In the eastern front of U.S. Civil War there were two men who stood above the rest. Robert E. Lee was the commanding general of the Army of Northern Virginia. Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson commanded the Army of the Shenandoah. The military genius of these two men was far beyond that of any Union or Confederate officer in the east. History tells us that Robert E. Lee was one of the greatest commanding officers in history. History only tells us that Jackson was brave and stood like a stonewall at the First Battle of Manassas Junction, but was Jackson as good a commander as Lee? While they had their similarities these two men were very different in the ways they commanded their armies, and the ways they saw could end the war in victory …show more content…
Several times during the course of the war, Jackson presented this plan to Lee and Davis, but each time the letter came back saying he was to defend Richmond. Lee's plan was once again one for glory, seeming to know that men would die, he chose to thrust himself into the spotlight and attack the Union on their own soil. Jackson's plan was one of strategy, he wanted to force the opponents hand and make them give in. Comparing these two men, we find that their differences strongly outweigh their similarities. Lee was destined for glory, seeming to only want glory and honor that comes in meeting your enemy face to face. Lee would send troops into battle at the strongest point. Lee was not a bad commander, he had many great victories and was very bold and daring, but he was not the great commander the history books make him. Jackson was a peaceful man, and he would often choose a battle plan that involved little to no fighting. Before he was killed at Chancellorsville while scouting enemy lines, he was well respected among his men. Who was the better commander? History would say Robert E. Lee was, but logic and reason would show us that Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson had the ability and sense to lead his troops more
Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee met on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House in Virginia. Both of these men were bringing a stop to the Civil War. The way Grant and Lee led their army were different from each other. Lee was a nobleman who fought hard for his Confederate men. Lee became a symbol for which his men were willing to die for. On the other hand, Grant grew up the hard way through the toughness beyond the mountains. Catton says “ These frontier men were the precise opposites of the tidewater aristocrats”. Grant and Lee represented two different sides of the so called American life. Though having different personalities and beliefs, both Grant and Lee are actually quite similar. They are tremendous fighters who only want one thing--to
Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee are two of the most effective military leaders in American history. These men have become symbolic of the two nations at conflict during the Civil War. Both had very different backgrounds and personalities that caused them to differ in their military leadership and accomplishments. Even though General Lee would surrender his army to General Grant, Lee throughout the course of the war proved himself to be a better military leader.
No matter how much something can differ some characteristics are shared. As strange as it sounds it’s very true, both Grant and Lee are two different yet similar people. As these two fights for what they believe in, though their beliefs are different they share some qualities. Ulysses S. Grant wanted the nation to expand and look forward towards the future. Robert E. Lee thought that an old aristocratic way of life was the better choice and that it can survive and dominant in American life.
If Andrew Jackson and Thomas Jefferson faced off, many would argue over which president was better leader and who was more effective. Jackson and Jefferson have more differences among them then they have alike, but they both stood in their beliefs and completed major events that helped with the writings of America’s history. If Jefferson or Jackson had an idea in mind that needed to be completed, they were very effective to get that job done in an efficient time. Both presidents held professions before office and out of the eight years both presidents held in office, many acts were created which aided both men to accomplish the ideas they had. Jackson’s daily life and attitude was considerably different compared to Jefferson but that didn 't stop him from getting his job done. Over all Jefferson was the better president and was more efficient thought his works.
Stonewall Jackson, a general for the Confederate Army died in 1863 due to complications from a gunshot wound (“Thomas”). Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson was a general for the Confederate Army during the Civil War. Jackson was most commonly known for his strategy and his men who were very skilled. Despite all of this Jackson was a brilliant tactician and a master at commanding his troops, which is why he is regarded as one of the best generals of the Civil War.
Famed Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson’s legacy is hardly easy to define. His is most remembered for cunning speed and brutality in battle and many consider him without equal. The same strategies Jackson used in the Shenandoah Valley campaign were scrutinized by both Rommel and Patton for inspiration in WWII. Jackson’s personal discipline carried over into his command. Although his men were often barefoot and near starvation, he pushed them forward into battle, not wishing to sacrifice the element of surprise. Many of his battles were actually waged on Sundays which contradicts Jackson’s steadfast devotion to Christianity that many attribute to fanaticism.
LTG Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson graduated from West Point in 1846 and saw battle in the Mexican-American War. Jackson commanded the Second Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia and took his wing into the Battle of Antietam on 17 September 1862.
Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson is known for standing like a stonewall against the enemy in the First Battle of Bull Run. He became a very important person in the South because he was such a good commander. He didn’t let his past define who he was. Even though he was kicked out of his own home, because his step-father didn’t like him, he still went to school and graduated from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York. Right after school, he went into the military, where he made a very big difference in the war (Stonewall Jackson, 2016).
In the end of the Civil War. Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant were considered as heroes. The two generals would earn a great reputation and will go down as one of the best generals for the years to come. These two changed, todays American History and how we can know better understand how the war actually came about. We know that these two made life decisions out on the battle field. We know that the both of them gave everything they had for their homeland. Though we know that their choices would represent each other.
Robert E. Lee was a confederate commander in the civil war. Before the civil war, Lincoln offered Lee command for the federal forces, due to his great military achievements, but he declined as he joined new rank in the confederate states. John Pope was a commander for the Union in the civil war. They have both similarities and differences, and famously clash in the second Bull Run Battle.
By the end of the Civil War, much of the country thought of General Robert E. Lee and General Ulysses S. Grant as personal heroes. Despite the outcome of the war, both the Union and the Confederates looked towards their leader with admiration. Both men were viewed as spectacular fighters, who were smart and strategic during the war. However, despite similarities between the two Civil War generals their differences in background experiences, personality traits, and personal underlying aspirations made them not only opposites of each other but the perfect champion for the people they were chosen to lead.
In April 12 ,1861 the American civil war had been declared, there were two major generals Grant and Lee. Both Grant and Lee were very honest and good men who fought for the protection of their people. As I found on and , Grant fought for the Union because he didnt like slavery or succession, Lee fouoght for the Confederacy but disliked slavery and succession but loved Virginia so much he didnt want to fight against it. The people of Virginia were like family to him, he was well respected and not mistreated there was nothing in the world that would make him think about changing over to the Union. Although Grant won the war I found Lee to be far more superior because of his military background, strategies, leadership skills.
“Jackson quickly proved his bravery and resilience on the field, serving with distinction under General Winfield Scott. Jackson participated in the Siege of Veracruz and the battles of Contreras, Chapultepec, and Mexico City.” During this war with Mexico, Jackson met Robert E. Lee. By the time the war5 ended, Jackson was declared a hero and was promoted to the rank of Brevet Major (biography.com). Jackson’s focus and strict resolve were no match for his post commander who seemed to think it permissible to “let down” after the war ended. Being disillusioned with this peacetime army, Jackson decides to retire and return to civilian life (Dickson, 124). Jackson was offered a position as a professor at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia. It was there that he served as professor of “natural and experimental philosophy as well as of artillery tactics.” “As a professor, Jackson’s cold demeanor and strange quirks made him unpopular among his students.” Though he had many “quirks” and oddities which made the students feel he was a bit strange, his effectiveness as a professor of artillery tactics was insurmountable
Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson once said, “You may be whatever you resolve to be,” (Biography.com Editors). Many of the greatest men throughout history, including Stonewall Jackson, came from small beginnings, yet with perseverance, achieved their wildest dreams. Furthermore, many of these men were inspirational figures to others during his or her time; alike how Stonewall Jackson was idolized by many southerners due to being born with a family facing an uphill battle against death and poverty, but overpowered all odds and became a triumphant military general. However, Jackson was not only a successful general but also taught a variety of sciences and artillery tactics at VMI and
During the times of Civil War, there were many Commanding Generals that came along. But two stand out amongst all, Ulysses S. Grant of United States of America and Robert E. Lee of Confederate States of America. Both men had formally fought, not along side of each other, in the Mexican-American War. At one point Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant worked together in the Mexican-American War. They both gained a war time experience, Grant as a quartermaster and Lee as an engineer who positioned troops and artillery during their participation in the Scott’s march from the coastal town of Vera Cruz to Mexico City. Both men were vastly different with different styles and background who not only won the affection of their men but respect of