In 1776, Adam Smith ([1776] 1936) published his treatise, An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , which was taken by many to be a theory of economic growth. Smith, however, was clearly concerned with economic development. The classical school of economic thought, predominantly modeled after Smith, is largely geared toward understanding and explaining economic development. Smith presented a supply driven model of growth, where output was related to labor, land, and capital. Thus, economic growth, which is the increase in output, was related to population growth, investment, land growth, and increases in productivity. According to Smith, society was dependent on the economy’s ability to sustain its increasing workforce. Investment was dependent on the rate of savings. Land growth was dependent on the ability to acquire more land (through conquest) or on the increase in the productivity of existing land. He also believed in the division or specialization of labor as a key factor in economic growth, enhanced by improved machinery and international trade. Smith argued that increased specialization would increase productivity and reduce per-unit costs, leading to increasing returns. However, he also thought that, in spite of increasing returns, such an economy would ultimately stagnate, wherein capital accumulation and population growth will approach zero. Smith believed that the extension of markets was the key to economic growth largely through the role that market extension played in creating greater specialization. Smith emphasized specialization as leading to greater productivity. He also argued that the mercantilist system was holding back England by limiting its market and, hence, limiting the division of labor. The mercantilist system, while it promoted the expansion of markets beyond the more limited markets of feudalism, restricted and regulated markets in many ways that Smith found objectionable. give the point of view of the following classical economists on economic development and explain the pros and cons.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

In 1776, Adam Smith ([1776] 1936) published his treatise, An Inquiry into Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations , which was taken by many to be a theory of economic growth. Smith, however, was clearly concerned with economic development. The classical school of economic thought, predominantly modeled after Smith, is largely geared toward understanding and explaining economic development. Smith presented a supply driven model of growth, where output was related to labor, land, and capital. Thus, economic growth, which is the increase in output, was related to population growth, investment, land growth, and increases in productivity. According to Smith, society was dependent on the economy’s ability to sustain its increasing workforce. Investment was dependent on the rate of savings. Land growth was dependent on the ability to acquire more land (through conquest) or on the increase in the productivity of existing land. He also believed in the division or specialization of labor as a key factor in economic growth, enhanced by improved machinery and international trade. Smith argued that increased specialization would increase productivity and reduce per-unit costs, leading to increasing returns. However, he also thought that, in spite of increasing returns, such an economy would ultimately stagnate, wherein capital accumulation and population growth will approach zero. Smith believed that the extension of markets was the key to economic growth largely through the role that market extension played in creating greater specialization. Smith emphasized specialization as leading to greater productivity. He also argued that the mercantilist system was holding back England by limiting its market and, hence, limiting the division of labor. The mercantilist system, while it promoted the expansion of markets beyond the more limited markets of feudalism, restricted and regulated markets in many ways that Smith found objectionable.

  • give the point of view of the following classical economists on economic development and explain the pros and cons.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Specialization
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education