Hi I'm studying pharmacokinetics and i was reading a study on how food can increase the F while fasted does not on ivermectin. The study was using VPc and bootstrap analysis and i could not understand either. The graph on vpc was odd looking with tre lines and i could not differentiate which was observant and simulation. Please explain? also why are there so many black dots around the second line in the middle and what does it mean?

icon
Related questions
Question
100%

Hi I'm studying pharmacokinetics and i was reading a study on how food can increase the F while fasted does not on ivermectin. The study was using VPc and bootstrap analysis and i could not understand either. The graph on vpc was odd looking with tre lines and i could not differentiate which was observant and simulation. Please explain? also why are there so many black dots around the second line in the middle and what does it mean?

Concentration (ng/mL)
90
60
30
0.
0
Fed
20
0
Time (h)
Figure 1. VPC (n=500 simulations) with 80% CI bands (10th and 90th percentiles shaded light grey, median shaded dark grey) and observed
(dashed lines, 10th and 90th percentiles; solid line, median).
40
60
Fasted
20
40
60
Transcribed Image Text:Concentration (ng/mL) 90 60 30 0. 0 Fed 20 0 Time (h) Figure 1. VPC (n=500 simulations) with 80% CI bands (10th and 90th percentiles shaded light grey, median shaded dark grey) and observed (dashed lines, 10th and 90th percentiles; solid line, median). 40 60 Fasted 20 40 60
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question

I think am starting to understand, thank you! From this graph how the first and second line be coming down and the third up? shouldn't it be the other way around since it a oral dos a not a IV. The plasma concentration should be going up not down since its a oral intake?

Solution
Bartleby Expert
SEE SOLUTION