Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” argues that indifference is evil and shouldn’t be allowed to continue if we rise to have a brighter future of connectivity and compassion. He develops his claim by illustrating and defining different aspects of indifference and its affect upon people as a whole, then he goes into a real event that shows the destructive power of such a lack of compassion or emotion for other human beings which is the death of millions, then he questions the audience about different subjects to make them think harder upon the subject presented to them, and finally offers a sad emotional appeal to completely drive home the emotional appeal behind the kids, those who pay for the fights …show more content…
He establishes a critical tone for those who don’t see indifference as much of a problem or at least a problem that concerns them. Indifference is an evil poison that must be fought to bring about a more compassionate era in the new millennium. The text clearly shows how indifference is evil and supplies us with one major event to truly set this idea in; overall the speech is full of deeper meaning and astonishing amounts of structure in each sentence that can be read. Dripping with undertones of what he truly believes indifference is and connecting to not only our emotions but also our logic as well as setting up his credibility to talk about such a topic by being a Holocaust survivor. Then later attacking the subject by offering us questions, overwhelming sentences that are emotionally heavy, and the truth behind what the manifestation of most critical connotation of the word indifference can lead to. The deaths of so many, as we turn away from the violence and don’t care as long as it isn’t affecting us in the immediate time. In the beginning we are already in the presence of much style, structure, and tone. We get to listen to a calm and thorough voice as he talks about his past …show more content…
which makes it easier not to see them as humans but as just a thought that disappears when they think about it. Out of sight out of mind is their motto as millions perish a fate so inhumane that they become living shells of their past selves. Not caring to eat, sleep, bathe or even move as their consciences is ultimately broken by their harsh treatment. The speech expresses this so strongly that it makes anyone feel guilty for the tragedy that happened in Auschwitz throughout the rule of Nazi Germany. Revealing strongly the stance of Wiesel himself upon the matter and expressing what he wants us to get from such tragedies. That indifference is like a tumor that must be removed immediately before it becomes cancer and shrouds our minds to the pain, suffering, and overall torture of others. This is supported through the description of Auschwitz along with the people who were there, how even the emotion of hatred or anger is better than being indifferent because it shows that an individual cares enough to actually be afflicted by such emotions. Along with the description of how emotions such as anger elicit a response from those who are feeling it while people who are
Writer, Elie Wiesel in his metaphorical speech “The perils of Indifference” argues that the future will never know the agony of the Holocaust and they will never understand the tragedy of the horrific terror in Germany. Wiesel wants people to not let this happen but at the time many modern genocides that are occurring and people shouldn’t be focused on just the Holocaust, they should focus on making this world a better place; moreover, Wiesel expresses his thoughts about all the genocides that has happen throughout the years. He develops his message through in an horrifying event that took place 54 years ago the day “ The perils of Indifference” was published. Wiesel illustrates the indifferences of good vs evil. He develops this message
Wiesel does a wonderful job with his use of pathos throughout the speech by making the audience reflect on his words and creates a strong emotional reaction for what is being said. From being a survivor of the Holocaust, one of the darkest parts of history as well as the most shallow times for humanity. Immediate sympathy is drawn from the audience. When he states that himself endured the horrible conditions these people had to live in. He then explains to us that the people there, “No longer felt hunger, pain, thirst. They feared nothing. They felt nothing. They were dead and did not know it.” With saying this it brings forth feelings of guilt, one of the most negative emotions to accumulate a reaction towards these events. Also numerous people throughout the world long for world peace and to hear the inhumane acts that was once acted upon an innocent man, makes their stomach's sink. Wiesel defines its derivation, as “no difference” and uses numerous comparisons on what may cause indifference, as a “strange and unnatural state in which the lines blur.” Like good and evil, dark and light. Wiesel continues to attract the audience emotionally by stating this he is aware of how tempting it may be to be indifferent and that at times it can be easier to avoid
When Elie Wiesel said that indefference is perilous, because he meant that it’s bad to not to care about something that is serious and, is very dangerous. He states very clearly is his speech that “ indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten”(paragraph 9). This means, that indifference is always the enemys favorite thing because, if no one cares then the enemy of the situation will always get away with what he is doing and, no one will try to stop him and that it makes the victim of the enemy forgotten becuase no one cares about there pain or suffering. He goes on to explain that, “Rooted in our tradition, some of us felt that to be abandoned by humanity then was not the ultimate”(paragraph 7). They felt abandoned by other humans, because people showed no care about what was
In any powerful speech, the speaker communicates and relates directly to his or her audience. Elie Wiesel does a superb job of doing this in his Perils of Indifference speech, given in April 1999. His use of pathos
He did this with the main point of his speech centering on how dangerous indifference can be to humankind.
Elie Wiesel has given the listener a wonderful opportunity to feel the intense movement of his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. His speech is centered around the need for vigilance in the face of evil. Throughout this speech, with which he moved so many, he shared his experience with being sent to Buchenwald, a concentration camp, the treacherous conditions in which they were living, and the way that indifference has separated human beings. He explained, that through anger and hatred a great poem or symphony can be written, because “One does something special for the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses.” (Wiesel, 1999/16, p. 78). The three strategies that will be explored throughout this analysis are ethos, logos, and pathos.
Elie Wiesel questions and asks that even though people see photos, are aware and feel empathy for what is what is occurring around the world, why don’t they just do something? “Does it mean that we have learned from the past? Does it mean that society has changed? Has the human being become less indifferent and more human? Have we really learned from our experiences” (Perils of Indifference)? Though that the holocaust has supposedly taught the world the responsibility of prevent, have we all really learned that? He also wanted to convey that indifference is worse than any other feeling such as hate. “Yet, for the person who is indifferent, his or her neighbor are of no consequence. And, therefore, their lives are meaningless. Their hidden or even visible anguish is of no interest. Indifference reduces the other to an abstraction” (Perils of Indifference). Indifference is when solicitude is missing which indicates that there is a lack of awareness. Elie believes indifference is worse than hate because it implies that someone’s suffering isn’t worth rumination and consideration. The inhumanity that was put upon the Jews could have been stopped if people cared enough to take action against the Germans. Both messages are relevant and matter because they
“The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel, explains the true and utter horror of indifference. There is a clear emphasis on the morality exhibited in the act as well as the disappointment in the US government’s ability to respond to such a horrible act. It is obvious that Wiesel establishes tones of morality, condescendingness, and caution through diction, imagery, as well as syntax used in the speech. Although Wiesel describes how indifference has a massive effect on the victims even though by the very nature, bystanders do nothing. Indifference itself shows lack of regard for those in need and that can be perceived as morally lacking, which Wiesel condemns in the highest degree.
“He was finally free, but there was no joy in his heart. He thought there never would be again”. This quote stated by Elie Wiesel from his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, refers to the day Elie Wiesel got liberated from the Holocaust when he was young. The Holocaust was just one of the many horrific tragedies that occurred during that century. In hopes of changing the future for the better, Wiesel decides to deliver a speech about helping the victims of injustice. He gives this speech intended for the President, Mrs. Clinton, members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke, Excellencies, and friends hoping that they will make positive changes for the future. By using rhetorical strategies such as anaphora, rhetorical questions, and ethos, Wiesel tries to help the victims of injustice and prevent future tragedies from happening.
“Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end.” (American Rhetoric). This is a sentiment that Elie Wiesel pushes throughout his speech, The Perils of Indifference. Elie Wiesel was a Romanian born, Jewish writer, and was a survivor of the holocaust (Berger). In his speech, The Perils of Indifference, he discusses how indifference has hurt him, and everyone throughout the world. In this speech Wiesel uses appeals to pathos to make his argument effective. Examples are scattered across the speech to make it more appealing, and provide real world context for what he is arguing about. The last of the rhetorical choices the speaker makes is definition, in this speech Wiesel defines indifference, and uses this definition to prove why indifference hurts people. In Elie Wiesel’s speech, The Perils of Indifference, he argues that indifference hurts people, and his argument is effective by using various rhetorical choices.
Wiesel is effective with his speech by connecting exaggeration within his revelation. He questions the guilt and responsibility for past massacres, pointing specifically at the Nazi’s while using historical facts, such as bloodbaths in Cambodia, Algeria, India, and Pakistan to include incidents on a larger level such as Auschwitz to provide people with a better idea (Engelhardt, 2002). He is effective in putting together the law and society’s need for future actions against indifference by stating, “In the place I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killer, the victims, and the bystanders” 7.(Wiesel 223).
Noble peace prize winner, Elie Wiesel delivered a powerful speech on April 12, 1999. The Perils of Indifference plays a crucial role in the way people envisioned the Holocaust. Wiesel serves as an evidence of the mass murder at the Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camps. To convey what he experienced during World War II, Wiesel delivered The Perils of Indifference at the Millennium Evening in Wahington DC. To make his speech effective, Wiesel uses appeals and rhetorical devices such as Pathos, and repetition. He also uses anecdotes and diction to get the attention of his audience.
Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, in the speech “Perils of Indifference”, calls out the American government for being indifferent in an important time in world history. He claims that indifference is a very horrible thing and bad things have come from. He supports his claim by first explaining his childhood, then he goes on to talk about what it means to him, next explains the power it can have and finally explains the consequences that can come from it. His purpose is to educate his audience about indifference in hope of preventing indifference to continue in the future generations in order to accomplish his purpose for the speech. He establishes a calm tone for his audience.
In the world during the time of the Holocaust, there was indifference towards the suffering of millions of Jews. When individuals reflect about the Holocaust, the majority of the time the responsibility of the terrible events is placed upon the perpetrators. However, bystanders and witnesses indirectly affected the victims of the Holocaust as well. The silence of these people played one of the largest roles in the Holocaust, they influenced it by avoiding any type of involvement and by becoming blinded towards the suffering of others. In his Academy Award acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel says, “the opposite of love is not hate, it’s indifference”. This exert from his speech reveals the importance
Jewish writer and political activist, Eliezer Wiesel in his lugubrious and morose speech, “The perils of Indifference”, claims that we should avoid indifference and informs us of the dangers. He develops his claim by describing why indifference is not impactful to humanity and the inhumanity of it. In addition, Wiesel states “Indifference, then, not only a sin, it is a punishment.” which is significant to society because not being concerned about the problems in the world can lead to great consequences. Furthermore, the author uses negative connotation such as “rage,” “dark,” “sin,” and “hatred,” to describe the pains in society. Wiesel’s purpose is to inform readers that “indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred” in