Summary of Funds of Knowledge and Teaching other Peoples Children
Two sets of opposing idealss
Education does not just take place in schools. Classrooms are places where many forms of discourses come together. Students and teachers with various forms of knowledge and ways of communicating interact together and unfortunately some ways of knowing and communicating hold more value than others. Sometimes researcher should stop looking at the bigger picture; capitalist economies and the true nature of society should become more of a focus in education research. You cannot hope to understand why students from lower socio economic areas do poorly compared to students whose parents are more affluent unless more is done to understand the prior.
…show more content…
This has been called deficit theory. There has been much critique about this theory because it fails to bring into focus the influence of the school. Home and school are not separate entities when considering student success. They need to work symbiotically.
Schooling in Australia reproduces and exists to reproduce the structure of inequality we see in class and sex. Social stratification is endorsed by the secular, free and compulsory schooling that is provided in Australian society (Connell, et al., 1986). There is a lack of social mobility through education, especially in capitalist economies, this can be attributed to Government policy and how it tends to increase educational inequality rather than reduce it.
Private and government schooling in Australia look and sound differently from one another. The setting I will research is a public school but it has elements that are described by Connell, et al. (1986) as belonging to the private sector. While the government schools are noisy and messy the independent schools are quieter and have order. Connell, et al. (1986, p. 79) they describe the independent schools as having "grounds are carefully planted and cultivated and punctiliously clean". "All the kids wear uniform and all the uniforms are neat". In this research students from government schools found that the work got harder as they
The drivers and causes of the inequality of education has to do with the government funding of public schools in the United States. There are many communities where public schools are underfunded and do not have enough resources to properly educate all of their students. While the richer people of these communities have the ability
Outline and assess the view that the role of education system is to justify and reproduce social inequalities (50)
In this article the author explains how the schools are based on a class system and higher-class areas have better recourses and more classes offered. Higher-class societies have better equipment, new technology, modern facilities, better books, and better teachers. Not only are the school’s educational facilities better the extracurricular activities are also better. For example sports facilities, training facilities, band, art, all because these lower class schools cant afford what these lower class schools can. Students in lower end districts are actually ending up worse off then the higher end students. Meaning attrition rate, drop out rate, sat scores and much more.
Expansion of education is closely related to idealistic views of democracy. In developing and wealthy nations, education is valued because it helps the individual mind to develop capabilities. In contrast, education has also been seen as a way to promote equality. Having access to public education, in theory, has the potential to reduce poverty and promote equality. If all are entitled to the same public education, not to mention they are required by law, why do school systems seem segregate their students? Researchers have searched for the answer and have theorized that economic background, tracking, and hidden curriculum are a few things that help contribute to the imaginary lines drawn between students in society.
Socioeconomic status plays a key factor in the type of education a child receives today and ultimately functions to keep individuals in the class they are born into. Those who are part of the lower class receive the bare minimum in education with the end goal being blind obedience, while the upper class is educated in a way that encourages self-regulation, individual thought, and creativity. These vast differences in education are no mistake and are put in place for overall control.
This essay will analyse via the sociological imagination, ‘whose interests does schooling serve and why?’ In addressing this question, one needs to discuss why is an education so valued in Australia today.
Kenway’s article Challenging Inequality in Australia: Gonski and Beyond is a critical analysis of how Australian governments have evaluated and responded to the issue of educational disadvantage. The piece primarily focuses its critique on how the Review of Funding for Schooling Final Report (Gonski et al, 2011) recognises, and presents solutions for, educational disadvantage within the national education system. The central argument is that, despite the report’s shortcomings, it should be supported as it emphasises issues of socio-educational disadvantage which urgently need to be addressed. It is noted that the Gonski Report, in its description of the “imperatives” of addressing educational disadvantage, reminds the reader that Australian
The government supports the education system by offering public primary and secondary schooling for all Australian children. Tertiary education is available following secondary schooling and this is also subsidised. Students still need to pay for this but they can pay as they go or defer payments till after graduating and when earing over $50,000 a year.
The first goal is Australian schooling promotes equity and excellences. This establishes that socioeconomic weakness eases to be important determinant of educational developments. It also adds to decrease the repercussions of other sources of weakness, such as refugee status.
Richer areas have better schools, smaller classes, and have a high level of education. Teachers make more money, so the rich areas have better teachers. Economic inequality is one of the causes of those disparities. Poor students living in poor areas are behind in verbal memory, vocabulary, math and reading. Some children came in the United States without knowing how to speak English. Those immigrant students need a tutor when they attend school. Rich kids’ parents can pay tutor to help their kids, but poor kids’ parents cannot. In public schools, students are getting low education, which does not allow other student to extend their capacity. Being born into a social class, especially the lower class can affect youths’ lives chances, including what kind of education they can get, the work they can have or even how long they will live. This can be classified as an impact of economic inequality.
Students that are in a working-class have the tendency to underachieve in school, in contrast to those students that are middle-class, this is due to external and internal factors. External cultural factors are claimed to be a key cause of social class differences in educational achievement according to various sociologist. These factors consist of Cultural deprivation, cultural capital and material deprivation.
education due to socioeconomic status, is an act of betrayal to children and the profession they
As mentioned earlier there are stereotypes that come with socioeconomic status, including that children from low socioeconomic status families tend to not perform as well in school as children from higher socioeconomic status families. This is not because the children from low socioeconomic status have a deficiency that causes them to underperform, but rather it is because there is an expectation that the children will not do as well and so the children walk into the classroom facing a losing battle (Schmitt-Wilson, 2013, p 228). The education that a child receives in the earliest years of their life sets up a framework for the education through the rest of their lifetime (Stull, 2013, p 54). That being said, if a child does not receive the best education in the earliest years of their schooling, it is not surprising when they do not do as well in school and do not seek higher education after high school. Another common stereotype is that children from low socioeconomic status will not go on to get high paying jobs, but even if this is true it is not
Social class background has a powerful influence on a child’s chances of success in the education system. Children from middle-class families on average perform better than children from working-class families and the gap between middle and working class educational achievement gets bigger as children get older. Internal factors, also known as school factors, these are factors inside the education system, such as a students subcultures, teacher labeling and language codes also affect a child’s achievement in education.
Homeschooled students have consistently scored higher on achievement tests compared to private and public school students. Homeschooled students are also more likely to be exposed to more advanced academic coursework than their traditionally schooled counterparts. A testimonial from a homeschooling parent in Rebecca Kochenderfer and Elizabeth Kanna’s book, Homeschool for Success, states “In their junior year of high school, our oldest two boys also took dual-credit classes at the local