Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. Table below represents the choices available to Mary and Raj and the payoffs associated with each outcome. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? (A = Work independently; B = Cooperate and Raise prices. Each results entry lists Raj earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.) Mary A B Raj A ($100, $100) ($200, $0) B ($0, $200) ($150, $150)

Mary and Raj are the only two growers who provide organically grown corn to a local grocery store. Table below represents the choices available to Mary and Raj and the payoffs associated with each outcome. What is the best choice for Raj if he is sure that Mary will cooperate? If Mary thinks Raj will cheat, what should Mary do and why? What is the prisoner’s dilemma result? (A = Work independently; B = Cooperate and Raise prices. Each results entry lists Raj earnings first, and Mary's earnings second.) Mary A B Raj A ($100, $100) ($200, $0) B ($0, $200) ($150, $150)

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

5th Edition

ISBN:9781337106665

Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Chapter15: Strategic Games

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $10,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance enhancing drug. If one athlete takes the drug, and the other does not, the one who takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neither take the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking the drug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a loss of X dollars. a) Draw a 2×2 payoff matrix describing the decisions the athletes face. b) For what X is taking the drug the Nash equilibrium? c) Does making the drug safer (that is, lowering X) make the athletes better or worse off? Explain.
A "Prisoner's Dilemma" is a situation in which both parties: a) have an incentive to cooperate(meaning working with the other criminal by keeping one's mouth shut) even without communication b) have an incentive to not cooperate(meaning working with other criminal by keeping one's mouth shut) even through cooperation would be mutually benefical. c)have no incentives to cooperate or not cooperate because either way they lose.
Two athletes of equal ability are competing for a prize of $12,000. Each is deciding whether to take a dangerous performance-enhancing drug. If one athlete takes the drug and the other does not, the one who takes the drug wins the prize. If both or neither take the drug, they tie and split the prize. Taking the drug imposes health risks that are equivalent to a loss of XX dollars. Complete the following payoff matrix describing the decisions the athletes face. Enter Player One's payoff on the left in each situation, Player Two's on the right. Player Two's Decision Take Drug Don't Take Drug Player One's Decision Take Drug , , Don't Take Drug , , True or False: The Nash equilibrium is taking the drug if X is greater than $6,000. True False Suppose there was a way to make the drug safer (that is, have lower XX). Which of the following statements are true about the effects of making the drug safer? Check all that…
Consider a game between 2 payers (Ann and Bill) where each chooses between 3 actions (Up, Middle and Down). 1) Create a payoff matrix that reflects this. 2) Fill in payoff numbers that makes this game a Prisoner's Dilemma. 3) Explain why your game is a Prisoner's Dilemma.
The US and Canada have overfished North Atlantic cod stocks nearly to the point of extinction. Both countries wish to preserve the cod industry (and hence the cod stocks), so the two countries sign an agreement to limit fish hauls. Each country has two possible strategies: comply with the agreement (limit fishing) or renege on the agreement (overfish). Each country’s payoffs for different strategy combinations are given in the matrix below. The numbers in the cells represent utilities, and the payoff ordering is (US, Canada). QUESTIONS: 1.If this is a one-shot game (i.e., it is played once), do the players have a dominant strategy? If so, what is it? Briefly explain your answer. 2.What is the equilibrium of this game? Is it Pareto-optimal? How do you know?
Which of the following is true of a prisoner's dilemma? Players will be best off if they cooperate, but they have an incentive to follow their individual self-interest. Players will be best off if they cooperate, and they will have enough incentive to do so. Players will be best off if they follow their individual self-interest, but they have an incentive to cooperate. Players will have no incentive to take any particular action.
In the sequential production game shown below, the actions of four players are required in order for a company's project to be successful (for example, each player could be a different division or department with the company). Player 1 Player 2 Player 3 Player 4 Act Act Act Act 10 10 10 Quit Quit Quit Quit 10 -X -X -X -X -X -X Suppose x = 5,000 (payoffs are -5,000). Suppose player 1 believes that Player 4 will quit with probability p. How does this change the game? %3D O a) If 0 0.002, Player 1 will quit. O c) If p > 0, Player 1 will quit d) The value of p is irrelevant to Player 1 O o o o
Complete the payoff matrix to show how this scenario would end up as a prisoner's dilemma for Horizon and AT-Phone. Low production: 300 customers Horizon $27,000 Low production: 300 customers AT-Phone High prodiction: 400 customers $27,000 revenue $24,000 High production: 400 customers $30,000 revenue $22,500 revenue $24,000 revenue C $22,500 D $30,000
A) What is the suitable strategy that best describe "prisoner dilemma" above? B) What is the most likelihood of decisions will be made by Ronaldo and Gonzalo?In which quadrant? Why they think that the decision is the best option for them?
THE PRISONERS' DILEMMA: ESSENTIAL FEATURES Consider the following simple model of the Mile End Park Beautification Initiative (from the lectures). There are two students, each of whom can choose to plant flowers (F) or not to plant flowers (N). If both students plant flowers, then the (flower appreciation) benefit is 130 to each player. If exactly one student plants flowers, then the benefit is 60 to each player. The cost to either player of planting flowers is c> 0, regardless of the other player's choice. Each student starts (before any costs or benefits) with a payoff of zero. The above assumptions lead to the following game in strategic form. 130- с, 130с 60 - с, 60 60, 60 c 0,0 Suppose that e< 130. This game is a prisoners' dilemma if and only if the parameter c is strictly greater than which value? Answer:
Problem 3. Consider the following two-player game. Player 1 (the row player) has three strategies {U, F, D}, and Player 2 (the column player) has four strategies {L, M, N, R}. In each cell, the first number is the pay-off of Player 1, and the second is that of Player 2. There is an unknown x in the table. Consider pure strategies only. U F D L (0, 3) (6,0) (3, 1) M (1,0) (5, 1) (4,2) N (2,5) (x, 2) (1, 1) R (4,2) (5, 1) (1, 3) (1) Find a number x such that {F, N} is the unique Nash equilibrium. (2) Find a number x such that the game has more than one Nash equilibria. What are these Nash equilibria in this case? (3) Is it possible to find a number x such that the game has no Nash equilibrium? For each of your answers above, an explanation needs to be provided.
Game theory: Consider a collective action game with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number of participants in the joint project is n, each individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of C(n) = 32 − 2n. 1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and unstable ones. 2. Find the socially optimal outcome. 3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially optimal. Explain your answer.