Laws of war

The laws of war The IHL and Geneva conventions are mainly known as the organizations that keep morals and sense in armed conflicts otherwise known as wars. These organizations place laws during war, if these laws hadn't been put in place during 1949 I don't think many of us would be here today. The main international agreements are the four Geneva Conventions of 1949. Nearly every country in the world is part of these treaties, they protect four different categories of war victims – the wounded

for a just war includes that war must be declared by proper authority, antagonist must be notified of the war declaration, and the antagonists must be given the opportunity to make peace before war begins. These are the necessary conditions for jus ad bellum. When a just war will begin, proper authorities must declare the war to the public. It must be a person of official purpose in the state, not a random citizen. The antagonist must be notified of the war and not blind sided by war in any type

The laws of war consist of specific guidelines that should be followed before declaring a war. These laws consist of five rules to follow by; Just cause which is another way of saying self defense, Pro proportionality which means even if you have a cause you should not go to war if the outcomes are worse than what you set out to accomplish, non- combatant immunity is the rule that we should not fight against unarmed and harmless civilians, treatment for prisoners and last but not least the against

1. What is a Just War? When is it justifiable for nations to used organized violence against other nations or terrorist groups? The central claim of just war theorists is that war is a bad thing, but under certain circumstances, it may be justified or even obligatory. They believe, that there must be some constrains on the conduct of war. In other words, just war theory states, that the use of force must be regulated by a set of mutually agreed rules of combat. Just war theory is built on principles

created or restricted, challenging the long established international humanitarian laws. (Allenby) Technology changes more rapidly than we might expect. In the 65 years since the Geneva Conventions was written, military technologies have changed drastically. Technologies of today’s battlefields might be able to slip though loopholes in the international humanitarian laws, making them and their users safe from prosecution of war crimes. Although modern military technologies such as directed energy weapons

causes for war are derived from the ideas of philosophers before him, primarily Augustine and Aristotle. Aquinas’s just causes for war are if it is “declared by the authority of a head of a state for good reason and with a morally good aim” (Christopher 50). This statement can be broken down into three key conditions; proper authority, just cause and right intentions. The first component; proper authority, states that only the highest of authority can declare war. If the person who declares war has to

Regan explains that just war theorists have developed two major ideologies to understand the just war conduct. First, the principle of discrimination that just warriors may directly target people participating in the enemy nations wrongdoing but should not target other enemy nationals. "The enemy nation's wrongdoing justifies the victim nation's use of military force will necessarily involve targeting enemy personal engaged in the wrongdoing (Regan, pp 88)." The principle of discrimination requires

Phil 340 Morality of War and Peace Exam #1 For Aquinas, there are three conditions for Just War. The first is that the war must be declared by authority of a head of state or a proper authority. The requirement for a war to be declared comes from the Roman law. There is no specific time limit between hostile activities and the declaration, but the act of declaring war does invite the second party to the pending hostilities for the opportunity to offer redress in lieu of war. An aggrieving nation

generally. During World War II, the rest of the world believed that all individuals of German descent were liable, however not all Germans were involved in this case. There were numerous Germans who really restricted Hitler and helped the Jews, while others just stayed unbiased. This concludes that it is not a good idea for them to face charges for something they didn't commit. The three charges laid against the defendants by the prosecutor were: crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against

stages of Just War Theory. Jus ad Bellum pertains to the ethics of starting a just war, with the principles being having just cause, being a last resort, being declared by a proper authority, possessing right intention, having a reasonable chance of success, and the end being proportional to the means used. Jus in Bello covers the conduct of individuals at war, with discrimination and proportionality being the guidelines. Meaning, only use force against legitimate targets in war, and only use an