The primary source is Federalist paper No. 10, which is a the first of James Madison’s contributions to the series of essays known as the Federalist Papers. This essay is a highly regarded paper among the collection. The Federalist No. 10 is merely rhetoric used to rationalize the benefits of a new system of government, explain how the new union will be constructed and most crucial to the essay, sway public opinion to support the ratification of the new constitution. This particular primary source is imperative to understanding the complexity of the United States government at the time of its birth as well as now. Madison makes an argument that the expansion of the federal government is necessary to protect liberty against the excess of democracy. The document reveals the advantages of a Republic and serves as an explanation as to why the U.S. espouses a Republican form of government and the Constitution. Madison starts perhaps the most prominent of the Federalist papers by stating that one of the most effective arguments in favor of the Constitution is the fact that it forms a …show more content…
As long as there is liberty, different opinions and factions will form. Madison simply wishes to establish a system in which the detrimental effects of factions on the whole government are reduced and kept in check. He argues that a pure democracy cannot mitigate the threats of factions and that only a republic can. He believes that a system of government that allow every citizen to vote directly for laws is dangerous as common people's decisions are affected by their self-interest, instead he advocates a different form of government in which citizens elect a small body of representatives who then vote for laws. Madison’s trust in a republic is fueled and bolstered by his lack of confidence in the people’s capacity to make well-informed
In Federalist 10 by James Madison, he addresses key issues like factions and democracy, all while focusing on the usefulness of the Constitution and the necessity of a strong central government, to defend his Federalist ideology. Personally, I agree with the foundation of his arguments, especially on the topic of forms of government, as well as the role of representation in our government.
The second way in which a pure democracy differs from a republic is that a republic is much better-suited to be extended over, as Madison puts it, a “greater sphere of country”. This second difference between the two forms of government is significant in ensuring the effectiveness of a large republic over a small republic. Madison holds that there are two options in curing the effects of factions. Factions can be cured by either removing their causes or by controlling their effects. Removing the causes of factions is neither practical nor wise, as there are two ways to remove the causes of factions: destroy the liberty that fuels the formation of factions, or force the same interests and opinions on every citizen. Liberty cannot
With comparison between a small and large government, James Madison argues that a larger government, like the one proposed by the new United States Constitution, would protect from the tyranny of the majority that would likely be the result of maintaining a small government. He argues that voters are more likely to elect “fit” representatives, as compared to the higher corruption plausibility present in a smaller government. Madison formulates an important argument in favor of the government presented by the Constitution.
The only way to manage faction is to remove its causes and to control its effects. By removing its causes Madison believes that liberty will be destroyed, or that by giving every citizen the same opinions, passions, and interests, would be impossible because people can never all be the same. Madison wanted the United States to be a republic, a form of democracy in which power is vested in representatives, so there will be a greater number of citizens represented and we will also be able to have more control over the factions effects.
The Federalist Papers Number 10 is written by James Madison and explains the necessity of the Constitution to protect our country from factions. A faction is “a number of citizens, whether amounting to a majority or minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent aggregate interests of the community (Publius, 72).” Publius states that there are two ways to get rid of factions. The first way to eliminate a faction is to take the Liberty away from all of the people in the faction. The other way to cure a faction is to give everyone the same opinion. Both of this solutions are not possible
Before the signing of the Constitution, Madison had several fears of the precedents that he and his country would set for the nation for the following years. During the critical period of history, Madison was extremely cautious on the proceedings of the congress. In Federalist Number 10, he argues under an alias that factions would be detrimental to liberties of Americans. Looking back on history, it is easy to see that factions have not had the effects that Madison had once feared; however, a few have had several negative effects that have threatened certain groups of people, and others have led to corruption in congress.
Federalist No. 10 written by James Madison under a pen name in a New York newspaper, explained the problems with factions and how the constitution would defeat the problem associated with faction. Faction first off is a group of people in a population whether the amount equals up to the majority or minority of the group doesn't matter, only matters that it is a group of the population that doesn't think of the good of the people. According to James Madison in Federalist No. 10 the Constitution would overcome problems of factions because while if a faction is not a majority there is no real concern in a democracy. There is however major concern with a majority-faction democracy, two ways that the nation is protected from this through the constitution
In the Federalist number 10, Madison argued and analyzed the importance of the Constitution that can support the establishment of a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. The essay proposes that the state administrations have not accomplished in resolving factions, but the situation is so challenging
Did you know The Federalist No. 10 is the most studied essay from The Federalist collection? After the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution still required the ratification of the states. Therefore, James Madison dedicated himself to the ratification of the Constitution, but more so, to the philosophy behind the Constitution. In order to convince the people of New York to ratify the Constitution, Madison, joined by like minded John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton, set out author a series of eighty-five essays entitled The Federalist. Despite its diminutive influence on New Yorkers, The Federalist essays have been esteemed for their analysis and insight into the American government. Specifically, The Federalist No. 10 outlined that if a great republic were to succeed,
In the Federalist 10, it is mostly about the constitution. It was written by James Madison, who oversaw it. The main purpose of this article is faction. In politics, faction is people that group themselves. Madison said that in the republic. Madison says that the number one common characteristic is the largest people. The democracy would be possible because you couldn’t create a majority group of people that would have a lot in common. However now, democracy become too big in this scale. People don’t have much in common. That was the anti-federalist concerned. And now Madison came up by saying that just because there are larger group of people that doesn’t mean they are right with what they should say. Majorities are somewhat dangerous; they sometimes do foolish stuff. Also, they somewhat not to be trusted. Now, the fact that the new constitution republic is covering. Democracy is
The federalist papers were an arrangement of eighty-five essays persuading the citizens of New York to ratify the new United States constitution due to lack of performance of the articles of confederation. The people of America needed a government stable and durable enough to maintain national unity over a large geographic area but yet not have absolute power. The essays originally appeared anonymously in the New York newspapers signed Publius and written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and James Madison according to the library of congress and the constitutional rights foundation. In the compilation of persuasion for the new constitution to be established two out of the many federalist papers number 10 and 51 are examples of Madison’s
One argument that federalists made in support of the constitution is that it creates a government that is strong enough to protect both the people and the overall public good from the damage and violence caused by factions. In Essay 10 of the Federalist Papers, James Madison argues that although it is impossible to prevent factions from forming all together, it is possible to minimize the damages they can cause by establishing a representative style government, which prevents factions from both consolidating too much power and overrunning the government. A second argument made by federalists in support of the constitution is that the checks and balances system and the separation of powers are both effective safeguards in protecting the rights
The creation of the United States Constitution of 1787 established the beginning of the federalists representative form of government that exists today. Alexander Hamilton, one of the founding fathers of the Constitution, has played a major role in establishing the current state of Federalism. This paper will examine the role of the different branches of government, the exclusive powers of the federal and state government, the role of the courts in federal-state relations and recommendations for improving the federalists representative form of government.
In the Federalist number 10 and 51, Madison had an new idea of the relationship between gov and society. He argued that the US was not a source of weakness by stability. He also made the liberal idea that men were driven by interest in themselves and that the good of society arises from the clash of private interests popular.
In Federalist No. 10, James Madison wrote that, "Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens,[...]." Madison as well as the other founding fathers were aware of the dangers inherent to direct democracy. For example, one of the main issues of direct democracy is majority rule going to mob rule. A solution to this is the more factions the better. A backwards idea in theory, but it truly works when you have more diversity in a representative democracy. Madison is basically telling us bigger is better and size and variety will decrease the problems when the majoriy rules on certain issues. Using this method, a groups views is less likely to take over. A solution already in place is the bill of rights, the bill