Use the following to answer questions (19) - (21): Suppose a monopolist faces the following market demand equation: Q= 200 - 2P, where Q is the quantity demanded and P is the price charged to all customers. Furthermore, suppose the firm faces the following total cost (TC): TC - s0Q. (19] Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price discrimination, then the cumulative amount the firm should sell equals: А. 20 В. 40 С. 80 D. 100 (20] Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price discrimination, then consumer surplus equals: S1200 $625 A. В. C. $400 D. None of the above (21) Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price discrimination, then the firm's profit will exceed $2000. А. True В. False is suggestive of a firm engaging in [22] According to the Areeda-Turner rule, pricing below predatory pricing. А. total revenue average total cost average variable cost All of the above В. C. D. (23] Increases in concentration increase price-cost margins by enhancing cooperation among firms. This is accounted for by the Differential Collusion Hypothesis. A. True В. False [24] Adopting a "meet the competition" clause makes it more difficult to sustain cooperation, since the incentive for a firm to secretly cut its price (below an agreed upon price) increases. А. В. True False

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter14: Monopoly
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 14.9P
icon
Related questions
Question

need help on 22-24

Use the following to answer questions (19) - (21):
Suppose a monopolist faces the following market demand equation: Q= 200 - 2P, where Q is the quantity
demanded and P is the price charged to all customers. Furthermore, suppose the firm faces the following
total cost (TC): TC = 50Q.
[19]
discrimination, then the cumulative amount the firm should sell equals:
Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price
A.
20
В.
40
С.
80
D.
100
[20]
discrimination, then consumer surplus equals:
Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price
$1200
$625
A.
В.
С.
$400
D.
None of the above
[21]
discrimination, then the firm's profit will exceed $2000.
Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price
A.
True
В.
False
[22]
predatory pricing.
According to the Areeda-Turner rule, pricing below
is suggestive of a firm engaging in
A.
total revenue
В.
average total cost
average variable cost
All of the above
С.
D.
[23]
is accounted for by the Differential Collusion Hypothesis.
Increases in concentration increase price-cost margins by enhancing cooperation among firms. This
A.
True
В.
False
[24]
incentive for a firm to secretly cut its price (below an agreed upon price) increases.
Adopting a “meet the competition" clause makes it more difficult to sustain cooperation, since the
A.
True
В.
False
Transcribed Image Text:Use the following to answer questions (19) - (21): Suppose a monopolist faces the following market demand equation: Q= 200 - 2P, where Q is the quantity demanded and P is the price charged to all customers. Furthermore, suppose the firm faces the following total cost (TC): TC = 50Q. [19] discrimination, then the cumulative amount the firm should sell equals: Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price A. 20 В. 40 С. 80 D. 100 [20] discrimination, then consumer surplus equals: Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price $1200 $625 A. В. С. $400 D. None of the above [21] discrimination, then the firm's profit will exceed $2000. Rather than charge the same price to every consumer, if this firm can practice first degree price A. True В. False [22] predatory pricing. According to the Areeda-Turner rule, pricing below is suggestive of a firm engaging in A. total revenue В. average total cost average variable cost All of the above С. D. [23] is accounted for by the Differential Collusion Hypothesis. Increases in concentration increase price-cost margins by enhancing cooperation among firms. This A. True В. False [24] incentive for a firm to secretly cut its price (below an agreed upon price) increases. Adopting a “meet the competition" clause makes it more difficult to sustain cooperation, since the A. True В. False
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Comparative Advantage
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
Economics For Today
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613040
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Survey Of Economics
Survey Of Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781337111522
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics:
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:
9781285859460
Author:
BOYES, William
Publisher:
Cengage Learning