal of the case because the Court would maintain the protective order. This memo is divided in two main parts. The first part discusses both dismissals without and with

Estate of Cericola v. Community Medical Center, et al. (Product Liability - Wrongful Death – Reliance Washer – New Jersey) Parties continue to exchange discovery. Plaintiff has filed a notice to take the deposition of a former STERIS technician who serviced the account prior to his retirement. The technician had in his possession during a meeting with STERIS’s outside a retainer that broke back when he serviced the account in July of 2013 following the alleged leak. The retainer was replaced following

Your, Honor, this is Moore versus Moore, number 71,936, which is on your docket today for trial of the Community Property Partition pursuant to R.S. 9:2801. After extensive pre-trial conference and continuing ongoing negotiation between the parties, the parties have reached a compromise of this partition, which I will attempt to dictate into the record with Mr. Kitchens following me closely and ask the Court to approve it. Number one, we are going -- the parties are going to agree to divide the

Issue The issue in Helvering v. Gregory is the plaintiff, Helvering, requesting an appeal for a prior decision which expunged Gregory’s (defendant) deficiency in income taxes (The court favored with Gregory in that case.) Helvering v. Gregory is in appeals court – U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Facts Guy T. Helvering – Plaintiff (Commissioner of Internal Revenue) Evelyn F. Gregory – (Defendant) Taxpayer Gregory was the owner of all shares of United Mortgage Company. United Mortgage owned

McKichan v. St. Louis Hockey Club, L.P. was a personal injury case filed on March 17, 1998, in which the plaintiff claimed that the defendant club should be held vicariously liable for their employee’s actions that caused the plaintiff’s injury. The injury in question occurred in Peoria, Illinois during an IHL game on December 15, 1990 between the Peoria Rivermen and the Milwaukee Admirals. While the St. Louis Hockey Club technically wasn’t playing in the game, they can be held liable for the injury

In the case sub judice, we are called upon to adopt one of two polarized positions by holding either that this is one of the infrequent instances where a trial court has abused the discretion vested in it, or, alternatively, we are asked to endorse the equally exceptional position that this is the first “unusual and compelling circumstance” since the Court of Appeals adopted this articulation of the rule in 1975. A. S. Abell Co., 274 Md. at 721. After weighing the considerations that are woven

Keywords: complex contract dispute in Florida, limited liability company lawsuits in Florida, settlement counselor in Florida, disputes mediator in Florida Preparing to Mediate a Complex Contract Dispute in Florida Mediating a complex contract dispute in Florida may seem overwhelming, even for the most experienced attorneys. Complex contract disputes may involve multiple businesses and individuals, as well as the careful analysis of various contract terms. Many complex contract disputes in Florida

I. Burke exhausted her administrative remedies because the retaliation claim is an exception under administrative requirements as it grew out of the allegations from the initial EEOC claim. 　　“Filing a timely charge is a prerequisite to having an actionable claim.” Nat 'l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 120 (2002). A plaintiff must file charges with the EEOC for either discriminatory or retaliatory acts no later than 180 or 300 days after their occurrence. Id. at 122. Untimely claims