Why Did Nixon Agree To Meet Elvis In The Oval Office Of The White House

2. List the questions raised about this situation or that you think that the investigators should ask of

With a small group, discuss the following questions. Choose someone to read the question out loud, and direct the discussion so that each person can offer his/her opinion on the topic. Have another student record the group’s response and choose a third student to report the information gathered to the class in a discussion.

1.4 Explain why it is important to be clear about the purpose and desired outcomes for the group

2. Outline: Briefly outline your essay. MAke sure you provide evidence from the text to support your claim.

2. Using the evidence you found during your reading, summarize the background of this case in three complete sentences.

The evidence for this task could be presented in the form of a written report or presentation. If a presentation is the form chosen to present the evidence, you must include a witness statement from the assessor/tutor and use the following points as guidelines:

2. List the questions raised about this situation or that you think that the investigators should ask of the

What evidence will you gather at the beginning of the lesson, during the lesson, and/or at the end of the lesson that will show the extent to which the students have made progress toward the academic learning objective(s)? Attach rubric or scoring guide as appropriate.

• 2) the narration would offer background material on the case at hand • 3) the partition would divide the case and make clear which part or parts the speaker was going to address, which parts the speaker would not take up and what order would be followed in the development • 4) the confirmation would offer points to substantiate the argument and provide reasons, details, illustrations, and examples in support • 5) the refutation would consider possible objections to the argument and try to counter these • 6) the peroration would draw together the entire argument and include material designed to compel the audience to think or act in a way related to the central argument

My goal will be to present detailed evidence that will not only show the purposes the author wants to express to the readers. For instance, my claim that the lessons he

Based on your Week 3 collaborative learning team discussion, submit, individually, a 350- to 700-word summary of the

Read the following short essay, and then write a 3-5 page response (12-point font, double-spaced, normal margins, no cover page, no binders). Your response should do the following three things: (1) state what the main conclusion of the essay is; (2) state what the most important premises (including sub-conclusions) are—i.e., state which premises are most important if the argument is to rationally convince its audience; (3) evaluate the quality of the argument, giving detailed reasons to justify your evaluation. For purposes of evaluation, assume that the speaker is a contemporary Canadian philosopher and the audience is a group of students in Introduction to Philosophy.

Section Two: Present the position that you most agree with. Then, give ample evidence to

The group discussion has just passed, and it was really a hard work and challenging. There were many precious lessons I got, and, hopefully, so did with my friends. Our group was consisting of four students. As a quantity, reasonably, we had had enough power to do a better work and gained a satisfying result. As I flashed back to the group discussion, it was enriching my memories. Some were in high spirit, remarkable and enjoyable. Opposite to it, few were disappointing.

4. Your group will present and lead the discussion of the question(s) assigned to you. Although the group in charge will be the major discussants for the assigned question(s), it is highly recommended to have the rest of the class involved and participated in the discussion.