is, in order to get and keep a good paying job, you need both “street smarts” and “book smarts.” The combination of practical knowledge and explicit knowledge is the key to a successful career. Both types of knowledge have distinct advantages. They have both used their experiences in life to achieve their goals. For example, if a street smart
In Gerald Graff’s essay, “Hidden Intellectualism” he discusses the topic of street smarts and book smarts. Graff explains that many say it is sad, and a waste to see people who are street smart yet, cannot apply themselves in academics in the same manner. Graff believes that schools and colleges are at fault. He suggests that schools and colleges overlook the intellectual potential of street smarts. Graff states, “We associate the educated life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively
educated. Furthermore, Graff shares a passion for sports but is seen as a non academic activity compared to book smart people. Growing up, the only “book smart” people were into academic studies while “street smart” people were athletes. The learning environment needs to understand that “street smart” students will be more engaged in writing an essay about sports, cars, fashion and other topics versus writing about Plato and Shakespeare. The author claims,”The only reading I cared to do or could do was
In Hidden Intellectualism, Gerald Graff explains his views on street smarts being just as good if not better than academic smarts. Graff claims that when giving the opportunity to learn using things that spark their interest students are more likely to develop intellectual identities. He offers his experience dealing with streets smarts and his love for sports magazines to support his claim. In his teens, Graff was anti-intellectualism and growing up in Chicago, literacy was seen as disrespectful
seen as a non academic activity compared to book smart people. Growing up, book smart people were those considered to enjoy academic studies while street smarts were considered athletes. Street smart students will be more engaged in writing an essay about sports, cars, fashion and other topics versus writing about Plato and Shakespeare. In Graffs own experience, he was torn between being smart or street smart because he feared that if he was too smart then the hoods wouldn’t accept him. Being tough
Dictionary, the term “street-smarts” is defined as “The experience and knowledge necessary to deal with the potential difficulties or dangers of life in an urban environment”. This term is often seen more negatively in the context of college acceptance and level of general intelligence. The idea of street smarts and book smarts is argued in terms of good and bad or good and bad judgment. Success has been determined in society as a well balance of both street smarts and book smarts. Intelligence, like
Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff is street smarts versus book smarts. Gerald Graff is an English professor at the University of Illinois and has written many books. The author claims that people are better off if they are more street smart than book smart. The authors is very persuasive using real life examples. I although disagree with this claim. I think that you need an equal mix of both street and book smarts. The author starts by saying that everyone knows someone who is street smart but doesn't do well in
most of the intelligent players. Now, let’s imagine that all fit players all teamed up and outsmarted the smart player by forming an alliance to pick them off one by one. Suddenly, the fit characters would control the game, therefore changing their fate in the game. In Gerald Graff’s essay “Hidden Intellectualism,” I’ve interpreted that he believes if given the opportunity that street smarts individuals
In Hidden Intellectualism by Gerald Graff, he begins with the argument of “street-smarts” versus “school-smarts”. Graff explains that school-smarts can be hidden within street smarts and can be learnt through not just talking with friends, but also from the media and our surroundings, hence the “hidden” intellectualism. He goes onto explain that “schools and colleges overlook the intellectual potential of street-smarts” (198) because these types of intellectualism are actually considered anti-intellectualism
“What Is Intelligence, Anyway?” by Issac Asimov, in this essay, Asimov talks about different types of intelligence. Such as book smarts versus mechanical aptitude. Issac Asimov talks about how he scored the highest on the intelligence test in the army. He also compared himself to a fellow army member that works on auto-repair and couldn’t score more then 80 in his eyes, but always went to the auto-repairmen to fix his car because he didn’t know nothing about cars. Intelligent Issac Asimov, was smarter