Chapter 7: Answer question 3 on p. 193 of the text. Please include the full text of the question in your answer. You must include a citation for each answer. No citations outside the text are required. However, you may want to cite sources to support your answer. 3. In light of Mill's basic principle, assess the legitimacy of laws (a) requiring the motorist to wear seat belts and motorcyclists to wear helmets. According to Mills freedom provides complete freedom unless it compromises the life or safety of others (Shaw,2014). If the driver drove alone and the use of seat belts or helmets would have no impact on anyone other than the individual, then the individual should be able to determine to what extent they use safety devices. Nonetheless, this assumes responsibility for self and provides that seat belts or helmets would only affect the driver. I can imagine that by not wearing a seat belt or using a helmet may have some impact on others, for instance, being thrown from a car causing someone else to wreck. Even so, if this possibility exists it is probably …show more content…
Removing the stigma from addiction would encourage more to seek treatment as well as lessening the attraction to a counter culture. No one should ever go to prison simply for possession or use of drugs. The basis of criminal justice often is swayed by the public’s approval of punishment. According to Mill (1859), real freedom is following our own path as long as you do not interfere or impede other n their pursuit of freedom (188). When an individual breaks a law that impedes upon the rights of others, that is when the criminal justice system should be involved. Relying on public entities to establish a sense of morality is ridiculous, Mill would argue that an individual has the right to pursue their own happiness even if it is not in their best interest (Shaw,2014). This is an example of people being subjected to the tyranny of the majority
I grew up in a neighborhood which is riddled with crime. Unfortunately, people who I grew up with became involved in gangs and criminal activities. Those actions led to them having a criminal record. When looking through the options of the podcast, People who are involved in the criminal justice system is the one I thought would be most interesting. The person Bradley Jacobs discusses what he does in the Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services (CASES).
Dana Maliepaard was a young girl who went to Glasgow High School and was involved in an unrestrained car accident. Dana’s mother, Christie Maliepaard, believes that it is necessary to share Dana’s story with others so that they may learn from it. Dana’s story is used to show teen drivers that it is not only expected, but necessary to wear a seat belt. By wearing a seat belt when driving a car or riding in one, you are able to not only save your own life, but the ones of the people who care about you.
Therefore, it would be unethical for individual citizens to ignore the governmental requirement for people to use seat belts in their vehicles. Adhering to seat belt laws is important for individuals not only in improving drivers and travelers use of seatbelts through penalty avoidance and police enforcement but also indirectly by enhancing a culture of good ethical behaviors. Additionally, failure to wear seatbelt is dangerous to the individual’s livelihood and health. A person is highly
Many different states have begun sending nonviolent drug offenders to various kinds of drug treatment program the state offers. By doing this, it has significantly reduced the problems with overcrowding. If an individual is arrested and charged with simple possession of a drug and no other crime is being commented, then this person is doing no harm to anyone else. They should be given the opportunity to try and make a change in their life and beat the addiction. Instead, if this person is thrown into jail, they are still going to be an addict with a criminal record now and will not be able to be a contributing member of society. (Everett 1 ).
To begin with, criminal justice is a system that is designed to maintain social control, which means it is a necessary aspect of every society since “Laws are the conditions under which independent and isolated men united to form a society” (Beccaria, 1764: 16). In order words, crime control deals with the methods that are taken by a society to reduce its crime. As a matter of fact, there are various crime control strategies from community policing to risk assessments. In addition to the different tactics for controlling crime, there are several theories that not only attempt to explain the causes of crime, but also outline different ways to handle offenders; for example, deterrence, rehabilitation, and even retribution.
In chapters six through ten of The Collapse of American Criminal Justice, Stuntz talks about the changes that were being made in the criminal justice system, and the changes that can help fix the system. He goes in details when it comes changes in the system, from the courts putting limits on what the criminal procedure, for example, the “exclusionary rule”. Also the mention of the rise and fall of crime across the United States. Lastly, mentioning the famous landmark cases that helped sparked these changes.
2. For defense attorneys a “successful” case often means a reduction in sentence via a plea bargain, not
The harsh drug related punishments implemented through the War on Drugs were intended to prevent people from getting involved in drug use and business. However, studies have demonstrated that mass incarceration has the opposite effect. Mass incarceration is largely the result
I lost a relative in a car crash. Can you imagine how I felt when I found out? He wasn’t wearing his seatbelt and was thrown off the road through the windshield. Car companies should start making cars that require everybody in the vehicle buckled up or else the car won’t start. Wearing a seatbelt reduces the chances of injury, also the law requires you to wear a seatbelt.
7. Both Tiger and Kaye question the notion of drug courts as a positive, liberal alternative to imprisonment. Tiger focuses on how drug courts attempt to merge the criminalization and medicalization of addiction, which she argues are contradictory approaches to treatment (Tiger 2011, 170). She expands on this contradiction by discussing how drug courts use medical terminology in their treatment, yet include very few actual medical professionals in treatment (Ibid, 179). She notes that the main figure in drug court treatment appears to be the judge, a clear figure of criminalization that takes control of treatment (Ibid, 177). The inclusion of the judge in the treatment of what is called a disease is inherently contradictory and only serves
This weeks reading covered several areas first What is Criminal Justice, next The Crime Picture, and finally The Search for Causes. All three of these sections focused on crime and its impact in America. Setting the tone for the remainder of this course and building the initial foundation for the basic thought process and understanding in criminal justice. The first chapter What is Criminal Justice starts with crime in America and describes it as an ebb and flow as if coming in waves.
Those incarcerated today are not given the chance to change their behavior patterns, especially when it is in regard to drug addiction. The criminal justice system in general does not consider drug abuse as anything but a crime and does not think about treating the disease of addiction in order to reduce or eliminate the crimes that come as a
1) The theme in which the textbook builds upon is the needs of both individual and public order. Balancing both the rights by evenly distributing people rights with the use of public order from criminal justice. 2) Justice is fairness and having moral righteousness. The chapter discusses justice, social justice civil justice, criminal justice and, administration of justice. Criminal justice like social justice both seek to maintain an upright position between right and wrong.
An enormous division currently exists between the people who believe that automobile safety should be an option and those that feel it must be a requirement. The federal government feels the morally obligated to create the safest driving environment possible. On the other end of the spectrum, opinions exist that the average driver has ability to make the choice of safety on their own. Editorials, political assemblies, debates, and conversations have arrived on the concept of click it or ticket. This idea refers to ticketing any motor vehicle driver and passenger that is not fastened by a seat belt. Arguments have been made for both sides, and have been reviewed in multiple states.
There are many factors that are included in a vehicle to keep everyone safe. One of these, is the seat belt. Safety comes first when someone gets in a vehicle. Seat belts save the lives of many people everyday. When seat belts were invented, they were put into every vehicle to keep people from flying out a window when involved in a wreck. There are statistics that show that wearing a seat belt decreases the possibility of being injured to the point of death.