Suppose that there is asymmetric information in the market for used cars. Sellers know the quality of the car that they are selling, but buyers do not. Buyers know that there is a 30% chance of getting a "lemon", a low quality used car. A high quality used car is worth $30,000, and a low quality used car is worth $15,000. Based on this probability the most that a buyer would be willing to pay for a used car is SO (Enter your response rounded to the nearest dollar)

Suppose that there is asymmetric information in the market for used cars. Sellers know the quality of the car that they are selling, but buyers do not. Buyers know that there is a 30% chance of getting a "lemon", a low quality used car. A high quality used car is worth $30,000, and a low quality used car is worth $15,000. Based on this probability the most that a buyer would be willing to pay for a used car is SO (Enter your response rounded to the nearest dollar)

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter20: The Problem Of Adverse Selection Moral Hazard

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 20.1IP

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Suppose that there is asymmetric information in the market for used cars. Sellers know the quality of the car that they are selling, but buyers do not. Buyers know that there is a 30% chance of getting a "lemon", a low quality used car. A high quality used car is worth $30,000, and a low quality used car is worth $15,000. Based on this probability, the most that a buyer would be willing to pay for a used car is $___
Suppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory. If the seller sells the buyer a poor quality car, what is the net-benefit to the seller? a. A net gain of $6,000. b. A net loss of $20,000. c. A net loss of $6,000. d. A net gain of $10,000.
Suppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory. What is the expected price by the buyer? a. $20,000 b. $16,000 c. $12,000 d. $4,000
A government policy aimed at protecting people against the risk of adverse events is called
Consider the following example. A risk-neutral worker can choose high or low effort. The manager cannot observe the worker's action, but the manager can observe the realized revenue for the firm (either $100 or $200). The worker has an outside option of 0. The probability of each revenue depends on the worker's effort: Low effort: cost of effort : $0 probability of low revenue ($100): 75% probability of high revenue ($200) : 25% High effort: cost of effort : $15 probability of low revenue ($100): 25% probability of high revenue ($200) : 75% The manager offers a contract which gives the worker 25% of revenue. Given this payment scheme, the worker will put in (is/is not) ✓incentive compatible. The firm's expected profit is $ The firm is considering an investment that would increase worker morale. By making work more enjoyable, the program would reduce the worker's cost of effort from $15 to $13. If it costs the firm $20 to implement this program, the firm's expected profit if they…
A risk-eutral plaintiff in a lawsuit must decide whether to settle a claim or go to trial. The defendants offer $70,000 to settle now. If the plaintiff does not settle, the plaintiff believes that the probability of winning at trial is 40%. If the plaintiff wins, the amount awarded to the plaintiff is X. Will the plaintiff settle if X is $87,500? What if X= $280,000? What is the critical value of X that would make the plaintiff indifferent between settling and going to trial? If the plaintiff were risk averse instead of risk neutral, would this critical value of X be higher or lower? If the amount to be awarded at trial with a win (X) were $87,500, then the plaintiff would settle If the amount to be awarded at trial with a win (X) were $280,000, then the plaintiff would not settle The critical value of X that would make the plaintiff indifferent between settling and going to trial is $. (Enter your response using rounded to two decimal places.)
Consider the following example. A risk-neutral worker can choose high or low effort. The worker's outside option is 0. The manager cannot observe the worker's action, but the manager can observe the realized revenue for the firm (either $100 or $200). The probability of each revenue depends on the worker's effort: Low effort: cost of effort : $0 probability of low revenue ($100): 75% probability of high revenue ($200) : 25% High effort: cost of effort : $11 probability of low revenue ($100): 25% probability of high revenue ($200) : 75% The manager offers a contract which gives the worker a flat wage of $10 and a bonus of $20 if revenue is high. Given this payment scheme, the worker will put in ✓effort. The contract (is/is not) ✓incentive compatible. The firm's expected profit is $ The firm is considering an investment that would increase worker morale. By making work more enjoyable, the program would reduce the worker's cost of effort from $11 to $9. If it costs the firm $20 to…
A principal is considering hiring a lawyer to represent him or her in a lawsuit. The principal gets $ 250 000 if the suit is won and $0 otherwise. If the agent works hard (100 hours), there is a 50% chance that the principal will win the suit. If the agent does not work hard (10 hours), there is a 15% chance that the principal will win the suit. Without a lawyer, the principal is sure to lose the suit. The principal can monitor the agent, and both parties are risk neutral. The agent's utility function is m-50e, where m is money in dollars and e is effort in hours. The agent's fee for this case is $100 per hour, and the outside opportunity is worth $500. Write down the game in extensive form and solve it.
A risk-neutral plaintiff in a lawsuit must decide whether to settle a claim or go to trial. The defendants offer $50,000 to settle now. If the plaintiff does not settle, the plaintiff believes that the probability of winning at trial is 50% if the plaintiff wins, the amount awarded to the plaintiff is X Will the plaintif settle if x is $62,500? What if X-$250,000? What is the critical value of X that would make the plaintiff indifferent between setting and going to trial? it the plaintiff were risk averse instead of risk neutral, would this critical value of X be higher or lower? If the amount to be awarded at trial with a win (X) were $62,500, then the plaintiff would settle If the amount to be awarded at trial with a win (X) were $250,000, then the plaintiff would not settle The critical value of X that would make the plaintiff indifferent between settling and going to trial is $ (Enter your response using rounded to wo decimal places)
Lucy, the manager of the medical test firm Dubrow Labs, worries about the firm being sued for botched results from blood tests. If it isn't sued, the firm expects to earn profit of $120, but if it is successfully sued, its profit will be only $20. Lucy believes that the probability of a successful suit is 20%. If fair insurance is available and Lucy is risk averse, how much insurance will she buy? Lucy will buy insurance that costs her $ when not successfully sued. (Enter your response as a whole number.)
Suppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory. How does the informational imbalance result in adverse selection? a. The expectedprice offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a poor quality car. Hence only poor quality cars are sold, which harms sellers. b. The expected price offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a good quality car. Hence only good quality cars are sold, which harms buyers. c. The expected price offered by the buyer encourages the seller to sell a good quality car. Hence only good quality cars are sold, which harms sellers. d. The…
Suppose the equilibrium price for good quality used cars is $20,000. And the equilibrium price for poor quality used cars is $10,000. Assume a potential used car buyer has imperfect information as to the condition of any given used car. Assume this potential buyer believes the probability a given used car is good quality is .60 and the probability a given used car is low quality is .40. Assume the seller has perfect information on all cars in inventory. How does the informational imbalance result in market failure? a. Only good quality cars are sold, hence the market under-provides used cars. b. Both poor and good quality cars are sold, hence the market over-provides used cars. c. Only poor quality cars are sold, hence the market under-provides used cars. d. Both poor and good quality cars are sold, hence the market efficiently provides used cars.