Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Is all published research statistically correct? Stoehr and Wenk (1995) published an article in which they were examining the effects of a brain lesion on learning in rats. They were also interested in whether the lesion would produce different effects in young, adult, or old rats. This experiment was conducted as an independent-measures factorial design in which one factor was Lesion (lesion or control surgery) and the other factor was Age (young, adult or old). For the rats in the lesion groups (young, adult or old), an area of the brain knows as the nucleus basalis (NB) was damaged, and for the rats in the control groups (young, adult or old), no damage was produced. After recovery from surgery, animals were trained and tested. For training, animals from all 6 groups were placed into a chamber and were given a brief shock. Testing occurred the next day, and the animals were returned to the chamber and behavior was measured. The researchers measured immobility. If the animals learned that the chamber was associated with shock, then the next time they are put into the chamber they will show immobility, which is a measure of fear in these animals. Below is a graph of their data, taken from the published journal article, followed by part of their results section. The description of the results provided below is a direct quote. % Immobility 100 75 50 25 0 Young Adult Age Control ■Lesion Old

Is all published research statistically correct? Stoehr and Wenk (1995) published an article in which they were examining the effects of a brain lesion on learning in rats. They were also interested in whether the lesion would produce different effects in young, adult, or old rats. This experiment was conducted as an independent-measures factorial design in which one factor was Lesion (lesion or control surgery) and the other factor was Age (young, adult or old). For the rats in the lesion groups (young, adult or old), an area of the brain knows as the nucleus basalis (NB) was damaged, and for the rats in the control groups (young, adult or old), no damage was produced. After recovery from surgery, animals were trained and tested. For training, animals from all 6 groups were placed into a chamber and were given a brief shock. Testing occurred the next day, and the animals were returned to the chamber and behavior was measured. The researchers measured immobility. If the animals learned that the chamber was associated with shock, then the next time they are put into the chamber they will show immobility, which is a measure of fear in these animals. Below is a graph of their data, taken from the published journal article, followed by part of their results section. The description of the results provided below is a direct quote. % Immobility 100 75 50 25 0 Young Adult Age Control ■Lesion Old

Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition 2012
1st Edition
ISBN:9780547587776
Author:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
Chapter11: Data Analysis And Probability
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8CR
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Is all published research statistically correct? Stoehr and Wenk (1995) published an article in which they were examining the effects of a brain lesion on learning in rats. They were also interested in whether the lesion would produce different effects in young, adult, or old rats. This experiment was conducted as an independent-measures factorial design in which one factor was Lesion (lesion or control surgery) and the other factor was Age (young, adult or old). For the rats in the lesion groups (young, adult or old), an area of the brain knows as the nucleus basalis (NB) was damaged, and for the rats in the control groups (young, adult or old), no damage was produced. After recovery from surgery, animals were trained and tested. For training, animals from all 6 groups were placed into a chamber and were given a brief shock. Testing occurred the next day, and the animals were returned to the chamber and behavior was measured. The researchers measured immobility. If the animals learned that the chamber was associated with shock, then the next time they are put into the chamber they will show immobility, which is a measure of fear in these animals. Below is a graph of their data, taken from the published journal article, followed by part of their results section. The description of the results provided below is a direct quote. % Immobility 100 75 50 25 0 Young Adult Age Control ■Lesion Old
Transcribed Image Text:Is all published research statistically correct? Stoehr and Wenk (1995) published an article in which they were examining the effects of a brain lesion on learning in rats. They were also interested in whether the lesion would produce different effects in young, adult, or old rats. This experiment was conducted as an independent-measures factorial design in which one factor was Lesion (lesion or control surgery) and the other factor was Age (young, adult or old). For the rats in the lesion groups (young, adult or old), an area of the brain knows as the nucleus basalis (NB) was damaged, and for the rats in the control groups (young, adult or old), no damage was produced. After recovery from surgery, animals were trained and tested. For training, animals from all 6 groups were placed into a chamber and were given a brief shock. Testing occurred the next day, and the animals were returned to the chamber and behavior was measured. The researchers measured immobility. If the animals learned that the chamber was associated with shock, then the next time they are put into the chamber they will show immobility, which is a measure of fear in these animals. Below is a graph of their data, taken from the published journal article, followed by part of their results section. The description of the results provided below is a direct quote. % Immobility 100 75 50 25 0 Young Adult Age Control ■Lesion Old
"Results. A two-way Analysis of Variance (lesion x age) of immobility behavior showed main effects of lesion [F (1, 30) = 4.79, p < .05] and age [F (2, 30) = 3.77, p < .05], but no significant interaction [F (2, 30) = .05, p = 0.95]. Post hoc Tukey tests (HSD = 13.5) revealed that old control rats showed significantly less immobility than young control rats and that young lesion rats showed significantly less immobility than young control rats." The group means that are plotted in the graph are also presented in the matrix below: Lesion Control Lesion + Conclusion: Young 85 54 Age Adult 84 70 Old 65 51 0 If we assume that the statistics (F values and Tukey HSD value) presented in the results sections are correct, are the conclusions that Stoehr and Wenk made about the effects of lesion and age on learning correct? If not, what should they have been?
Transcribed Image Text:"Results. A two-way Analysis of Variance (lesion x age) of immobility behavior showed main effects of lesion [F (1, 30) = 4.79, p < .05] and age [F (2, 30) = 3.77, p < .05], but no significant interaction [F (2, 30) = .05, p = 0.95]. Post hoc Tukey tests (HSD = 13.5) revealed that old control rats showed significantly less immobility than young control rats and that young lesion rats showed significantly less immobility than young control rats." The group means that are plotted in the graph are also presented in the matrix below: Lesion Control Lesion + Conclusion: Young 85 54 Age Adult 84 70 Old 65 51 0 If we assume that the statistics (F values and Tukey HSD value) presented in the results sections are correct, are the conclusions that Stoehr and Wenk made about the effects of lesion and age on learning correct? If not, what should they have been?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS