Screen Shot 2024-03-15 at 1

.png

School

Henry Ford College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

253

Subject

Law

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

png

Pages

1

Uploaded by SEANJOHN190 on coursehero.com

Question 1 What was the question the Supreme Court of Ohio decide was the "proper" question? Incorrect 0.00 points out a. Whether the promotional material was purchased for resale? % of 1.00 ¥ Flag b. Whether the consideration was bargained for. o c. Whether the promotional material was given away. d. Whether there was consideration in the transaction between the Cincinnati Reds and their fans. Your answer is incorrect. If the promotional material was purchased for resale, Ohio would not impose a tax. But if the promotional material were "give aways" there would be a tax. Thus, the question in this case is whether fans purchased the promotional material that had previously been purchased by the Cincinnati Reds ball club. The correct answer is: Whether the consideration was bargained for. Question 2 The decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio was that Correct 1.00 points out a. consideration existed in exchange for tickets that include the price of the promotional arad material. " Flag question b. no consideration is given because the promotional material is worth so much less than the cost of a ticket at a Major League Baseball game. c. consideration is given when fans purchase the promotional material.
Discover more documents: Sign up today!
Unlock a world of knowledge! Explore tailored content for a richer learning experience. Here's what you'll get:
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help