MEMORANDUM Statement of Facts On January 1, 2006, Sooner or Later Inc. granted 1,000 “at-the-money: employee stock options which will vest only if cumulative revenue over the following three-year reporting period is greater than $10 million and the employees are still employed by Sooner or Later Inc. They adopted ASC 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation in 2005. 1. The grant-date fair value of each award is $9. With the revenue target factored into the fair value assessment the grant-date fair value is $6. 2. Management believes it is probable the company will achieve cumulative revenue in excess of $10 million. 3. The requisites to vest were fulfilled. Revenue of $2 million, $5 million and $4 million was collected in …show more content…
Market conditions that affect an award’s fair value (including exercisability) are included in the estimate of grant-date fair value (see paragraph 718-10-30-15). Performance or service conditions that only affect vesting are excluded from the estimate of grant-date fair value, but all other performance or service conditions that affect an award’s fair value are included in the estimate of grant-date fair value (see that same paragraph).” c. Due to the inclusion of the pertinent factors phrase and the fact that market conditions affect an award’s fair value, the $6 grant-date fair value, with the revenue target factored in, is a more precise value. 2. Sooner or Later Inc. should recognize compensation cost over the three year reporting period. d. ASC 710-10-25-9 addresses the recognition of deferred compensation arrangements. It states: “To the extent the terms of a contract attribute all or a portion of the expected future benefits to a period of service greater than one year, the cost of those benefits shall be accrued over that period of the employee’s service in a systematic and rational manner.” The compensation costs associated with the stock options should be allocated over the three-year reporting period. e. ASC 718-10-25-2 states that, “an entity shall recognize the services received in a share-based payment transaction with an employee as services are received.” As the
statements are for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2013.) The problem contains three major
* b. Further allocation of amounts allocated to repurchased shares to various components of stockholder equity upon formal or constructive retirement.
Compensation systems can take on many forms, all of which have positives and negatives related to it. However, certain components are noted to be determinants of solid compensation plans. One agreement of a solid compensation system is the use of incentives. “Clearly a successful companies set objectives that will provide incentives to increase profitability” (Needles & Powers, 2011). Incentive bonuses should be measures that the company finds important to long-term growth. According to Needles & Powers (2011) the most successful companies long term focused on profitability measures. For large for-profit firms, compensation programs should offer stock options. The interweaving between the market value of a company’s stock and company’s performance both motivate and increase compensation to employees As the market value of the stock goes up, the difference between the option price and the market price grows, which increases the amount of compensation” (Needles & Powers, 2011). Conclusively, a compensation plan should serve all stakeholders, be simple, group employees properly, reflect company culture and values, and be flexible (Davis & Hardy, 1999; The Basics of a Compensation Program).
1. For the year-end December 31, 2007, financial statements, what amount should M record as a liability?
3. How, if at all, is the acquisition of Hamlet recognized or disclosed in the financial statements?
This result occurs because the tax law considers this to be deferred compensation that is ineligible for recurring item exception, unless it is paid by March 15 of the year following the accrual (see Section 404 (a)(5) and (6).
(iv) Detailed computation of the grant, allowances and income, before and after implementation of the agency decision or action.
3.) What effect, if any, would HVC’s willingness to commit an additional $100,000 during the first year have on the recommended percentage of each project that HVC should fund?
Response: After the evaluation process has taken place a pay increase will be effective for the following fiscal year. Based on the performance measures the pay increase will be determined by the employee’s ability to accomplish the set goal from the organizational heads. Bonus are administered at the end of the calendar year and are based on the overall successes of the organization.
Requests for donation from alumni, patrons, grant makers, and foundation are extremely imperative. Commitment to the organization’s grant proposal includes resources or services that could be offered from the organization. This type of commitment displays wiliness and cooperation that concerns the dedication to the purpose or mission that is presented by the organization. Comprehensive programs evaluation that consist of monthly or quarterly reports, budget oversight, and internal auditing apparently are necessary to successfully gain knowledge the productivity of the organization. The bases of a compelling case are the organization’s ability to demonstrate that it’s purpose coincides with parameters described within the grant proposal. Competition is not to be ignore there are other agencies, institutions, nonprofits and local public entities that are striving for funding, therefore initiating a thorough proposal is
The second compensation package was not well designed nor did it help define what the corporate strategy would be. For a second time the compensation package focused on maximizing shareholder’s wealth and didn’t take into consideration the stakeholder’s position at all. Dunlap’s package was deeply weighted in company options ($3.75M). In fact it was weighted heavier than before. The stock grants were
Solutions to Valuation Questions 1. Assume you expect a company’s net income to remain stable at $1,100 for all future years, and you expect all earnings to be distributed to stockholders at the end of each year, so that common equity also remains stable for all future years (assumes clean surplus). Also, assume the company’s β = 1.5, the market risk premium is 4% and the 20-30 year yield on risk free treasury bonds is 5%. Finally, assume the company has 1,000 shares of common stock outstanding. a. Use the CAPM to estimate the company’s equity cost of capital. • re = RF + β * (RM – RF) = 0.05 + 1.5 * 0.04 = 11% b. Compute the expected net distributions to stockholders for each future year. • D = NI – ΔCE = $1,100 – 0 = $1,100 c. Use the
Murray Compensation, Inc. (Murray), an SEC registrant that provides payroll processing and benefit administration services to other companies, granted 100,000 “at-the-money” employee share options on January 1, 2006. The awards have a grant-date fair value of $6, vest at the end of the third year of service (cliff-vesting), and have an exercise price of $21.
Harris Enterprise is announcing that employee stock purchases will be extended to current full time employees starting July 2, 2015. You may purchase these exclusive benefits at competitive market value which will includes a specialized employee discount. Employee stock options have been created as a compensation plans benefitting companies, stockholders, and employees. There are a few important pieces of information all employees should know:
12 months of the reporting date are measured at their nominal amounts based on remuneration rates which are expected to be paid when the liability is settled. All other employee benefits or liabilities are measured at the present value of the estimated future cash outflows to be made in respect of services provided by the employees up to the reporting date.