● Write the precondition axioms for the actions.

Database System Concepts
7th Edition
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Chapter1: Introduction
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PE
icon
Related questions
Question

 (Ex.1 in Ch14 of the book KRR) Blocks World Imagine that we have a collection
of blocks on a table and a robot arm that is capable of picking up blocks and putting them
elsewhere, as shown in Figure 1.

We assume that the robot arm can hold at most one block at a time. We also assume that
the robot can only pick up a block if there is no other block on top of it. Finally, we assume
that a block can only support or be supported by at most one other block, but that the table
surface is large enough that all blocks can be directly on the table. There are only two actions
available: 

puton(x, y) which picks up block x and moves it onto block y, and
putonTable(x) which moves block x onto the table. 

C
AB
D
В
F
E
Figure 1: The Blocks World
Similarly, we have only two fluents:
On(x, y, s) which holds when block x is on block y, and
OnTable(x, s) which holds when block x is on the table.
Answer the following questions:
• Write the precondition axioms for the actions.
.Write the effect axioms for the actions.
• Show how successor state axioms for the fluents would be derived from these effect axioms.
Argue that the successor state axioms are not logically entailed by the effect axioms by
briefly describing an interpretation where the effect axioms are satisfied but the successor
state ones are not.
• Show how frame axioms are logically entailed by the successor state axioms.
Transcribed Image Text:C AB D В F E Figure 1: The Blocks World Similarly, we have only two fluents: On(x, y, s) which holds when block x is on block y, and OnTable(x, s) which holds when block x is on the table. Answer the following questions: • Write the precondition axioms for the actions. .Write the effect axioms for the actions. • Show how successor state axioms for the fluents would be derived from these effect axioms. Argue that the successor state axioms are not logically entailed by the effect axioms by briefly describing an interpretation where the effect axioms are satisfied but the successor state ones are not. • Show how frame axioms are logically entailed by the successor state axioms.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Bare Bones Programming Language
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780078022159
Author:
Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780134444321
Author:
Tony Gaddis
Publisher:
PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780132737968
Author:
Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:
PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780133976892
Author:
Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:
PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337627900
Author:
Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic Controllers
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780073373843
Author:
Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education