number of moving glasses by half. Here is another classical problem similar to the one just described but a little more difficult. There are n things lined up next to another n things like this : XXX.....OOO........ However, we define a different way to "move", where you can only move any pair of neighbouring items to an empty space in a row, and you can't change the left-right order of the items. Then, let we think, it is meaningless when n=1, and when n=2 it is no answer. When n=3,the solution process is as follows. XXXOOO XOOOXX XOO XOX OXOXOX ,it should look like this, and we can move .. So when n > 2,we should at least move n times to solve the problem, could you formulate the solution process for n greater than or equal to 3?

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter10: Matrices
Section10.1: Solution Of Linear Systems
Problem 43E: On National Public Radio, the "Weekend Edition" program on Sunday, July 29, 2001, posed the...
icon
Related questions
Question
number of moving glasses by half. Here is another classical problem similar to the one just
described but a little more difficult. There are n things lined up next to another n things like this :
XXX.....OOO........ However, we define a different way to "move", where you can only move any
pair of neighbouring items to an empty space in a row, and you can't change the left-right order
of the items. Then, let we think, it is meaningless when n=1, and when n=2 it is no answer. When
n=3,the solution process is as follows.
XXXOOO
XOOOXX
XOO XOX
OXOXOX
,it should look like this, and we can move ..
So when n > 2,we should at least move n times to solve the problem, could you formulate the
solution process for n greater than or equal to 3?
Transcribed Image Text:number of moving glasses by half. Here is another classical problem similar to the one just described but a little more difficult. There are n things lined up next to another n things like this : XXX.....OOO........ However, we define a different way to "move", where you can only move any pair of neighbouring items to an empty space in a row, and you can't change the left-right order of the items. Then, let we think, it is meaningless when n=1, and when n=2 it is no answer. When n=3,the solution process is as follows. XXXOOO XOOOXX XOO XOX OXOXOX ,it should look like this, and we can move .. So when n > 2,we should at least move n times to solve the problem, could you formulate the solution process for n greater than or equal to 3?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 1 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus For The Life Sciences
Calculus
ISBN:
9780321964038
Author:
GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:
Pearson Addison Wesley,
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra and Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305071742
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
Algebra for College Students
Algebra for College Students
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285195780
Author:
Jerome E. Kaufmann, Karen L. Schwitters
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Intermediate Algebra
Intermediate Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285195728
Author:
Jerome E. Kaufmann, Karen L. Schwitters
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage