The LoJack car recovery system allows the police to track stolen cars. As a result, they not only recover 90 percent of LoJack-equipped cars that are stolen but also arrest many auto thieves and shut down many “chop shops” that take apart stolen vehicles to get at their used parts. Thus, LoJack provides both private benefits and positive externalities. Should the government consider subsidizing LoJack purchases?

The LoJack car recovery system allows the police to track stolen cars. As a result, they not only recover 90 percent of LoJack-equipped cars that are stolen but also arrest many auto thieves and shut down many “chop shops” that take apart stolen vehicles to get at their used parts. Thus, LoJack provides both private benefits and positive externalities. Should the government consider subsidizing LoJack purchases?

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that a vaccine is developed for a highly contagious strain of flu. The likelihood that anyone will get this flu decreases as more people receive the vaccine. One of the demand curves below represents the private demand for the vaccine and the other represents the social demand for the vaccine. Price (5/dose) 110T 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Quantity (doses/day) The total social benefit of 75 doses is: D1 02
Suppose that you put an invisible tracking device on your computer that will instantly lead police to it if your computer is ever stolen. Does your purchase of the tracking device provide a positive or negative externality? What kind of externality do you provide when you purchase a visible computer lock in order to prevent theft?
How would the owner respond to the negative externality caused by smokers?
Can you think of a reason why making cars safer would create negative externalities?
In which way could smoking exert a positive externality on others?
Why are taxes, one traditional remedy for negative externalities, less than ideal for smoking cessation in the United States? Nicotine is addictive/demand is inelastic, and smokers are mostly poor, so in effect cigarette taxes reduce the quality of life of people we’re trying to help without substantially reducing smoking Demand is inelastic, and smokers are mostly rich, so they don’t reduce smoking as a result of taxes Demand is elastic, and smokers are mostly old, so taxes reduce smoking but cause increased anxiety among the elderly Demand is elastic, and smokers are mostly young, so they quit smoking but are then more likely to experiment with illegal drugs
Public wifi hotspots grant many external benefits on society: more equitable access to the internet, increased educational opportunities, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of public wifi hotspots does not equal the socially optimal quantity. The following graph plots the demand for public wifi hotspots (their private value), the supply of public wifi hotspots (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of public wifi hotspots, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
Public wifi hotspots grant many external benefits on society: more equitable access to the internet, increased educational opportunities, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of public wifi hotspots does not equal the socially optimal quantity. The following graph plots the demand for public wifi hotspots (their private value), the supply of public wifi hotspots (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of public wifi hotspots, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity. PRICE OF PUBLIC WIFI HOTSPOTS Supply (Private Cost) Social Value Demand (Private Value) QUANTITY OF PUBLIC WIFI HOTSPOTS Market Equilibrium Socially Optimal Level ?
What would happen if the government subsidized consumption of this product because it has positive externalities in consumption?
The market for seasonal flu shots is depicted in the graph. As more people receive flu shots, fewer people catch the flu and potentially pass it on to others. Therefore, the chance of catching the flu decreases for everyone, even those who do not purchase a flu shot. This is an example of a positive externality. The graph contains the private demand curve (D1) and the supply curve. D1 does not take into consideration the social benefit of people getting flu shots. Graph the social demand curve by placing the end points of D2 at the correct locations. Then, indicate the dead weight loss to society by placing the DWL triangle in the correct location on the graph. The Market for Flu Vaccinations D2 (marginal soeial benefit) DWL supply D1 (marginal private benefit) Quantity of flu shots Price ($)
Identify a negative externality
With rental rates exceeding $3,000 per square foot per year, retail space in Causeway Bay, Hong Kong, is among the world's most expensive. In 2011, the Town Planning Board limited the height of future buildings in the area to between 130 and 200 meters. Real estate developer Hysan Group, which owns nine properties in the area, asked the Board to relax the limits, but the Board denied the application. What externality does the height restriction resolve? How would the Hysan Group benefit from relaxing the height restrictions? Should the restrictions on height be the same throughout Hong Kong?