Suppose a firm uses the WACC as the single hurdle rate in determining the value of capital budgeting projects rather than using risk adjusted hurdle rates. Choose the statement that actually completes the sentence describing the possible outcomes for the firm: the firm will tend to Accept profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects Accept profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects Reject profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable high risk projects Become less risky overtime Reject profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects

Suppose a firm uses the WACC as the single hurdle rate in determining the value of capital budgeting projects rather than using risk adjusted hurdle rates. Choose the statement that actually completes the sentence describing the possible outcomes for the firm: the firm will tend to Accept profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects Accept profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects Reject profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable high risk projects Become less risky overtime Reject profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects

Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337395083

Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Publisher:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves

Chapter13: Capital Budgeting: Estimating Cash Flows And Analyzing Risk

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Which statements are INCORRECT? Check all that apply: when IRR is positive, the project is acceptable when profitability index is positive, the project is acceptable a decrease in a firm's WACC will increase the attractiveness of the firm's investment options when required return is less than internal rate of return, the project is acceptable
Suppose a firm uses a constant WACC in determining the value of capital budgeting projects rather than using a project beta. The firm will tend to A. accept profitable, low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects B. accept profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects C. reject profitable, low risk projects and accept unprofitable, high risk projects D. reject profitable , low risk projects and reject unprofitable, high risk projects
What is the difference between systematic and unsystematic risk?ii. What is strategic business plan and why it is important for the success of a firm? Explain inyour own words.iii. Explain for which types of projects, a detailed capital budgeting analysis is required and why?
Suppose a company uses the NPV method, alongwith risk-adjusted WACCs, to calculate projectNPVs. However, it has not been considering realoptions in its capital budgeting decisions. Nowsuppose the company changes its capital budgeting process to take account of four types of realoptions investment timing, flexibility, growth,and abandonment. Would this decision be likelyto affect some of the calculated NPVs? Explainyour answer
If a firm uses its weighted average cost of capital (WACC) as the discount rate for all of the projects it undertakes then the firm will tend to: I. reject some positive net present value projects. II. accept some negative net present value projects. III. favor low risk projects over high risk projects. IV. increase its overall level of risk over time. Group of answer choices I and III only III and IV only I, II, and III only I, II, and IV only I, II, III, and IV
(b) Kindly Provide brief answers to the following:i. What is the difference between systematic and unsystematic risk?ii. What is strategic business plan and why it is important for the success of a firm? Explain in your own words.iii. Explain for which types of projects, a detailed capital budgeting analysis is required and why?iv. What do you mean from retained earnings breakpoint? Explain in your own words with an example.
1. In the context of capital budgeting, what is an opportunity cost?2. Given the choice, would a firm prefer to use MACRS depreciation or straight-line depreciation? Why?3. In our capital budgeting examples, we assumed that a firm would recover all of the working capital it invested in a project. Is this a reasonable assumption? When might it not be valid?4. Suppose a financial manager is quoted as saying, “Our firm uses the stand-alone principle. Because we treat projects like minifirms in our evaluation process, we include financing costs because they are relevant at the firm level.” Critically evaluate this statement.
Suppose a firm calculates its external funding needs and finds that it is negative. What are the firm's options in this case?
Distinguish among beta (or market) risk, within-firm (or corporate) risk, and stand-alone risk for a project being considered for inclusion in the capital budget. In theory, market risk should be the only “relevant” risk. However, companies focus as much on stand-alone risk as on market risk. What are the reasons for the focus on stand-alone risk?
The WACC is used as the discount rate to evaluate various capital budgeting projects. However, it is important to realize that the WACC is only an appropriate discount rate for a project of average risk—in other words, a project that has the same beta as the company. If a project has less risk than the overall company risk, it should be evaluated with a lower discount rate; if a project is riskier than the overall company risk, it should be evaluated using a discount rate higher than the company WACC. Analyze the cost of capital situations of the following company cases, and answer the specific questions that finance professionals need to address. Consider the case of Turnbull Co. Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 45% debt, 4% preferred stock, and 51% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of debt of 11.1%, and its cost of preferred stock is 12.2%. If Turnbull can raise all of its equity capital from retained earnings, its cost of common equity will be 14.7%.…
If a firm has only independent projects, a constant WACC, and projects with normal cash flows, the NPV and IRR methods always lead to identical capital budgeting decisions. What does this imply about the choice between IRR and NPV? If each of the assumptions were changed (one by one), how would your answer change?
Is this statement true or false? Please explain in detail Companies should always finance projects with the highest projected ROI, to ensure that cash flows are not impacted due to a high WACC.