A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y estimated regression equation ŷ = 53.0 - 0.180x. (a) How would you interpret b = -0.180? = fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. (b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.) An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100. (c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine? = Why do you think this has occurred? This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. (d) Interpret r² = 0.690 in the context of this problem. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. (e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem. e This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

13.1.2

A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y
estimated regression equation ŷ
= 53.0 - 0.180x.
(a) How would you interpret b
= -0.180?
=
fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the
For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg.
For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower.
For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower.
For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg.
For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower.
(b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.)
An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100.
A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35.
A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100.
An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35.
An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100.
(c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine?
=
Why do you think this has occurred?
This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample.
This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample.
This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
Transcribed Image Text:A sample of small cars was selected, and the values of x = horsepower and y estimated regression equation ŷ = 53.0 - 0.180x. (a) How would you interpret b = -0.180? = fuel efficiency (mpg) were determined for each car. Fitting the simple linear regression model gave the For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency decreases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower increases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit decrease in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. For each one-unit increase in horsepower the predicted fuel efficiency increases by 0.180 mpg. For each one-unit increase in mpg the predicted horsepower decreases by 0.180 horsepower. (b) Substituting x = 100 gives ŷ = 35. Give two different interpretations of this number. (Select all that apply.) An estimate of the horsepower when the fuel efficiency is 100. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 35. A prediction for the fuel efficiency of a car whose horsepower is 100. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 35. An estimate of the mean fuel efficiency when the horsepower is 100. (c) What is the predicted efficiency for a car with a 300-horsepower engine? = Why do you think this has occurred? This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for the small cars used in the sample. This result is valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car. This result cannot be valid, and has probably occurred because 300 is outside the range of the horsepower ratings for a car.
(d) Interpret r²
= 0.690 in the context of this problem.
This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency.
(e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem.
e
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
Transcribed Image Text:(d) Interpret r² = 0.690 in the context of this problem. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 69.0% of the variation in fuel efficiency is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. This tells us that 31.0% of the variation in horsepower is attributable to the approximate linear relationship between horsepower and fuel efficiency. (e) Interpret s = 2.0 in the context of this problem. e This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical average of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the fuel efficiency of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 mpg is a typical deviation of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line. This tells us that 2 horsepower is a typical average of the horsepower of a car in the sample from the value predicted by the least-squares line.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman