Barriers In APRN Research

In the Texas, state law prohibits Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs) including nurse practitioners (NPs) from practicing to the full extent of their education and clinical ability. Currently, Texas law requires than an APRN receive approval from an individual physician prior to engaging in the practice of advanced nursing. This type of complex regulatory scheme is outdated and restricts patients’ access to care, creates geographic disparities in services, and unnecessarily increases health care costs. For example, current law requires APRNs to meet periodically face-to-face with a supervising physician; with few physicians choosing to practice in rural areas, many APRNs who are willing to work in rural areas are essentially forbidden from delivering care to these underserved areas.

This paper explores the perception of clinical practitioners to the change in policy related to the advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) full practice authority. The author conducts a one-on-one, open-ended interview of 5 nurse practitioners and 5 physicians licensed to practice in Maryland on their perceptions of the recent passage of the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse Full Practice Authority. A literature review was conducted in a policy report by the professional nursing organization, and discussion within the peer-reviewed article supported an overview, regulatory differences among 50 states, including the District of Columbia. Their policy implication for enhancing APRNs role nationally. The author discusses a critical component

With the passing of the Affordable Care Act in 2010 approximately 32 million more people will be insured throughout the United States. The need for healthcare workers and providers will be in drastic demand to provide care to these insured Americans. The 2010 IOM report details out how the advanced practice nurse can be a valuable asset in primary, chronic and transitional care and their skill set should be used to promote better healthcare across the nation (IOM, 2010). This impact of this report should help progress advanced practice nurse’s ability to practice without individual state regulation and be governed under one body to server in and outside of the hospital setting

The Texas Nurses Association is a strong proponent of permitting APRN’s to practice with full authority using their clinical skills and education to their fullest potential (Cates, 2017, p. 2)l. The TNA is a member of the APRN Alliance, which encompasses four statewide associations (Cates, 2017, p. 2). The APRN Alliance joined forces with the Coalition for Health Care Access (CHCA). This coalition is comprised of “over 20 business, consumer-advocacy, and health care stakeholder groups” (Cusack, 2017, p. 2). Currently, APRN’s barriers include expenses associated with partnering physicians (Holmes & Kinsey-Weathers, 2016). Granting APRN’s full practice authority would results in a monetary loss to these physicians. The AMA and AAFP oppose the passing of HB 1415 (Hooker & Muchow, 2015, p. 89). The pushback from these organizations stands regardless of strong evidence of the positive outcomes with allowing APRN’s full practice authority.

In recent years, APRNs have been very vocal through many nursing coalitions and associations. The voices of all ARNPs seeking full practice authority has been heard with the proposed bills. The Florida Panhandle Nurse Practitioner Coalition (FRNPC), has given information to all ARNPs to keep ahead in legislative issues. A white paper published by the American College of Physicians have been shared to all Floridian ARNPs through the

Over the past few decades, many drastic changes occurred in U.S health care delivery.   Our current healthcare trends demand nurses to take more active role in the health care decisions in hospital setting, long term care setting and in community healthcare setting. Since “nursing is based upon a body of knowledge that is always changing with new discoveries and innovation” Potter and Perry (2005), nursing profession is compelled to grow from being just a traditional bedside nurse. IOM’s future of nursing report which is released in 2010 calls nurses to be “more highly educated, diverse nursing workforce”.

Healthcare reform in the United States (U.S.), continues to be a hot topic in the news. Whether it discusses how the program will be financed, the need to redesign the organization, or how the process of delivering healthcare will be implemented; one thing that is a frontrunner, is the need for registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) to fill the increased demands on the primary care system (Institute of Medicine, & Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2011, p. 375). “Several programs and initiatives included in the health reform legislation involve interdisciplinary and cross-setting care coordination and care management services of RNs” (Institute of Medicine, & Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, 2011, p. 377).

The report shows that the part of nursing must be expanded so that nurses are able to practice to the fullest degree of their education and training. Currently, advanced practice nurses (APRNs) work according to the scope of practice guidelines set forth by their individual state, meaning these highly educated nurses may not be working to the extent of their training but to the individual state laws. The report offers recommendations to streamline these idiosyncrasies and get rid of the red tape so that nurses can work in their appropriate manner and deliver safe quality care to some 32 million Americans who will before long gain access to health care services (American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN], 2012). The report correspondingly finds that nurses need to attain advanced levels of education and training through an enhanced education structure which encourages a cohesive academic progression as to safeguard the delivery of quality health care services. Patients are becoming progressively more complex and nurses need to attain the proper skills to care for these persons. Nursing education must embrace the continuous move towards a streamline approach to higher degree programs (Institute of Medicine [IOM], 2010, p. 2). Nurse residency programs

Defining the scope of practice for an advanced practice nurse (APRN) can be a difficult task. Currently, in the United States, each state has its own policies regarding APRN scope of practice. State policies/laws vary from restrictive to independent. States under a restrictive policy of APRN scope of practice may have strict physician collaboration regulations. For example Missouri requires the collaborating physician to review a percentage of charts and be within so many miles of the APRN’s work place. Restrictive scope of practice can also limit prescriptive authority and decrease reimbursement of services (Hain & Fleck, 2014). States with more independent scope of

Expanding the scope of practice for APRN remains a controversial issue in Missouri, where I currently reside. Expanding the scope of practice also remains an issue for the health care field nationwide. Stakeholders that I can identify include The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF), APRN Consensus Work Group, National Council State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), APRN Advisory Committee, along with other health care organizations, health care educators, and health care providers nationwide (IOM Report., n.d., p. 133). Focusing in on Missouri, the stakeholders for this endeavor include health care

As resistant as some states’ legislative and regulatory bodies are to grant APNs autonomy of practice, the damage being done by over-regulation is clear (Safriet, 1992). Physicians are forced into a position to either supervise the APN’s practice or be constantly consulted for approval of their practice decisions. Safriet (1992) described that in and of itself, this constant supervision may appear to patients that the APN is not competent to provide adequate or care equivalent to that of a physician. If the role of the APN is to bridge gaps in health care by relieving the medical establishment of some of the patient load by performing the same function as a physician in a primary care setting, it seems wholly unnecessary to restrain their scope of practice in those areas. This type of restrictions affect cost and patient care accessibility (Safriet, 1992). This was a problem stated in the article, however 25 years later, populations of patients remain unseen or cared for and APNs continue to be underutilized (Safriet, 1992). Rigolosi and Salmond (2014) cite the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) when they state that not utilizing nurse practitioners due to practice restrictions costs $9 billion annually in the US (p. 649).

The APRN is uniquely skilled and trained to meet this growing need, and policy should focus on expanding the role and autonomy of APRNs, and increasing funding, and possibly diminishing the reimbursement gap in order to attract and sustain a greater number of providers in underserved areas and provide them with the financial resources to remain viable, independent providers. Nurse Practitioners are more likely to work in primary care and in rural areas, particularly, remote rural areas,which are characteristically similar to underserved areas, than are

There is an increasing demand for nurse practitioners, which makes this a crucial period in the development of their practice and profession. Nurse practitioners must face increased opportunity and continuing opposition towards independent practice all while defining their role in health care delivery and establishing their connections. The practice of nurse practitioners still varies widely across the states. These inconsistencies make it difficult for nurse practitioners as well as patients when practice

The Board of Nursing in California provides specific guidelines by which a registered nurse can become a nurse practitioner (NP) by means of acquiring advanced practice education. The additional preparation will help the NP in assessing and managing the healthcare needs of their patient population. In 2008 there were an estimated 145,000 NPs nationwide and 13,649 in California (Christian, S., & Dower, J.D., 2008). Although there are federal mandates for the NP role in primary care, the majority of the educational guidelines and scope of practice rules fall to individual states. This creates disparities between states that are evident by the differences in the outlined scope of practice for an NP.

The issue that can create an impact in the practice of the APRNs it is not uniform. One of the main problems in the nursing career is the different type of practice from each state. According to Timmons (2016), each state has their own rules and their regulations for the APRNs. This is the biggest issues in providing the real care to our patients. According to Yee, Boukus, Cross, and Samuel (2013), the clinical role of NPs is governed largely by state scope-of-practice (SOP) laws that determine the range of services NPs can provide and the extent to which they can practice independently. The curriculum and the training are kind of the same almost in every state; nevertheless, the scope of practice is controversial. To benefit the patient’s