From this figure, which of the following statements is correct? Figure Question 5 options: An inequality-averse citizen may choose point F . An inequality - neutral citizen would choose point A. An inequality - averse citizen does not care about his own income or wealth. An inequality-averse citizen would choose point E. บ Su

The following questions list 10 cases of two distributions of income, in each of states "A" and "B." (You can think of A and B as with and without some policy change.) In each case there are three people only (in last three cases four people), and their incomes are the numbers given. So in the first question, the first person in state A has an income of $1 (think of this as $1 per hour, or day), while the second person has $2, and the third has $3. In state B the same three people have incomes of $2, $4 and $6 respectively. There are no other differences between states A and B, and no other differences between people besides their incomes as indicated. Your task is simple and it should not take more than a few minutes. Tell me which state (if either) in each question has higher "inequality." You should assume that everything else is identical between the two states; all that differs is the incomes of the people. This is entirely your judgment, given how you interpret the concept of…

Suppose there are two possible income distributionsin a society of ten people. In the first distribution,nine people have incomes of $60,000 and one personhas an income of $20,000. In the second distribution,all ten people have incomes of $50,000.a. If the society had the first income distribution,what would be the utilitarian argument forredistributing income?b. Which income distribution would Rawls considermore equitable? Explain.c. Which income distribution would Nozick considermore equitable? Explain.

What is income inequality in economics. Define it with the help of example.

Suppose the teacher for your course, "Principles of Economics" is a libertarian and adheres strictly by its principles in running your economics class. What policies would you expect your teacher to institute? Policies a Libertarian Would Enforce Policies a Libertarian Would Not Enforce The teacher, seeing grade inequality, decides to give points from the best student's test to the worst's students test. The teacher decides to give everyone in the class an A. The teacher punishing a student for cheating on her income equality and poverty homework assignment. Grade the class on a curve to ensure even grade distribution. When proctoring a test, your teacher requires all students to be given the test face down and all turn over your tests at the same time so that no one has a time advantage.

Answer this question under 100 words and draw a Lorenz graph to explain it. In the Financial Times’ article “How the pandemic is worsening inequality” (31 Dec 2020) we can read: “About 600m people work globally in the hardest-hit sectors such as hospitality and retail [...]. In addition, the informal economy has been hard-hit – and that is where some of the world’s most vulnerable workers are employed. [...] At the height of the pandemic-induced surge in unemployment, joblessness among people aged 15 to 24 in OECD countries was 7.5 percentage points higher than the start of this year, whereas among those aged 25 and over it rose by 3.2 percentage points. Pandemic-induced job losses have potentially long-lasting consequences: people who start their career during a recession experience lower earnings for a decade after graduation. [...] Around the world, relatively privileged workers have avoided the worst of the pandemic’s economic impact. Up to 40 per cent of those in the ILO’s top…

As coronavirus deepens inequality, inequality worsens its spread. Explain with comprehensive what the government can do to overcome or at least minimize the problems raised in the article

Your friend points to the wages earned by your economics professor and her teaching assistant (TA) as an example of income inequality. Your tenured professor earns $120,000$120,000, drives a BMW, and vacations in Europe, whereas your TA earns $10,000$10,000 per year, rides a bike, and vacations at his mom's house. Because they both teach for a living, your friend argues that this income inequality is not just.   Which reply uses the economic life cycle to respond to your friend's argument?   Your professor has more bargaining power than your TA and, therefore, has higher earnings.   Your professor and TA earn different amounts now but they will have similar earnings over the course of their lives. Your professor was once a TA, and your TA will one day make better money.   Your professor has many more responsibilities than your TA and is, therefore, paid more.   Older workers typically have more expenses than younger workers due to the high cost of healthcare and other costs…

The table shows the distribution of income in the Australia Complete the column of the table that records the cumulative percentages of income in Australia received by the cumulative percentages of households. Cumulative percentage of Income Households Lowest 20 percent (percentage) Households Income 8 Lowest 20 13 Lowest 40 Second 20 percent Third 20 percent 18 Fourth 20 percent 23 Highest 20 percent 38 Lowest 60 Lowest 80 100 100.0 The graph shows the Lorenz curve for the United States Draw the line of equality Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 40 percent of Australian households Label it 1, Draw a point to show the cumulative percentage of income received by the lowest 80 percent of Australian households. Label it 2 Draw the Lorenz curve for Australia. Label it Based on the data provided, which country has the more unequal income distribution? OA Australa OB. Neither. They have the same degree of inequality. OC, The United States OD. It…

1. An economy's Lorenz Curve reveals that an economy's highest income quintile has 65% of the economy's income while the lowest income quintile only has 5% of the economy's income. Solely based on the Lorenz Curve, is this distribution of income fair? Why or why not?   2. To combat income inequality and to generate increased tax revenues to fund expenditures, government officials decide to aggressively increase how progressive income taxes are, so much so that the top income earners are marginally taxed 90% of their income (and while this marginal tax rate may seem oppressive, these top income earners still have more than enough income to satisfy all of their needs and all but the most extravagant of wants - basically, these earners have more than enough money). Argue why this tax policy is a fair approach to fund government expenditures. Why might this tax policy fail to achieve its objectives (tax revenues would actually decline as a result)?