The market demand function is Each firm has a marginal cost of m=$0.28. Firm 1, the leader, acts before Firm 2, the follower. Solve for the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities, prices, and profits. The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities are The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium price is Profits for the firms are and Q-7,000-1,000p. 9₁ units and 92= units. (Enter your responses as whole numbers.) p=$(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) x₁ =$ ₂=$(Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places)

The market demand function is Each firm has a marginal cost of m=$0.28. Firm 1, the leader, acts before Firm 2, the follower. Solve for the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities, prices, and profits. The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium quantities are The Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium price is Profits for the firms are and Q-7,000-1,000p. 9₁ units and 92= units. (Enter your responses as whole numbers.) p=$(Enter your response rounded to two decimal places) x₁ =$ ₂=$(Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Explain the difference between a Bayesian-Nash Equilibrium and a Nash Equilibrium.
Problem 3. Consider the following game with three firms. First, firms 1 and 2 si- multancously choose quantities q1 and q2 respectively. After observing firm 1 and 2's quantities, firm 3 chooses its quantity q3. There is no production cost and the inverse demand function is p= 12 – (91 +2 + 93). (a) Compute the SPNE of this game. (b) Give an example of Nash equilibrium s* with s = 4 and s, = 6 , that is not subgame perfect. game theory question
1. Two firms (A and B) play a competition game (i.e. Cournot) in which they can choose any Qi from 0 to ¥. The firms have the same cost functions C(Qi) = 10Qi + 0.5Qi2, and thus MCi = 10 + Qi. They face a market demand curve of P = 220 – (QA + QB). a. Assume firm A chooses quantity first. Frim B observes this choice and then chooses its own quantity. What is Frim B's profit as a function of QA and QB? b. Firm B has MRB = 220 – 2QB – QA. What is firm B’s best response to an arbitrary QA selected by firm A? c. Given that firm A expects firm B’s best response, what is firm A’s profit as a function of QA? (Hint: the only unknown variable in the profit function should be QA) d. Firm A has MRA = 150 – 4QA/3. What are the equilibrium QA and QB selected in this game? e. What is the equilibrium price, and how much profit does each firm collect?
Budweiser Medium High 90, 70 60, 50 Low 120, 90 100, 70 Low 115, 100 Miller Medium 130, 60 High 90, 20 120, 40 100, 80 Numbers in each cell are profits from the size of an advertising budget- Miller first (in bold), then Budweiser. Two beer companies face the payoff table above for choosing an advertising budget. Does this decision problem have a Nash equilibrium? If so, what is it? Select one: O a. Yes. Low for Miller , Low for Budweiser. O b. No. There is no Nash equilibrium. O c. Yes. Low for Miller, Medium for Budweiser. O d. Yes. High for Miller, High for Budweiser.
Question 2 (Choices Involving Strategy): Suppose there are two competing Gyms in a local town. Each gym is individually owned and has three pricing levels to choose from: Low, Medium and High (PL,PM, and PH). Consider the table below as the outcomes for each combination of strategies (they are yearly profits in the thousands). Can you predict the outcome using ONLY iteratively dominated strategies? Why or why not? Find the Nash Equilibrium(a) using best responses. Is this the best outcome? Now, suppose that there was a sudden increase in the cost of equipment that meant the low price was no longer viable, and both choosing the medium price level meant only 50 (thousand) profit for each gym. Nothing else changes. What is the pure and mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of this new game? Gym 1 is on the left and Gym 2 is on the top. The first number inside every box is Gym 1's profit and the second (after the comma) is Gym 2's profit. (10 Marks) PL PMPH PL 125, 125 200, 75 375,50 PM 75, 250…
!
Find Nash equilibrium using cell by cell inspection
Imagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.
where is the nash equilibrium? find out the dominant strategy. it was discovered that two domestic manufacturing companies were fixing prices. if each company is silent, there is no penalty, but production and business are disrupted due to continuous investigation by the Fair Trade Commission. The penalty for revealing the estimated loss due to the investigation and collusion is as follows: Firm 2 Silence Disclosure Silence -200, -200 -590, 0 Firm 1 Disclosure 0, -590 -450, -450 fine( a hundred million won)
10
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
Please answer each part step by step and solution.