Table 1 shows the result of the sieve analysis for the material of asphalt concrete (AC) mixture. Analyze the result of the sieve analysis by plotting the gradation curve of the sample. Conclude either the sample that been sieve is fulfill the requirement or not? Q4. Table 1 Sieve size (mm) Mass retained (g) Gradation limit for AC 14 20.0 0.00 100 14.0 69.60 90- 100 10.0 296.10 76- 86 5.00 433.70 50 - 62 3.35 170.50 40 - 54 1.18 321.20 18 - 34 0.425 212.00 12 - 24 0.150 135.10 6-14 0.075 49.30 4-8 PAN 72.80

Table 1 shows the result of the sieve analysis for the material of asphalt concrete (AC) mixture. Analyze the result of the sieve analysis by plotting the gradation curve of the sample. Conclude either the sample that been sieve is fulfill the requirement or not? Q4. Table 1 Sieve size (mm) Mass retained (g) Gradation limit for AC 14 20.0 0.00 100 14.0 69.60 90- 100 10.0 296.10 76- 86 5.00 433.70 50 - 62 3.35 170.50 40 - 54 1.18 321.20 18 - 34 0.425 212.00 12 - 24 0.150 135.10 6-14 0.075 49.30 4-8 PAN 72.80

Traffic and Highway Engineering

5th Edition

ISBN:9781305156241

Author:Garber, Nicholas J.

Publisher:Garber, Nicholas J.

Chapter18: Bituminous Materials

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

< Two types of (60-70) asphalt cement has been tested with different temperatures to determine their penetration as shown in the table below. Which one is more susceptible to the temperature changes depending on Penetration Index (P.1) determination.? Temperature, °C 25 Penetration, 0.1 mm For asphalt cement type I For asphalt cement type II 60 70 35 80 110
Q2 (a) A specific gravity test was performed on a sample of fine aggregate and produced the following results: Mass of sand (saturated surface dry) = 520g Mass of sand (oven dry) = 510g Mass of pycnometer with full of water = 1550g Mass of pycnometer with sand and water = 1900g i. Calculate the apparent specific gravity of the fine aggregate. ii. Calculate the gross apparent specific gravity of fine aggregate.
Asphalt Technology HW Lecture 5 From the thin film oven test, it was found the following results: Container No. Original Pen No. (from penetration test) Weight before heating (gm) Weight after heating (gm) 1 131 dmm 50.3 48.8 2 49.7 48.2 Find the loss in weight due to the effect of heat and air and determine the retained penetration if the penetration value of residue after thin film oven test was 112 dmm. Then compare the results with standards (Specification limits (EN 12607-1): Change of mass, + 0.8% and retained penetration 2 43%. Solution: 1- Find the average weight before and after heating as shown in the following table: W1: Average weight before heating (gm) W2: Average weight after heating (gm) 2- Find the loss in weight of residue after thin film oven test is reported as the percentage by mass of the W1-W2 *100 = ? sample has an overall mass ? (Iloss or gain) original sample = W1 ? (> or or53 >53 50 250 >46 >43 >37 Change of mass (absolute value) hcrease in softening point -…
Three samples of aggregates were taken weighed in moist and dry condition. Moist Dry Unit Absorption Volume (m3) Unit Aggregate Wt. Wt. (%) (kN/m3) (kN/m3) Sample 1 23.425 20.018 5.14 0.366 Sample 2 22.7 18.757 3.87 0.695 Sample 3 20.292 18.387 2.62 0.237 Where; Unit weight of water = 9.81 kN/m3 %3D Determine the average free moisture content of the three samples.
Three samples of aggregates were taken weighed in moist and dry condition. Moist Dry Unit Unit Absorption Volume Aggregate Wt. Wt. (%) (m³) (kN/m) (kN/m³) Sample 1 23.425 20.018 5.14 0.366 Sample 2 22.7 18.757 3.87 0.695 Sample 3 20.292 18.387 2.62 0.237 Where; Unit weight of water = 9.81 kN/m3 Determine the average free moisture content of the three samples.
Q3) The result of sieve analysis of a sample of aggregate given in the Table below. According to ASTM C 33, the sample is acceptable or not? BS Total mass of sample 4 80 g Sieve size 10 mm 5 mm 2.36 mm 1.18 mm 600 μm 300 μm 150 μm €150μm ASTM in 4 8 16 30 50 100 <-100 Mass retained O 80 40 80 110 68 61
Example:- The design data shown in table, are used in the sample of paving mixture. Calculate asphalt mixture volumetric:- Material Asphalt cement Coarse agg. Fine agg. Mineral filler Specific gravity 1.03 (G) 2.716(Bulk G1 2.689 (Bulk G₂) On Dept. 5.3 ((P) 47.4 P 47.3 (P₂) Mix Compaction % by mass of total mix 2 Stage % by mass of total agg 5.6 (P 50.0 (P 50.0 (P
Problem #1 The following figure shows the results from the dynamic modulus test for asphalt mixtures. The specimen is 4" in diameter and 6" in height. The gauge length for the axial LVDT is 4". Time lag is 0.25s. Find |E*I, and phase angle . Axial force(lbf) 65 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -65 0 Dynamic modulus test result (gauge length = 4") 0.5 Time (second) 1 0.0010 0.0009 0.0006 0.0003 0 force (lbf) disp (in.) -0.0003 -0.0006 -0.0009 -0.0010 1.5 Axial displacement(in) 4"
Kindly give me all right answers with short explanation. Please don't miss anything. Modulus of resilience and toughness are approximately equal for linear perfectly plastic materials. True False The phase diagram of asphalt mixture consists of permeable void, impermeable void and aggregate solid. True False There are different types of Portland cement, for large, massive pours to control heat of hydration, the cement type for low heat. True False Slump test is used to measure the moist susceptibility of Portland cement concrete. True False For a given slump, increasing aggregate size can reduce water content that is needed. True False
9.37 The Marshall procedure was used to design an asphalt concrete mixture for a heavy-traffic road. Asphalt cement with a specific gravity of 1.025 is to be used. The mixture contains a 19 mm nominal maximum particle size aggre- gate, with bulk specific gravity of 2.654. The theoretical maximum specific gravity of the mix is 2.480 at 4.5% asphalt content. Trial mixes were made, with the average results shown in Table P9.37. Determine the optimum asphalt content using the Asphalt Institute design criteria (see Table 9.14). Assume a design air void content of 4% when using Table 9.15. Table P9.37 Asphalt Content, % by Weight Bulk Specific Gravity Stability, kN Flow, 0.25 mm 3.5 2.367 8.2 7.3 4.0 2.371 8.6 9.4 4.5 2.389 7.5 11.5 5.0 2.410 7.2 12.5 5.5 2.422 6.9 13.2
Sieve analysis of a sample of fine aggregate resulted in the following data No. Sieve number 4 8 16 30 50 100 Sieve opening (mm) 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.6 0.3 0.15 Weight retained (g) 13 75 120 126 105 61 A) The total weight of the sample, assuming no mass loss during the analysis, is______ (g) a) 505; b) 500; c) 550 B) The half sieve used in the experiment is________. a) No.8; b) No.50; c) none of the above C) The fineness modulus of the aggregate________. a) 6.13; b) 3.16; c) 1.36 D) The average size of the aggregate___________. a) No.30; b) No.4; c) No.16
In a Marshall test, the percentage of asphalt binder by total weight of aggregate is 5.0%. The bulk specifc gravity of aggregate (G3)=2.624, the specifc gravity of asphalt binder (G)=1.000, and the density of water (Y)=1.000 g/cm³. If the absorbed asphalt (Pa) is 2.00% by total weight of aggregate, and the voids in total mixture (VTM) is 4.0%, determine the following properties: a. The effective asphalt content (Pbe) b. The bulk specifc gravity of the compacted mixture (Gmb) c. The voids in mineral aggregate (VMA) d. The theoretical maximum specifc gravity of the loose mixture (Gmm) e. The voids flled with asphalt (VFA) f. The effective specifc gravity of aggregate solids (G)