The Perils Of Indifference Essay

Sort By:
Page 1 of 25 - About 250 essays
  • Decent Essays

    Moral Responsibility Many people believe there is not a dividing line between ignorance and indifference, but they are more similar/connected to each other than people think and are the opposite of moral responsibility. In both the story “Night” and Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” the Americans(President) and the Germans both showed indifference toward the Jew during the Holocaust and World War II, which proves people are willing to sacrifice others to keep themselves safe and not get

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Perils Of Indifference

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages

    for the topics they discuss, or by appealing to ultimate authorities on the matter. In “On Women's Right to Vote”, Susan B. Anthony quotes the Constitution to demonstrate that women should have the ability to vote in all elections. In “The Perils of Indifference” Elie Wiesel describes the importance of people remaining politically involved to encourage progress in their country. In both of these speeches, Anthony and Wiesel provide the audience with information they would use to help promote equality

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Indifference “elicits no response.” Indifference “is not a response.” Famous author and Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference” informs the audience about the dangers of indifference. He supports his claim by first giving a dictionary definition of indifference, then talking about his personal experiences and then about examples in history when we were indifference. Wiesel's purpose is to illustrate the dangers of indifference using his own personal experiences

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout history indifference among people has caused countless disputes that end badly. At the White House on April 12, 1999 there was a speech given by Eliezer Wiesel, that speech was “The Perils of Indifference”. The speech was given to Mr. and Mrs. Clinton (Mr. Clinton was the President at the time), members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke, Excellencies, and all Americans, but today everyone can learn and be influenced by this speech. The author himself is a Jewish man that lived through

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Writer, Elie Wiesel in his metaphorical speech “The perils of Indifference” argues that the future will never know the agony of the Holocaust and they will never understand the tragedy of the horrific terror in Germany. Wiesel wants people to not let this happen but at the time many modern genocides that are occurring and people shouldn’t be focused on just the Holocaust, they should focus on making this world a better place; moreover, Wiesel expresses his thoughts about all the genocides that has

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Perils of Indifference speech by Elie Wiesel is a moving speech that makes the reader question how they react to suffering and indifference. It will make the reader think about whether he or she is indifferent to something. When the speaker said it is, “Easier to look away from victims… much easier to avoid”, this is true to today’s society (“Perils of Indifference,” 1999). In today’s society, people are only looking out for themselves and if something happened to another person, they would rather

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “The Perils of Indifference” Rhetorical Analysis In his moving speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, of 1999, Ellie Wiesel, a Jewish Holocaust survivor with firsthand experience of ethnic cleansing and oppression, strongly encourages his widely varied audience from around the world to promote change and ensure that they won’t make the same mistakes their ancestors had made 45 years earlier during World War II. Wiesel’s purpose is to convince the current and upcoming generations to protect their

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wiesel, in his speech, "The Perils of Indifference," argues that indifference can destroy mankind as it can obliterate a person's humanity. He supports his claim by first expressing his gratitude for his audience for their fight against insouciance to gain their trust, then uses logical reasoning to convey that the United States has committed acts of indifference to showcase the severity of the situation, and evokes emotion by proclaiming how children endure indifference. Wiesel's purpose is to expose

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What is more hurtful than words and actions? Indifference is the lack of interest, concern, or sympathy. In the “The Perils of Indifference,”, the author, Elie Wiesel, claims that indifference is more dangerous than violence. He uses strong word choice, emotional appeal, anecdotes, logical appeal, and ethical appeal to support his claim and convince his listeners that indifference is harmful in many ways. First, the author supports his claim that indifference is more harmful by using emotional appeal

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nobel Peace Prize recipient, Elie Wiesel in his straightforward speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” asserts that the inhumanity of indifference is still relevant today and can have negative effects on humanity unless society acts to abolish indifference. He develops his message through highlighting his experience in the holocaust as well as the multitude of tragedies that had occurred that century and how indifference can be handled; he states “Society was composed of three simple categories: the

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
Previous
Page12345678925