The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) Th two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the accompanying table. Mini Wright Wright Subject Meter Meter 1 513 494 2 430 395 3 520 516 4 428 434 5 500 476 6 600 557 7 364 413 8 380 442 9 658 650 10 442 433 11 432 417 12 626 656 13 260 267 14 477 478 15 259 178 16 17 350 451 423 420 Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Use Hd="mini-Wright Wright Round your test statistic to two decimal places, your df down to the nearest whole number, and your P-value to three decimal places.) t = df= P-value =

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

11.2.3

State your conclusion.
We reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
We do not reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
We do not reject Ho. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
○ We reject Ho. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
Transcribed Image Text:State your conclusion. We reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. We do not reject Ho. We have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. We do not reject Ho. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. ○ We reject Ho. We not have convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments.
The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The
two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured
once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter.
The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as
long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can
assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the
accompanying table.
Mini Wright
Wright
Subject
Meter
Meter
1
513
494
23456789
430
395
520
516
428
434
500
476
600
557
364
413
380
442
658
650
10
442
433
11
432
417
12
626
656
13
260
267
14
477
478
15
259
178
16
350
17
451
423
420
Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Use
Md="mini-Wright - "Wright Round your test statistic to two decimal places, your df down to the nearest whole number, and your P-value to three decimal places.)
t =
df
=
P-value =
Transcribed Image Text:The authors of a paper compared two different instruments for measuring a person's capacity for breathing out air. (This measurement is helpful in diagnosing various lung disorders.) The two instruments considered were a Wright peak flow meter and a mini-Wright peak flow meter. Seventeen people participated in the study, and for each person air flow was measured once using the Wright meter and once using the mini-Wright meter. The Wright meter is thought to provide a better measure of air flow, but the mini-Wright meter is easier to transport and to use. Use of the mini-Wright meter could be recommended as long as there is not convincing evidence that the mean reading for the mini-Wright meter is different from the mean reading for Wright meter. For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that it is reasonable to consider the 17 people who participated in this study as representative of the population of interest. Data values from this paper are given in the accompanying table. Mini Wright Wright Subject Meter Meter 1 513 494 23456789 430 395 520 516 428 434 500 476 600 557 364 413 380 442 658 650 10 442 433 11 432 417 12 626 656 13 260 267 14 477 478 15 259 178 16 350 17 451 423 420 Use the given data to determine if there is convincing evidence that the mean reading differs for the two instruments. (Use a statistical computer package to calculate the P-value. Use Md="mini-Wright - "Wright Round your test statistic to two decimal places, your df down to the nearest whole number, and your P-value to three decimal places.) t = df = P-value =
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 6 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman