Nonviolent Drug Crimes
Over the past few years the merit of placing criminals who have committed a nonviolent crime in jail has been heavily contested. Upon further research, I found a majority of people believe that these offenders do deserve punishment, but not to the extent of jail time. The reasoning of this greatly varies, but two main arguments against their incarceration are the high cost of keeping a man in jail, and the high incarceration rate already in place. Thus, to resolve the problem of an astronomical mass incarceration rate, nonviolent drug criminals should warrant little to no jail time.
A reason why I believe nonviolent drug crimes should get lesser sentences or no jail time is because of the mass incarceration rate in
…show more content…
Isolating non violent people from society is not solving any problems, it is just temporarily ignoring the problem. When these people get out of prison, with a record, nobody wants to hire them and they don’t have anything better to do then to do drugs. In the article “Addiction: The View From Rat Park,” by Professor of Psychology Bruce Alexander does an addiction experiment on rats. First, he placed a lone rat in a cage with regular water and water laced with cocaine or heroin. Almost always the rat would become addicted to the drugged water and eventually overdose and die. But then he placed many rates with colorful balls and tunnels and such. He also gave these rats drugged water and regular water, and the rats barely touched the drugged water. The key is connections and a good environment, not isolation. So, by placing addicts in prison, they will not learn better habits and better ways of life from their pals behind bars. People all over the world-rich and poor alike- are being torn from their family ties. More and more people are spending more and more time alone, therefore they are becoming more and more prone to using some type of drug. we should prepare them for a second
More than two decades of experience in the United States have proven that the substantial costs of incarcerating drug offenders would be better used "to fund drug treatment and harm reduction programs, alternatives to incarceration, employment opportunities and human services." U.S. Criminal Lawyers Warn Against Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Schemes. (2010, August 16). Targeted News Service, page 1. Retrieved March 8, 2011, from Research Library. (Document ID: 2112542531
The United States has the world's highest incarceration rate. With five percent of the world's population, our country houses nearly twenty-five percent of the world's reported prisoners. Currently there are approximately two million people in American prisons or jails. Since 1984 the prison population for drug offenders has risen from ten percent to now over thirty percent of the total prison population. Federal prisons were estimated to hold 179,204 sentenced inmates in 2007; 95,446 for drug offenses. State prisons held a total of 1,296,700 inmates in 2005; 253,300 for drug offenses. Sixty percent of the drug offenders in prisons are nonviolent and were purely in prison because of drug offenses (Drug War Facts). The question then arises,
There has been debate over whether non-violent drug offenders belong in prison. Some believe all drug offenders should be put in prison, others believe that it depends on circumstances, and, still others believe only violent drug offenders should be incarcerated. Overcrowding is one point of contention. It seems as though the slightest infraction can land a person in prison. Violence is rampant, whether inmate versus inmate or inmate versus guard. Rehabilitation or education is practically non-existent, unless an inmate teaching another inmate how to commit the ‘perfect’ crime is counted. Evidence shows being in prison does little to rehabilitate an inmate. Clearly, the system does not work.
The United States’ prison population is currently number one in the world. As a nation that proclaims freedom for citizens, the United States houses more than one million more persons than Russian and almost one million more persons than China. Currently, the United States makes up five percent of the world’s population and imprisons twenty-five percent of the world’s inmate population. Drug offenders who committed no act of violence make up a large portion of the inmates in the United States. County, State, and Federal prisons are so over populated that the private sector has opened up corporate facilities to house convicted persons. The cost each year to hold a person rises, placing larger financial demands on the judicial system. The Judicial System of the United States should reevaluate the sentencing guidelines for non-violent drug offenders to alleviate the high number of people in the prison system.
The War on Drugs is one cause for the mass incarceration that has become apparent within the United States. This refers to a drastic amount of people being imprisoned for mainly non-violent crime (“Mass Incarceration” 2016). In addition to people who are not an immediate threat to society being locked up for a substantial duration of time, the economic consequences are costing states and taxpayers millions of dollars. Specifically, every one in five people incarcerated is in prison due to some
Tougher sentencing is not likely to reduce illegal drug use or serious crime associated with drugs (Alexander, 2010; Mauer, 2009; Whitford & Yates, 2009). Despite that, politicians and law enforcement personnel continue to advocate for stronger sentences for those who take or sell drugs of any kind. The jails and prisons across the United States are filling up with drug offenders, and some believe that there are better uses for those jail cells and that there are many crimes that are more severe and significant. These are the crimes that should be provided with tougher sentencing guidelines, but yet illegal drug use is still a serious crime and should not go unpunished. What should be done, and how should changes be made? Those are tough questions that have to be explored and that do not have any easy answers for those who make the laws and those who enforce them. Drug incarceration has been on the rise, with mixed results. According to King (2008), "overall, between 1980 and 2003, the number of drug offenders in prison or jail increased by 1100% from 41,100 in 1980 to 493,800 in 2003, with a remarkable rise in arrests concentrated in African American communities."
The mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug crimes should be abolished. Treatment and rehabilitation efforts
Laws like three strikes, mandatory minimum sentencing, powder and crack cocaine disparities, and others, must be eradicated. The prisons are overfilled with non-violent, victimless offenders living environments that are overcrowded, in poor condition, and exploitive of prisoners’ lack of basic rights. This is neither conducive to the betterment of prisoners, nor the improvement of their life trajectories once they leave. Additionally, most drug laws produce racially disparate outcomes, furthering stereotypes and the inherent criminalization of men of color. In the long run, America must move toward alternative sentencing programs for low-level and non-violent offenders that issue penalties that are actually proportionate with real public safety
The United States is five percent of the world’s population and has twenty five percent of the world’s people incarcerated. This is the highest rate of incarceration in the world. Mass incarceration has been a problem in this country for decades. The war on drugs has increased the odds of incarceration and the length of sentences for non-violent offenders. Ninety five percent of prisoners have plead guilty and one out of five are serving sentences for drug related charges (REF).
Have you heard the phrase "prisons are over populated!"? Statistics show 21.2% of low level drug offenders, that are incarcerated, do not have any current or prior violence in their records, no involvement in sophisticated criminal activity and no prior commitment. (USDOJ) Could this be the problem of prisons being over populated? There are many factors that need to be considered when looking for other possible methods of dealing with non-violent drug offenders. Some lawmakers believe the only way to deal with these offenders is to lock them up for long periods of time, while other feel the solution lies within treatment facilities and expanded social programs. With both sides having valid points we must then evaluate what is the
When we talk about the United States justice system and how it affects its prisoners, it is important to consider all of the different factors. One factor would be saying that drug crimes are victimless. Some say that the only victims in drug crimes are the drug users themselves. A second factor is the mandatory minimum sentences, meaning that no matter how minimal the crime there is a minimal sentence everybody has to go through. A third factor to consider is reforming prisons. In many countries when their justice system puts someone in jail they focus on getting them help and helping end their addictions, not just punishing them for their crime. I argue that the US justice system should continue to fight the war on drugs because drug crimes are not victimless and it sends the wrong message to children.
First and foremost, in order to produce and educated opinion on the possibility of the over-incarceration of drug-offenders, we must first analyze the laws that land individuals in prison. In the early and mid-1970s the crime rate was skyrocketing, people were being murdered, and mothers were neglecting their children in order indulge in drugs. The primary culprit for the erratic behavior was crack-cocaine. The drug swept the streets as a more affordable substitute for powered cocaine that could be smoked instead of injected; the only difference between the two was the addition of baking soda, water, and heat from a stove or microwave. The ingenious combination of cocaine and household chemicals gave birth to a narcotic that the government
Those incarcerated today are not given the chance to change their behavior patterns, especially when it is in regard to drug addiction. The criminal justice system in general does not consider drug abuse as anything but a crime and does not think about treating the disease of addiction in order to reduce or eliminate the crimes that come as a
Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. This issue embraces two positions: drugs should not be legalized and drugs should be legalized. These two positions contain an array of angles that supports each issue. This brief of the issues enables one to consider the strengths and weakness of each argument, become aware of the grounds of disagreement and agreement and ultimately form an opinion based upon the positions stated within the articles. In the article “Against the Legalization of Drugs”, by James Q. Wilson, the current status of drugs is supported. Wilson believes if a drug such as heroin were legalized there would be no financial or medical reason to avoid heroin usage;
Drugs are a huge problem in the US there are hundreds of people currently addicted to drugs in some states alone and we are trying to solve this problem and whenever a drug addict is caught they are usually sent to prison, tons of people sent to prison when it's not even the best option. Currently, people are completely unaware that rehab is a much better option than prison for drug offenders because it is both economically superior and helps addicts reintegrate into society.