irms A and B under duopoly (oligopoly) are competing in an engine production market. Firm A’s marginal cost is $14 while firm B’s is $15. They play a sequential quantity setting- game and firm B is a first mover. Who has an advantage in this game? Now suppose they play a sequential price setting-game and firm B is a first mover. Who has an advantage in this game

irms A and B under duopoly (oligopoly) are competing in an engine production market. Firm A’s marginal cost is $14 while firm B’s is $15. They play a sequential quantity setting- game and firm B is a first mover. Who has an advantage in this game? Now suppose they play a sequential price setting-game and firm B is a first mover. Who has an advantage in this game

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider two firms who compete with each other in terms of quantity. If the inverse market demand and total costs of the firms are given by P = 140 – Q TC, = 20q, + 10 TC2 = 20q1 + 10 a. Find the Response (Reaction) functions of each curve b. Find the Nash Equilibrium of this Cournot duopoly game c. Graphically represent this equilibrium using their Response (Reaction) curves d. Suppose these two firms collude and form a cartel, what will the equilibrium be under this situation e. Is the equilibrium under (d) sustainable or not and why? f. Suppose that both firms have agreed that firm 1 is a leader and firm 2 is a follower, find the Nash equilibrium of this sequential game
Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table shows Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Two firms compete by advertising. Given the payoff matrix to this advertising game, identify each firm's best response to its rival's possible actions. If Firm 2 does not advertise, then Firm 1 should should If Firm 1 does not advertise, then Firm 2 should should Does either firm have a dominant strategy? Firm 1's dominant strategy is to What is the Nash equilibrium? and if Firm 2 advertises, then Firm 1 and if Firm 1 advertises, then Firm 2 and Firm 2's dominant strategy is to No Ads Firm 2 Advertise No Ads 4 6 0 Advertise 0 6 6
Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 10.4 shows. Firm B colludes with Firm A Firm B cheats by selling more output Firm A colludes with Firm B A gets $1,000, B gets $100 A gets $800, B gets $200 Firm A cheats by selling more output A gets $1,050, B gets $50 A gets $500, B gets $20 Table10.4 Assuming that both firms know the payoffs, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Firm B Low Price High Price Firm A Firm B receives $ Low Price A: $14 million B: $14 million High Price A: $13 million B: $16 million A: $16 million A: $18 million B: $13 million B: $17 million The table above shows the payoff matrix for two oligopoly firms deciding the price to charge to maximize profit. The Pareto outcome occurs when Firm A receives $ million. million and
Suppose two firms (A and B) are competing in price. Each firm can charge either High or Low price and the payoffs (profit or loss) from these strategies are presented below: Firm B High 50, -40 10, 10 Low Firm A Low 0,0 High -40, 50 a. Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria b. If this game is played ten times by these two firms, find all pure strategy Nash equilibria c. Suppose this game is played infinitely and these firms agreed to charge high price in order to earn profits of Gh10 each but a firm will charge low price if its rival cheats. Find the a discount rate that will cause a firm to cheat d. Suppose the discount rate is 40% will the collusion strategies constitute a Nash Equilibrium
Sometimes oligopolies in the same industry are very different in size. Suppose we have a duopoly where one firm (Firm A) is large and the other firm (Firm B) is small, as shown in the prisoner’s dilemma box in Table 5. Firm B colludes with Firm A Firm B cheats by selling more output Firm A colludes with Firm B A gets $1,000, B gets $100 A gets $800, B gets $200 Firm A cheats by selling more output A gets $1,050, B gets $50 A gets $500, B gets $20 Assuming that the payoffs are known to both firms, what is the likely outcome in this case?
Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereais. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($5.00) or a low price ($3.00) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? Kelogg Price- $5.00 Price $3.00 OA The cooperative equilibrium is for Kelogg to choose a price of $3.00 and Post to choose a price of $5.00. OB. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $3.00. OC. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $5.00. OD. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $5.00 and Post to choose a price dk $3.00. OF Acooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game 00 Price= $5.00 1200 S000 $1.000 Post Is the cooperative equilibrium ikely to occur? $1.000 Price $3.00 450 The…
Consider two firms choosing quantities sequentially in a duopoly setting (i.e. the Stackelberg game). The two firms have identical products. Each firm has no fixed costs, and faces marginal costs equal to 5 plus the quantity it produces (i.e. MC = 5 + q). Market demand is given by Q = 46 - P, where Q is market quantity and P is market price. In equilibrium, how much will the firm that moves first produce?
Economics Consider two firms that are choosing the price of competing products. The choices are contained in the payoff table. Each firm can raise price, lower price, or maintain their price. Suppose the game is played once each period forever. If both players play the strategy "always lower price" is this a Nash equilibrium? Let b = discount rate, 0 < b <1. Raise price Maintain price Lower price Firm B Raise price Maintain price Lower price 6. 4 8. 8 1.1 5, 5 4, 6 7.2 1.1 3.3 Firm A 2.7 No. because it is dominated by raising the price. No, because it is dominated by both firms raising the price. No, because it is dominated by maintaining the price. Yes.
The only two firms in a market are trying to decide what price to charge. The payoff matrix for this duopoly game is shown below. The payoffs are thousands of dollars of economic profit. In the Nash equilibrium, A). Firm A and Firm B are both making $80,000 in economic profit. B). Firm A and Firm B are both making $75,000 in economic profit. C). Firm A is making $80,000 and Firm B is making $75,000 in economic profit. D). Firm A and Firm B are both making $60,000 in economic profit.
QUESTION 14 Consider a oligopoly with two firms. Each firm has constant marginal cost of 3 dollar per unit and zero fixed costs. Suppose the market demand curve is P = 15 - Q, where Q = Q₁ + Q₂ is the sum of the quantities produced by both firms. Suppose each firm can produce either 1, 2, 3, or 4 units. Which of the following is a Nash equilibrium outcome? Each firm produces 4 units. Each firm produces 3 units. Each firm produces 1 unit. Each firm produces 2 units.