Prison Experiment Essay

Charlie Parrish Mrs. Gumina English III, Hr. 4 18 March 2015 Introduction The Stanford Prison experiment was conducted in 1971, during the summer, at Stanford University. The mastermind behind the experiment was Philip G. Zimbardo, a psychologist and a professor at Stanford University. To help closely simulate a prison environment they called upon an expert. “Our study of prison life began, then, with an average group of healthy, intelligent, middle class males” (Zimbardo 4). With this group of

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained

outcomes. Philip G. Zimbardo, author of “The Stanford Prison Experiment”, held an experiment at the Stanford College to study the behavior in prison situations. Another experiment was held at Yale University by Stanley Milgram, author of “Perlis to Obedience.” These experiments have proven to show the change in behavior occurs in many situations. There is evidence that people conform to the role that they are appointed to. Participants in both experiments had a tough time adjusting to the idea of what was

This essay is an investigation of the application from the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment to some similar scenarios that demonstrate the same or similar findings found within the Stamford Prison Experiment that were influenced by external factors and influences. The Stamford Prison Experiment was conducted to investigate how subtle people are to conform to roles of the guard and prisoner in a mock prison environment and if the behaviours were influenced by the environment or by sadistic personalities

conducted their experiments they did not breach any ethical guidelines since they did not exist (Matta, 2014). Hence, to protect the welfare, rights, dignity, and mental health of the participants, strict ethical guidelines were introduced in psychological experiments which have positively influenced the field of psychology. Also, due to ethical frameworks, people are viewed as ‘participants’ of a study instead of ‘subjects’ in an experiment. They also make psychological experiments more reputable

Nathan Mariano Estepa September 13, 2015 Stanford Prison Experiment Zimbardo decided to run an experiment where he would turn a basement under the Stanford campus into a mock prison where he would interview several participants where they would randomly get assigned either guard, or prisoner. Zimbardo aimed to see how everyone pertained the roles they were placed in. Interviewing 75 potential participants, Zimbardo only chose 24 male college students which they received payments of $15/day. They

Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison Purpose Craig Haney, Curtis Banks and Philip Zimbardo are the authors of A Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison and published the article in September 1973. The purpose of the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment was to grasp a greater knowledge of, “the basic psychological mechanisms of human aggression.” (Haney, Banks, & Zimbardo, 1973, pg. 1) Creating a simulated prison environment did this. During this experiment, a greater understanding of

Ethics in Experiments: The Stanford Prison Experiment Lyndsey Brady Brigham Young University I chose to read and research more about the Stanford Prison Experiment that was headed by Philip Zimbardo. He conducted this experiment as a way to “demonstrate the power of social situations to distort personal identities and long cherished values and morality as students internalized situated identities in their roles as prisoners and guards” (Zimbardo, Research, 2004). On one of his websites

1. Topic and Hypothesis: The Stanford Prison Experiment is the topic that is under discussion. It entails the study of prisoners that were in a make-believe prison. It is common knowledge that when one is in prison, they lose freedom and there are rules that they have to conform to under the stewardship of the guards who look after them round the clock. The hypothesis that Dr. Zimbardo had is that anonymity, depersonalization and dehumanization of prisoners promotes their submissive and docile nature

Psychological Effects of Prison “Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment remains an important study in our understanding of how situational forces can influence human behavior” (Cherry).“The purpose was to understand the development of norms and the effects of roles, labels, and social expectations in a simulated prison environment” (“Stanford Prison Experiment”). What was supposed to be a two week experiment only went on for six days because Philip G. Zimbardo says “our guards became sadistic