The Old Familiar and The Beehive are the only two bistros in town. Each is trying to decide whether or not it should advertise in the local newspaper. The accompanying payoff table gives their weekly profits under each possible outcome. The Beehive The Beehive does advertise does not advertise The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $X in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $Y in profits. earns $2,250 in profits. The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $2,000 in profits. earns $2,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does not advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $4,000 in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. a. Which combination or combinations of X and Y would make a situation in which The Old Familiar does not advertise and The Beehive advertises a Nash equilibrium?

The Old Familiar and The Beehive are the only two bistros in town. Each is trying to decide whether or not it should advertise in the local newspaper. The accompanying payoff table gives their weekly profits under each possible outcome. The Beehive The Beehive does advertise does not advertise The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $X in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $Y in profits. earns $2,250 in profits. The Old Familiar The Old Familiar earns $2,000 in profits. earns $2,500 in profits. The Old Familiar does not advertise The Beehive The Beehive earns $4,000 in profits. earns $3,500 in profits. a. Which combination or combinations of X and Y would make a situation in which The Old Familiar does not advertise and The Beehive advertises a Nash equilibrium?

Microeconomics A Contemporary Intro

10th Edition

ISBN:9781285635101

Author:MCEACHERN

Publisher:MCEACHERN

Chapter10: Monopolistic Competition And Oligopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13PAE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

12. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer, are the only sellers of espresso in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Bean Bruuer Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise Hatte Latte Doesn't Advertise 9,9 3,15 15,3 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Bean Bruuer advertises and Hatte Latte does not advertise, Bean Bruuer will make a profit of $15 million, and Hatte Latte will make a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer are both profit-maximizing firms. If Hatte Latte chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a profit of $ million if Bean Bruuer If Hatte Latte chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer…
Use the payoff matrix below to answer the next two questions. a. b. C. d. Topco does not advertise a. b. Topco advertises C. d. Acme does not advertise Both firms earn profits of $50 million. 30. Suppose Acme and Topco must choose whether or not to advertise without knowing what the other will do. In the Nash equilibrium: Topco earns profits of $60 million and Acme earns profits of $30 million. Acme advertises Topco earns profits of $30 million and Acme earns profits of $60 million Both firms earn profits of $40 million. 31. Which strategies maximize Acme's and Topco's combined profit? Neither advertises neither Acme nor Topco chooses to advertise. both Acme and Topco choose to advertise. Acme advertises, but Topco does not. Topco advertises, but Acme does not. Both advertise Acme advertises, but Topco does not Topco advertises, but Acme does not
You are playing a game with a friend. It’s yourmove but you don’t have a dominant strategy.Your payoff depends on what your friend doesafter your move. You consider flipping a coin todecide what to do. You are about to reach for acoin, but then you realize that your friend has adominant strategy. Explain how using backwardinduction (rather than a coin toss) will now determine your next move
. OPEC, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, was founded in 1969. Their original objective was to form a cartel to increase the price that they receive for their oil exports. Create a prisoner’s dilemma type game for two large members of OPEC (e.g. Saudi Arabia and Indonesia). Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of these two countries. Verbally explain how you got your numbers. Find the Nash equilibrium. Based on this model, what strategy is in the oil exporters’ best interest (Nash or otherwise)? How do they make it happen? Create another prisoner’s dilemmamodel for all of OPEC on one side, and all non OPEC oil exporting nations on the other side. Create numbers, where payoffs are total annual oil export revenues for each of the two sides. Verbally explain how you created your numbers. Also create your numbers applying the fact that OPEC’s total production capacity is greater than total non OPEC exports…
Is this strategy a sub-game perfect Nash Equilibrium? Player 2: a c e Player 1: A DE C 2 True False A d B e a 2 1 2 1 A D E חח 0 0 1 F -1 1000
Exercise A.4Explain and graphically represent the equilibria of the Cournot and Bertrand duopoly models. Indicate if they are Nash equilibria and why. Reason your answer.
Please look at the payoff matrix below which shows the benefits that would accrue to each player in a 2-player.non-sequential, non-repeated game. a) Identify the collusive (cooperative) equilibrium. b) Identify the secure strategy (maximin) equilibrium c) Identify the maximax equilibrium d) Identify the Nash equilibrium Apple Inc. Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 20 40 60 60 1000 200 Strategy A 70 50 90 Banana Inc. 400 70 300 Strategy B 40 80 100 90 150 80 Strategy C
II.2 Companies A and B can compete on advertising or R&D. The profits (in millions of $ million) of the two firms are given in the table below assumig that they play a one-shot simultancous mov game (the profit or firm A is listed first in every cell of the matrix, followed by the profit of firm B): Advertising R&D 50, 25 10, 70 20, 40 60, 35 1. Find the mixed strategy equilibrium. A\B Advertising R&D 2. What are the expected profits for both firms in this equilibrium?
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
mall Dynaco Jains Pynaco gains 4. Synergy and Dynaco are the only two firms in a specific high - tech industry. They face the following payoff matrix as they determine the size of their research budget: Synergy's Deeision Small Bodget Lange Budget Synergy gain $420M Symedgy Dynaco ins Large budget Dynaro gains $30M Synergy Small Dynaco Jains Budget Jains zero Dynae's 2ero gains $70m Synergy Pynaco gains gains #50M Decision a. Does Synergy have a dominant strategy? Explain. b. Does Dynaco have a dominant strategy? Explain. c. Is there a Nash equilibrium for this scenario? Explain. (Hint: Look closely at the definition of Nash equilibrium.)
The next three questions pertain to the following normal-form game played by Pepsi and Coke: Coke Pepsi → | Advertise Don't 3.3 0,5 Advertise 5.0 Don't 4,4 7. Write in the blank Coke's best response to Pepsi, if Pepsi Advertises, 8. If the firms could collude, what pair of actions would they try and agre0 on (write "Advertise" or "Dont" on the line)? Pepsi: Coke: 9. What are the Nash equilibrium strategies of the firms? Coke: Pepsi:
5. To advertise or not to advertise Suppose that two firms, Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer, are the only sellers of espresso in some hypothetical market. The following payoff matrix gives the profit (in millions of dollars) earned by each company depending on whether or not it chooses to advertise: Hatte Latte Advertise Doesn't Advertise Advertise 10, 10 Bean Bruuer 2,18 Doesn't Advertise 18, 2 11, 11 For example, the lower left cell of the matrix shows that if Bean Bruuer advertises and Hatte Latte does not advertise, Bean Bruuer will make a profit of $18 million, and Hatte Latte will make a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Hatte Latte and Bean Bruuer are both profit-maximizing firms. If Hatte Latte chooses to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ does not advertise. If Hatte Latte chooses not to advertise, it will earn a profit of $ Bruuer does not advertise. million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a profit of $ million if Bean Bruuer advertises and a…