Powell Motors, an automobile manufacturing company, is interested in purchasing new air filters for its automobiles. The company's buying team has narrowed the alternatives to products proposed by five suppliers-supplier 1, supplier 2, and supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5. To select a supplier, the team is considering two characteristics-reliability and durability. The purchase decision lies on the performance score and the importance weight of each characteristic. The performance scores for reliability of supplier 1, supplier 2, supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5 are 10, 9, 8, 6, and 7, respectively. The performance scores for durability of supplier 1, supplier 2, supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5 are 5, 7, 8, 8, and 6, respectively. The buying team assigns reliability an importance weight of 9 against a score of 8 for durability. According to the multiattribute model of evaluation, the buying team of Powell Motors is most likely to select O supplier 2 O supplier I O supplier 4 O supplier 5 O supplier 3

Powell Motors, an automobile manufacturing company, is interested in purchasing new air filters for its automobiles. The company's buying team has narrowed the alternatives to products proposed by five suppliers-supplier 1, supplier 2, and supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5. To select a supplier, the team is considering two characteristics-reliability and durability. The purchase decision lies on the performance score and the importance weight of each characteristic. The performance scores for reliability of supplier 1, supplier 2, supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5 are 10, 9, 8, 6, and 7, respectively. The performance scores for durability of supplier 1, supplier 2, supplier 3, supplier 4, and supplier 5 are 5, 7, 8, 8, and 6, respectively. The buying team assigns reliability an importance weight of 9 against a score of 8 for durability. According to the multiattribute model of evaluation, the buying team of Powell Motors is most likely to select O supplier 2 O supplier I O supplier 4 O supplier 5 O supplier 3

Purchasing and Supply Chain Management

6th Edition

ISBN:9781285869681

Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

Publisher:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson

ChapterC: Cases

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 5.3SD: Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?
Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?
Reliability prediction is a design-assist process by which the reliability characteristics of a system are obtained, by calculating the anticipated system RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety-Integrity) from assumed component failure rates. Discuss the importance of reliability prediction and the factors that affect the reliability performance of electronics components.
When a system reliability target is not met, what must be done? Discuss reliability block diagram
An engine system consists of three main components in a series, all having the same reliability. Determine the level of reliability required for each of the components if the engine is to have a reliability of 0.998.
consider the following reliability analysis for the variable customer difference. What could you conclude from it?
Discuss the key components of a system reliability model and how they contribute to overall system reliability.
A University Web server has 5 main components, each with the same reliability. All 5 components must work for the server to function as intended. If the University wants to have a 81 percent reliability, what must be the reliability of each of the components?
Main Street Cinema invited three firms to bid on its daily janitorial services contract, and then scored those bids (also known as ´tenders’) based on quality, reliability/risk and price (using a 100 point scale in each case). The results are listed here: Tender Offer from... Quality Score Reliability/ Risk Price Score Score Dawson Commercial 70 65 85 Cleaning Services Fulton Maintenance 80 85 50 and Facilities Service 70 80 SteadyBrite Contract Cleaning 80 If Main Street Cinema were to use linear averaging to then choose a supplier for its janitorial services contract, who would it choose if it felt that quality, reliability/risk and price were all equally important aspects of the contract? O A. Dawson Commercial Cleaning Services O B. SteadyBrite Contract Cleaning O C. Dawson Commercial Cleaning Services and Fulton Maintenance and Facilities Service O D. Fulton Maintenance and Facilities Service and SteadyBrite Contract Cleaning E. Fulton Maintenance and Facilities Service
Describe the key components of a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and how it is used to improve system reliability.
For a company of your choice, describe / explain the following What supplier, customer, and operations failure risks does this firm face? What possible steps can this firm take for prevention, mitigation, and recovery for one of these risks? Supplier failure risks Customer failure risks Operations failure risks For one of the risks mentioned above (address the same risk across prevention, mitigation, and recovery): Steps for prevention Steps for mitigation Steps for recovery