OBTUSE DULL Co. is involved in a tax dispute. OBTUSE has wrongfully paid taxes and is claiming for refund of the taxes it has previously paid. As of December 31, 20x1, OBTUSE's legal counsel was very confident that OBTUSE will be able to recover the tax refund amounting to P40M in the coming year. The entry to recognize the probable receipt of the tax refund includes Select the correct response: a debit to receivable and a credit to gain a debit to receivable none of these a debit to prepaid asset a credit to gain

Hw.11.

The finance director of Hyden Ltd is unsure about the deferred tax implications for two of the items in the company’s statement of financial position.   Item 1: Hyden Ltd has a balance of $100,000 in its prepaid insurance account. The insurance is deductible when the payment to the insurance is made.     Item 2: Hyden Ltd purchased an item of property, plant and equipment (PPE) 5 years ago for $1,000,000. The depreciation expense for accounting purpose is $50,000 per annum, resulting an accumulated depreciation of $250,000 for the year. The taxation office allows this type of PPE to be depreciated at $25,000 per annum.   Required:   (a)   Calculate the deferred tax implication (deferred tax asset or deferred tax liability) for each of the above items, in accordance with IAS 12 / AASB 112 Income Taxes. Assume a tax rate of 30%. ANSWER HERE:                   Carrying Amount TaxBase Taxable Temp Diffs DeductibleTemp Diffs Prepaid insurance…

Green Corporation is required to change its method of accounting for federal income tax purposes. The change will require an adjustment to income to be made over three tax periods. Joe, the sole shareholder of Green, wants to better understand the implications of this adjustment for E&P purposes, because he anticipates a distribution from Green in the current year. Explain to Joe the impact of the adjustment on E&P.

Target Co is a large transport company. In the previous financial year, it billed one of its customers $ 1,500 for services that it had provided. Target Co has recently discovered that the client is experiencing financial distress and will not be able to pay its bill. What action should Target Co take from a tax perspective? (Maximum 250 words)

Xenon, LLC is a partnership, for tax purposes, with a C corporation member. Xenon has three year average annual gross receipts of $24 million from the retail sale of merchandise. Xenon may use the cash method for all purposes of tax reporting, without limitation. Select one: True False   Digital Video Recorders is an accrual method taxpayer that uses the calendar year as its tax year. Digital offers customers a refund if they are not satisfied with their products. During X1, 100 customers request a refund of the $500 purchase price. Digital refunds $30,000 on or before September 15, X2. It refunds the remaining $20,000 in October X2. If Digital adopts the recurring item exception with respect to the refunds, economic performance is treated as having occurred in X1 for the $50,000 refunded in X1. Select one: True False    No hand written and fast answer with explanation

Sarah Keene, CPA, is the newly hired controller for Plexicon, Inc., which is a publicly traded corporation. Ms. Keene's first job with Plexicon was the review of the company's accounting practices on deferred income taxes. In doing her review, she noted differences between tax and book depreciation methods that permitted Plexicon to realize a sizable deferred tax liability on its balance sheet. As a result, Plexicon paid very little in income taxes at that time.\\n\\n Keene also discovered that Plexicon has an explicit policy of selling off plant assets before they reversed in the deferred tax liability account. This policy, coupled with the rapid expansion of its plant asset base, allowed Plexicon to "defer" all income taxes payable for several years, even though it always has reported positive earnings and an increasing EPS. Keene checked with the legal department and found the policy to be legal, but she's uncomfortable with the ethics of it.\\n\\nRequired:\\n\\nWhy would Plexicon…

Mr. Stanhope has an MBA degree from Stanford University and has successfully operated a business for 18 years. The revenue agent who audited Mr. Stanhope's Form 1040 discovered a glaring error resulting in a $17,500 underpayment of tax. When questioned by the revenue agent about the error, Mr. Stanhope just shrugged and offered no logical explanation. Required: a. If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. b. Is Mr. Stanhope's level of education and business experience likely to be a factor considered by the revenue agent in determining negligence? Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B If the error resulted from Mr. Stanhope's blatant disregard of a tax rule, compute the penalty for negligence. Accuracy-related penalty

The revenue agent who audited Ms. Hsui's Form 1040 discovered a $15,500 deduction that wasn't allowed by the tax law. The improper deduction reduced Ms. Hsui's tax by $5,053. The total tax deficiency for the year under audit was $6,510. Required: a. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. b. Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction represented Ms. Hsui's deliberate attempt to cheat the government by underpaying tax. Complete this question by entering your answers in the tabs below. Required A Required B Compute the maximum penalty if the agent concludes that the improper deduction was due to Ms. Hsui's negligence in preparing the tax return. Note: Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount. Negligence penalty s 291 Ⓡ Required A Required B >

Please answer the questions fully and leave the correct answer, do not copy the answer from online because those are incorrect!!! please show all the calculations and journal entries in the same format bellow.Thank you   Taxable income and applicable tax rates for C.J. Company’s first four years are shown below. For each year, taxable income and pretax financial income are identical. In the table below, taxable income is before any consideration of NOL carryback and carryforward. The enacted tax rates were known at 1/1/2018.                                                             Taxable               Income         Enacted tax rate 2018       $200                     20% 2019       ($300)                    15% 2020       $340                     25% 2021       $210                     25% 1- Now assume that C.J. opted to carryback its 2019 NOL and carryforward any unused NOL to future years. Complete the table below for 2018 through 2021 to show the amount of income tax payable…