Take into consideration the following possibility: You made an effort to educate a manager on the concept of weighted evaluation models, and she responded to your explanation by asking for more information "So how exactly do you go about figuring out which factors carry more weight? Is it just a subjective estimate on my part?" In response to that question, what would you say?

Take into consideration the following possibility: You made an effort to educate a manager on the concept of weighted evaluation models, and she responded to your explanation by asking for more information "So how exactly do you go about figuring out which factors carry more weight? Is it just a subjective estimate on my part?" In response to that question, what would you say?

COMPREHENSIVE MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 EXCE

1st Edition

ISBN:9780357392676

Author:FREUND, Steven

Publisher:FREUND, Steven

Chapter5: Working With Multiple Worksheets And Workbooks

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10AYK

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following scenario: you attempted to explain the notion of weighted evaluation models to a manager, and she answered by asking "So, how do you go about determining the weight factors? Is it just a subjective estimate on my part?" What would you say in response?
Think about the following case: Weighted evaluation models: you tried to describe them to a manager, who responded with "What's that?" "So, how do you go about calculating the relative importance of the variables? Is it simply my own personal guess?" In answer, what would you say?
Think about the following case: A manager said, "Can you please clarify the concept of weighted evaluation models to me?" "So, how do you go about calculating the relative importance of the variables? Is it simply my own personal guess?" And what would you say in rebuttal?
Consider the following scenario: Manager's response when you attempted to explain weighted assessment models: "What's a weighted evaluation model?" "How do you decide which things to prioritise when weighing their relative importance? Is it simply a wild assumption on my part?" How would you respond to that?
Take into consideration the following case: A manager said, "Can you please explain the concept of weighted evaluation models to me?" "How then do you go about calculating the relative importance of the variables? Is it simply my own personal guess?" To which I ask, what would you say?
Consider 5 evaluation levels of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Bad. Jack and Jim each performed 3 tasks. Jack received evaluations of Excellent, Very Good, and Very Good for the 3 tasks, whereas Jim received Excellent, Good, and Bad. What's the Euclidean distance between Jack and Jim on their performance? Group of answer choices 0.23 0.45 0.79 1.32
When evaluating the correctness of a model, the only thing that can be considered is how well the model performs on test data. explain in detail, expand on? Explain?
A number of different assessment approaches were chosen in order to offer a more full picture of the evaluation outcomes, was this the decision?
A variety of different assessment approaches were used in order to offer a more full picture of the evaluation outcomes, was this the decision?
Use a decision table to illustrate how test cases are generated.
For the answer you provided me with was rejected and commented as follows: You still insist on this approach, basically disregarding the feedback. I could almost literally repeat my earlier comments. "The approximation ratio c+1 is based on the observation ...", right, but then this observation is not used at all. There is no real analysis, you only claim the desired ratio, but it does not follow from anything that is said.
A model can only be evaluated based on its performance on test data. explain in detail, expand on? Explain?