Trifecta Distributors has decided to discontinue manufacturing its X Plus model. Currently, the company has 4,600 partially completed X Plus models on hand. The government has put a recall on a particular part in the X Plus model, so each base model must now be reworked to accommodate the style of the new part. The company has spent $111 per unit to manufacture these X Plus models to their current state. Reworking each X Plus model will cost $20 for materials and $19 for direct labor. In addition, $8 of variable overhead and $33 of allocated fixed overhead (relating primarily to depreciation of plant and equipment) will be allocated per unit. If Trifecta completes the X Plus models, it can sell them for $160 per unit. On the other hand, another manufacturer is. interested in purchasing the partially completed units for $104 each and converting them into Z Plus models. Prepare a differential analysis per unit to determine if Trifecta should complete the X Plus models or sell them in their current state. Differential revenue per unit Differential costs: Materials Direct labor Variable overhead Differential benefit per unit Trifecta should the X Plus models.

Trifecta Distributors has decided to discontinue manufacturing its X Plus model. Currently, the company has 4,600 partially completed X Plus models on hand. The government has put a recall on a particular part in the X Plus model, so each base model must now be reworked to accommodate the style of the new part. The company has spent $111 per unit to manufacture these X Plus models to their current state. Reworking each X Plus model will cost $20 for materials and $19 for direct labor. In addition, $8 of variable overhead and $33 of allocated fixed overhead (relating primarily to depreciation of plant and equipment) will be allocated per unit. If Trifecta completes the X Plus models, it can sell them for $160 per unit. On the other hand, another manufacturer is. interested in purchasing the partially completed units for $104 each and converting them into Z Plus models. Prepare a differential analysis per unit to determine if Trifecta should complete the X Plus models or sell them in their current state. Differential revenue per unit Differential costs: Materials Direct labor Variable overhead Differential benefit per unit Trifecta should the X Plus models.

Principles of Accounting Volume 2

19th Edition

ISBN:9781947172609

Author:OpenStax

Publisher:OpenStax

Chapter10: Short-term Decision Making

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 7PA: Trifecta Distributors has decided to discontinue manufacturing its X Plus model. Currently, the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Trifecta Distributors has decided to discontinue manufacturing its X Plus model. Currently, the company has 4,600 partially completed X Plus models on hand. The government has put a recall on a particular part in the X Plus model, so each base model must now be reworked to accommodate the style of the new part. The company has spent $110 per unit to manufacture these X Plus models to their current state. Reworking each X Plus model will cost $20 for materials and $20 for direct labor. In addition, $7 of variable overhead and $32 of allocated fixed overhead (relating primarily to depreciation of plant and equipment) will be allocated per unit. Il Trifecta completes the X Plus models, it can sell them for $160 per unit. On the other hand, another manufacturer is interested in purchasing the partially completed units for $104 each and converting them into Z Plus models. Prepare a differential analysis per unit to determine if Trifecta should complete the X Plus models or sell them in their current state.
Trifecta Distributors has decided to discontinue manufacturing its X Plus model. Currently, the company has 4,500 partially completed X Plus models on hand. The government has put a recall on a particular part in the X Plus model, so each base model must now be reworked to accommodate the style of the new part. The company has spent $110 per unit to manufacture these X Plus models to their current state. Reworking each X Plus model will cost $21 for materials and $20 for direct labor. In addition, $6 of variable overhead and $32 of allocated fixed overhead (relating primarily to depreciation of plant and equipment) will be allocated per unit. If Trifecta completes the X Plus models, it can sell them for $160 per unit. On the other hand, another manufacturer is interested in purchasing the partially completed units for $104 each and converting them into Z Plus models. Prepare a differential analysis per unit to determine if Trifecta should complete the X Plus models or sell them in…
InteliSystems manufactures an optical switch that it uses in its final product. InteliSystems incurred the following manufacturing costs when it produced 70,000 units last year: E (Click the icon to view the manufacturing costs.) InteliSystems does not yet know how many switches it will need this year; however, another company has offered to sell InteliSystems the switch for $8.50 per unit. If InteliSystems buys the switch from the outside supplier, the manufacturing facilities that will be idle cannot be used for any other purpose, yet none of the fixed costs are avoidable. Read the requirements. Requirement 1. Given the same cost structure, should InteliSystems make or buy the switch? Show your analysis. Complete an incremental analysis to show whether InteliSystems should make or buy the switch. (Enter a "O" for any zero amounts. Round amounts to the nearest cent. Use a minus sign or parentheses when the cost to buy exceeds the cost to make.) InteliSystems Incremental Analysis for…
Management of Plascencia Corporation is considering whether to purchase a new model 370 machine costing $511,000 or a new model 220 machine costing $471,000 to replace a machine that was purchased 7 years ago for $503,000. The old machine was used to make product I43L until it broke down last week. Unfortunately, the old machine cannot be repaired. Management has decided to buy the new model 220 machine. It has less capacity than the new model 370 machine, but its capacity is sufficient to continue making product I43L. Management also considered, but rejected, the alternative of simply dropping product I43L. If that were done, instead of investing $471,000 in the new machine, the money could be invested in a project that would return a total of $479,000. In making the decision to invest in the model 220 machine, the opportunity cost was: Multiple Choice $503,000 $471,000 $511,000 $479,000
WorldSystems manufactures an optical switch that it uses in its final product. WorldSystems incurred the following manufacturing costs when it produced 72,000 units last year: WorldSystems does not yet know how many switches it will need this year; however, another company has offered to sell WorldSystems $11.50 per unit. If WorldSystems buys the switch from the outside supplier, the manufacturing facilities that will be idle cannot be used fe purpose, yet none of the fixed costs are avoidable. E (Click the icon to view the manufacturing costs.) Read the reguirements. Requirement 1. Given the same cost structure, should WorldSystems make or buy the switch? Show your analysis. Complete an incremental analysis to show whether WorldSystems should make or buy the switch. (Enter a "0" for any zero amounts. Round amounts to the nearest cent. Use a minus sign or parentheses when the cost to buy exceeds the cost to make.) World Systems Incremental Analysis for Outsourcing Decision - X Make Buy…
Management of Plascencia Corporation is considering whether to purchase a new model 370 machine costing $502,000 or a new model 220 machine costing $443,000 to replace a machine that was purchased 11 years ago for $470,000. The old machine was used to make product I43L until it broke down last week. Unfortunately, the old machine cannot be repaired.Management has decided to buy the new model 220 machine. It has less capacity than the new model 370 machine, but its capacity is sufficient to continue making product I43L.Management also considered, but rejected, the alternative of simply dropping product I43L. If that were done, instead of investing $443,000 in the new machine, the money could be invested in a project that would return a total of $487,000.In making the decision to buy the model 220 machine rather than the model 370 machine, the differential cost was: A: 59,000 B: 27,000 C: 32,000 D: 17,000
Management of Plascencia Corporation is considering whether to purchase a new model 370 machine costing $536,000 or a new model 220 machine costing $463,000 to replace a machine that was purchased 9 years ago for $484,000. The old machine was used to make product 143L until it broke down last week. Unfortunately, the old machine cannot be repaired. Management has decided to buy the new model 220 machine. It has less capacity than the new model 370 machine, but its capacity is sufficient to continue making product 143L. Management also considered, but rejected, the alternative of simply dropping product 143L. If that were done, instead of investing $463,000 in the new machine, the money could be invested in a project that would return a total of $488,000. In making the decision to buy the model 220 machine rather than the model 370 machine, the sunk cost was: Multiple Choice $484,000 $463,000 $536,000 $488,000
Management of NUBD Corporation is considering whether to purchase a new model L37 machine costing P360,000 or a new model L20 machine costing P340,000 to replace a machine that was purchased 7 years ago for P348,000. The old machine was used to make product LUV until it broke down last week. Unfortunately, the old machine cannot be repaired.Management has decided to buy the new model L20 machine. It has less capacity than the new model L37 machine, but its capacity is sufficient to continue making product LUV.Management also considered, but rejected, the alternative of simply dropping product LUV. If that were done, instead of investing P340,000 in the new machine, the money could be invested in a project that would return a total of P225,000. In making the decision to invest in the model L20 machine, the opportunity cost was:
Cari Heat (CH) Ltd. is currently faced with a critical decision regarding its productionequipment. Cari Heat (CH) is evaluating two options for its production equipment:upgrading or replacing. The company manufactures and sells 7,500 heaters every year, eachpriced at $920. The current production equipment, which was acquired at a cost of$2,150,000, has been in use for just two years and is subject to straight-line depreciation overa five-year useful life. Furthermore, it possesses no terminal disposal value, but it can becurrently sold for $650,000.The following table presents data for the two alternatives:A B C1 Choice Upgrade Replace2 One-time equipment costs $3,500,000 $5,200,0003 Variable manufacturing cost per Heater $180 $904 Remaining useful life of equipment (years) 3 35 Terminal disposal value of equipmentRequired0 01. Prepare a schedule, for the remaining 3 years, reflecting whether CH should upgrade itsproduction line or replace it? 2. Assuming that all other data are as…
Management of NUBD Corporation is considering whether to purchase a new model L37 machine costing 360,000 or a new model L20 machine costing 340,000 to replace a machine that was purchased 7 years ago for 348,000. The old machine was used to make product LUV until it broke down last week. Unfortunately, the old machine cannot be repaired. Management has decided to buy the new model L20 machine. It has less capacity than the new model L37 machine, but its capacity is sufficient to continue making product LUV. Management also considered, but rejected, the alternative of simply dropping product LUV. If that were done, instead of investing 340,000 in the new machine, the money could be invested in a project that would return a total of 250,000. In making the decision to invest in the model L20 machine, the opportunity cost was?
InteliSystems manufactures an optical switch that it uses in its final product. InteliSystems incurred the following manufacturing costs when it produced 70,000 units last year as shown in the chart below: InteliSystems does not yet know how many switches it will need this year; however, another company has offered to sell InteliSystems the switch for $8.50 per unit. If InteliSystems buys the switch from the outside supplier, the manufacturing facilities that will be idle cannot be used for any other purpose; yet none of the fixed costs are avoidable. Requirements 1. Given the same cost structure, should InteliSystems make or buy the switch? Show your analysis. 2. Now, assume that InteliSystems can avoid $105,000 of fixed costs a year by outsourcing production. In addition, because sales are increasing, InteliSystems needs 75,000 switches a year rather than 70,000 switches. What should the company do now? 3. Given the last scenario, what is the most InteliSystems would be willing to…
Kim Yin Company has 15,000 units in inventory that had a production cost of $3 per unit. These units cannot be sold through normal channels due to a significant technology change. These units could be reworked at a total cost of $23,000and sold for $28,000. Another alternative is to sell the units to a junk dealer for $8,500. Should Kim Yin Company scrap or rework the units? By how much will they be better off? Please provide the answers as well as the solutions to the questions. Thank you!