preview

Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967

Decent Essays

What is ageism; is it discrimination? Isn’t discrimination illegal? Many businesses are biased against older workers and openly discriminate. Some biases and stereotypes are based on a belief that older workers are less productive, technologically deficient, and set in their ways. No credence is afforded to the aging applicant for his knowledge and experience, devaluing his work-related contributions. Ageism biases and stereotypes lead hiring managers to promptly sideline or effectively trash the resume of the older job seeker. The dismissal of the resume means an opportunity lost for both the applicant and the company. Many unemployed applicants, age fifty and older with years of experience and knowledge, have difficulty procuring employment …show more content…

businesses. The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals, employees and job applicants, who are forty years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age. Despite the ADEA’s outlawing of age discrimination almost fifty years ago, “the trend of age-related workplace discrimination charges filed with the [U.S. Equal employment Opportunity Commission] EEOC is discouraging, but not unexpected” (Barrington 36). In 1993, 10% of the filings with the EEOC were for age discrimination, increasing to 30% in 2010, however a consistent climb began in 2000. The age discrimination filings were not limited to specific industries nor company size, as the filing percentage proved to be constant across all businesses and …show more content…

Fritzsche and Marcus, from the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, conducted a study on age discrimination of older workers who are changing jobs within the same field as their experience compared to changing jobs and seeking a position in a different field. The study analyzed the same type of groups with younger applicants. The study results indicated that the age discrimination towards the older applicants was consistent. The younger subjects with no experience were chosen over the older adults with experience because of age; discrimination trumped experience. When neither group had experience, youth was preferred again. Fritzsche’s summation of the study included that younger job applicants received higher suitability ratings than older job applicants (Fritzsche). Age discrimination is real. One factor examined in this study was how the applicant’s experience played into the hiring decision. It would be no surprise to see the study results reflecting that an experienced person, young or old, would be chosen over one with no experience. Therefore, the length of experience was not provided, in the study, to prevent introducing a fluctuating factor; the intention was that all criteria evaluated was consistent except age. The surprising part was that younger applicants were preferred even if the older applicant had experience and the younger had none. This

Get Access