Sex Offenders: Article Analysis

To conclude the findings above, released in The September 2015 Sex Offender Recidivism after Release from Prison report sex offender recidivism rates at three-, five-, ten-, and fifteen year follow up periods. It reports Patterns of sex offender recidivism at each of the follow-up periods decline over time, much like the overall offender population. For instance, from 1992 to 2010, the three-year general recidivism rate for sex offenders decreased by 40%.

Stories of sex offenders have been increasingly a focus of attention by the criminal justice system over the past years. By legal definition, a sex offender “is a person who is convicted of a sexual offense (Sex Offender Law & Legal Definition),” an act which is prohibited by the jurisdiction. What constitutes as a sex offense or normal/abnormal sexual behavior varies over time and place, meaning that it also varies by legal jurisdiction and culture. In the United States of America, for example, a person can be convicted of wide range of sexual behavior that includes prostitution, incest, sex with a minor, rape, and other sex offenses (Sex Offender Law & Legal Definition). As the nature of sex crimes have long held the

The conclusion of the case study is that sexual offenders that score 23 or higher on the limbic system checklist indicates that they have dysfunction disorder on the limbic system. If an offender has 23 or less on the limbic checklist indicates that they are less likely to be sex offender. The outcome of the case study is 33 percent of the inmates was found to have dysfunction disorder on the limbic system. MMI report the inmates that are in the f category has mental problems and dysfunctions of the limbic system. Some of the mental problems of the inmates are schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Sexual offenders with this disorder are most likely to commit the same crime again (Pallone & Voelbel, 2011).

The Sex Offender Register is the common appearance for the records held by the police rising from the statutory requirement that sex offenders should notify the police of their address details and change of conditions. The register is providing greater knowledge of the whereabouts of such offenders in the interests of public protection (Stone, 2008). The Sex Offenders Act of 1997 provides that offenders convicted of cautioned, warned or reprimanded for a relevant offence are subject to notification requirements commonly known as registration requirements in respect of specified personal details, recorded and retained by the police.

Participants will include all male child molesters or sex offenders held in the Duval County Jail in Jacksonville, FL. Participants will have to be male, 18 years of age or older, and method of offending along with the nature of victim selection is adequately defined as belonging to one of the following categories: child molesters, female victims: men who molested at most two female children in a situational context and child molesters, male victims: men who molested at most one male child.

Hello, I am writing this letter regarding the sex offender database as well as possible checkups to both high and low risk sex offenders. I believe the sex offender's database should be open to the public under certain circumstances. This issue is a concern to our community in view of the fact that a charged sex offender could be living in any neighbourhood without society's knowledge. I would like to address the issue that without the public being able to access this information, society could be unaware of a possible threat/danger to them.

Research has shown that sex offenders are perceived by society as remorseless, heartless, dangerous, monsters (Blanchard, 1995; Marshall 1996) with the only considered punishment being to, “lock em up and throw away the key” (Scheela, 2001 p.749).

The constituent left us a voice message asking to direct her to the right place or to give her a phone number where she can ask about a inmate who is being released from jail and must now register as a sex offender and that was not in the original court case.

As many would imagine, juveniles are often hesitant to fully admit the extent of their abuse or the actual number of victims they have created. Juvenile sex offenders who are in denial about their offenses do not typically engage in and comply with treatment (Hunter & Figueredo, 2000; Maletzky, 1991). The first step of treatment is to get the offenders to take full accountability for the actions that brought them to treatment in the first place. This process can take several months. In order to move on in most treatment programs the juveniles must take and successfully pass a full sex history polygraph. Failure to do so can result in removal from program and placement in a higher level of care and noncompliance with a court order.

There is a growing problem with crime in the United States, but the one that is unique in its own way is sexual assault and the varieties of sex offenders that engage in those activities. A sex offender is anyone who commits a crime that involves any sexual act. Statistical data like risk assessment can help minimize and prevent some crimes that involve a sex offender. Risk assessment is defined as the probable threat that includes an action that involves a specific activity. In this case, the risk assessment would define sex offenders and the probable statistics that a sex offender would commit another sexual offense. Risk assessments formed to counter the various crimes that are disconcerting in the United States. Statistical data can also prove the growing problem that sex offenders pose to the country. Treatments and preventions have evolved to combat the sex offenders of our time since the offenders are constantly changing with the environment and technology around us. Sexual assaults can affect anyone at any time no matter what gender, race, or disability a person has. There are numerous classifications for sex offenders and different guidelines to what classifies that specific offender in that category.

The Dangerous sexual offender was a new amendment made to the criminal code enacted in 1960-1961 replacing the older criminal sexual psychopath. The new definition of the dangerous sexual had three components first is that a “person by his conduct in any sexual matter has shown failure to control his sexual impulses [second is] who is likely to cause injury pain or other evil to any person through failure in the future to control his sexual impulses or [third] is likely to commit further sexual offence (Klippert v. Queen, 1967, p. 833). The biggest difference between the earlier criminal sexual psychopath and the newer dangerous sexual offender was the or clause which allowed for the third alternative. This third alternative according to Kinsman

Sex offender registration in the United States began with the Jacob Wetterling Crimes against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, passed by Congress in 1994. Since then, every states has indorsed some practice of sex offender registry and public reporting system. At present, researchers have determined that “Sex Laws are undeserved and unproductive”. If the social order wants to keep their children safe from real sex offenders, we need to do away with our existing sex offender registries and absolutely rethink the way we outline and punish sexual offences in this country. Currently, a substantial proportion of those people listed in sex offender registries pose almost no threat to children, making it challenging for us to know who really does pose a threat to our children and what we should do about them. As a nation, we have foolishly concluded that all sex crimes are the same. While sex offender registry laws vary from state to state. The problem is simple because the law says that two teens caught engaging in consensual oral sex in high school belong on the same list as a child rapist. This notion is ridiculous. This concept leaves

In the state of Florida a sexual offender is a person who has been convicted of one or more of the following offenses listed: sexual misconduct prohibited, sexual battery, human trafficking, luring or the enticing of a child(minor) defendant is not the parent, sexual performance by a child, transmission of child pornography through the use of an electronic device or equipment, etc. (2) Has recently completed parole or is currently on parole, probation, or are incarcerated for an offense that qualifies as a sex offense (3) Has established or maintains either a permanent, temporary, or transient residence in Florida or they have been convicted of an offense in another jurisdiction

The proper management and treatment of adult and juvenile sex offender play a crucial role in the protection of the general public. In order to properly manage and treat sex offenders the: who, what, where, why and how of the sexual offender and the sexual offense committed. When issuing management and treatment the nature of the crime comes into great thought of whether it was rape, public exposure, sodomy, possession of child pornography, etc. All of these crimes all have different punishments that follow which would also mean the management and treatment of the sex offender would be different as well. When attempting to come up with the best management and treatment method of these sex offenders the individuals assigning

My publication efforts have not just been limited to Dr. Tewksbury, but have expanded to other professors. I have continued to focus on victimization with Dr. George Higgins from the University of Louisville with a manuscript currently under review regarding familial identity theft. I have also maintained my working relationship with Dr. Rabe-Hemp, in which my thesis that examined the financial impact caused by registered sex offenders on sold homes is currently under review. With Dr. Tewksbury as my dissertation chair, I wish to expand my thesis to focus on a number of U.S. counties, and primarily address the limitations with my dissertation.