25 - Which of the following statements is CORRECT? If you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a riskless portfolio. The beta coefficient of a stock is normally found by regressing past returns on a stock against past market returns. One could also construct a scatter diagram of returns on the stock versus those on the market, estimate the slope of the line of best fit, and use it as beta. However, this historical beta may differ from the beta that exists in the future. The beta of a portfolio of stocks is always larger than the betas of any of the individual stocks. It is theoretically possible for a stock to have a beta of 1.0. If a stock did have a beta of 1.0, then, at least in theory, its required rate of return would be equal to the risk-free (default-free) rate of return. The beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

Historical beta is the beta which is being calculated on the basis of past return of the company…

Answered: Which of the following statements is…

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter8: Analysis Of Risk And Return

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6P

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

25 - Which of the following statements is CORRECT?

If you found a stock with a zero historical beta and held it as the only stock in your portfolio, you would by definition have a riskless portfolio.
The beta coefficient of a stock is normally found by regressing past returns on a stock against past market returns. One could also construct a scatter diagram of returns on the stock versus those on the market, estimate the slope of the line of best fit, and use it as beta. However, this historical beta may differ from the beta that exists in the future.
The beta of a portfolio of stocks is always larger than the betas of any of the individual stocks.
It is theoretically possible for a stock to have a beta of 1.0. If a stock did have a beta of 1.0, then, at least in theory, its required rate of return would be equal to the risk-free (default-free) rate of return.
The beta of a portfolio of stocks is always smaller than the betas of any of the individual stocks.

Expert Solution

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Knowledge Booster

Learn more about

Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.

Similar questions