CU2948 Facilitate the Development of Effective Group Practice in Health and Social Care or Children and Young People’s Settings 1.1 Analyse the impact of theories and models on group work practice Groups may be defined in many ways, indeed providing an absolute definition of a group, as with much of the theory around group work, is highly problematic and contestable. However for the purposes of discussing groupwork within a context of working with young people we may define a group as a small gathering of young people. Group work may simplistically be described as the study and application of the processes and outcomes experienced when a small group comes together. Konopka (1963) defines groupwork as a method of social work that is …show more content…
For example both the YAM and PTV groups I had experience with were set up to encourage social interaction and personal development. Having an awareness of group stage theory enabled my colleagues and myself to structure the early encounters for the groups to be; a) fun and enjoyable – to encourage continued attendance; b) relaxed - offering the promotion of effective communication and allowing members to get to know each other a little whilst gaining in confidence and trust. To this end ice breakers, introduction and communication exercisers such as those provided by Brandes and Phillips (1979), Bond (1986), Leech and Wooster (1986) and Dearling and Armstrong (1994) were used. As Dynes describes `[games] stimulate the imagination, make people resourceful and help develop social ability and co-operation` (Dynes, 1990). Stage 2: Storming This stage sees group members begin to confront each other as they begin to vie for roles within the group that will help them to belong and to feel valued. Thus as members begin to assert their individual personalities, the comfort of the forming stage begins to come under siege. Members experience personal, intra and inter group conflicts. Aggression and resentment may manifest in this stage and thus if strong personalities emerge and leadership is unresponsive to group and individual needs, the situation may become destructive to the
The forming stage is characterized by dependency, and need for acceptance and guidance. In this stage the "meet and greet" is done. During the meet and greet each member gathers information that will determine the strength of potential relationships amongst group members, as well as establish group hierarchy. Generally, in this stage the leader of group is selected. The group leader has a tendency to be someone that is viewed as stable and
of the members were given and we were asked to finish a project on a
Norming – during this stage the trust and respect is developing amongst the members of the group, since it becomes clear that each member has a role and they are aware of what
For example, the forming stage deals with binding the group, so that the group members get to know each other and begin to have a sense of what an actual team looks like. It also focuses on aligning the individual purposes so that they reinforce each other’s goals as if they have shared targets. Moreover, the roles of the leader are also established here.
Since much of our time is spend in groups, it is helpful to work in groups because it will give an opportunity to improve their human functioning. Group work helps to develop individual skills in communication, relationship building and asserting oneself
The Performing stage was the last stage of Bruce Tuckman's four stages of group development until the 70's when Tuckman felt the importance to create an additional fifth stage to his model the "adjourning" which became the last stage. A group (shift) reaches the performing when all it members solves the conflict in the Norming stage therefore had establish the norms of the group and the members are operate as one. Thus, the group identity is finalized, in our experience it was a unique one.
Developmental Sequence in Small Groups by Bruce W. Tuckman reveals the four-stage model involved in the development of small groups. The four-stage model consists of forming, storming, norming, and performing. However, in 1977 Tuckman developed a fifth stage of development called adjourning. In order to understand group development, one must first become familiar with the dynamic of a group setting. Group settings impact the way individuals interact with one another.
From what I observed today, I could tell that the facilitator had control over the group because when the veterans would get out of hand (e.g. outburst or arguing) she was able to bring them back to neutral. The veterans respect the facilitator in what she had to say.
The forming stage of a group or team will experience primary tension and social unease that comes with being in a new group. People often being cautious of what they say and doing, making sure to be polite. Storming will have secondary tensions often emerge as member's purse positions of power and influence. They will openly disagree and not be as cautious as before to speak their minds. Norming will resolve status conflicts and establish norms working together as a committed group with one goal in mind. Building trust with one another and developing methods for achieving the common goal. Communication will be more open towards one other. Performing has
The phases of group improvement are Shaping: a gathering of individuals meet up to finish a common reason. Their underlying achievement will rely on upon their commonality with each other's work style, their experience on past groups, and the lucidity of their doled out mission.
Group development begins with the forming stage where members ask questions, get to know each other and discover acceptable behaviors. The storming stage, or second step, is the period where there may be emotional outbreaks and tension within the group. This progresses to the third or norming stage where team members start to work together as a unit, the performing stage where the team is well integrated and functioning as a team. And lastly the adjourning stage when the team is ending as a group and group accomplishments are celebrated.
The genesis and growth of a group always goes through five stages: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. Forming is always the first stage, where the group members meet for the first time and roles as well as structure and purpose are not firmly established. This stage closes when the individuals label themselves as a group. Appropriately named, the storming stage is defined by intragroup conflict in the areas of limited autonomy and leadership, and is a critical in group development. The resolution of this stage comes with a visible leader along with rankings of group members. After the dust has settled, the norming stage begins with development of cohesiveness, close relationships, and ends
STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT the model presented by Tuckman and Jensen "studies "... theory groups, human relations training or T-Groups, and natural and laboratory –task groups have two realms-task and interpersonal" (Tuckman & Jensen p. 280). It suggests that team's growth occurs in stages with each dissimilar through each level of development. Tuckman, identifies four stages of team development referred to as, forming-which occurs when individuals are introduced and brought together for a purpose. Storming members' strained relationships and conflict, about disagreement about a task, vision and/or approach of a shared purpose, norming where unconsciously or consciously working relationship members come to a consensus. Finally, performing team expecting
These are forming, conforming, storming and performing. During the forming stage, team members become acquainted with one another and learn the purpose for the team. Relationships between the members must be established and trust begins to form. Goals for the group are established and rules and expectations are clarified. In this stage, a leader usually emerges.
Small groups are very important as it allows for boundless and healthy growth. According to Yalom, group helps build confidence through risking new behavior that can carry over into their social environment. Group as defined by the School of Social work is a number of individuals with a share sense of identity or who are bounded together by interaction with each other. Group is composed of individuals, persons with their own persona dealing with a problem. Groups are also good at combining talents and providing innovative solutions to possible unconventional situation