3. (4) Two top shoe design houses, Vivace, and Mortissimo, can play it safe in the fall shows in Milan and introduce variations on last year's themes; buyers will accept these because they were successful before. Or they can take a chance and introduce something more daring. The firms compete with each other (no collusion) and their choices concerning shoe design affect each others' profits. The payoffs for the "take a chance" or "play it safe" strategies are shown below: Payoffs: Profits Vivace Mortissimo Strategy Take a chance Play it safe Take a chance $3, $3 $2, $7 Play it safe $7, $2 $6, $6 a) Mortissimo's dominant strategy is: Play it safe Take a chance Mortisimo, does not have a dominant strategy Check any of the outcomes that represent a Nash equilibrium: b) Upper left Upper right Lower left Lower right c) Going back to the original situation, suppose that the Italian government imposes a tax of $2 on any firm that takes a chance, and assume for simplicity that any firm taking a chance would absorb the full $2, lowering payoffs, rather than passing it on to customers. Are the firms better off or worse off? Explain. (Hint: consider the payoffs netted for the tax.)
3. (4) Two top shoe design houses, Vivace, and Mortissimo, can play it safe in the fall shows in Milan and introduce variations on last year's themes; buyers will accept these because they were successful before. Or they can take a chance and introduce something more daring. The firms compete with each other (no collusion) and their choices concerning shoe design affect each others' profits. The payoffs for the "take a chance" or "play it safe" strategies are shown below: Payoffs: Profits Vivace Mortissimo Strategy Take a chance Play it safe Take a chance $3, $3 $2, $7 Play it safe $7, $2 $6, $6 a) Mortissimo's dominant strategy is: Play it safe Take a chance Mortisimo, does not have a dominant strategy Check any of the outcomes that represent a Nash equilibrium: b) Upper left Upper right Lower left Lower right c) Going back to the original situation, suppose that the Italian government imposes a tax of $2 on any firm that takes a chance, and assume for simplicity that any firm taking a chance would absorb the full $2, lowering payoffs, rather than passing it on to customers. Are the firms better off or worse off? Explain. (Hint: consider the payoffs netted for the tax.)
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
8th Edition
ISBN:9781305971493
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw
Chapter17: Oligopoly
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 9PA
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305971493
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning